Category: Second Amendment

No Incentive to Stop

“It’s obvious the court is not on our side on a whole host of issues,” said Democratic Rep. Meg Froelich of Denver, co-chair of the legislature’s Gun Violence Prevention Caucus. But she said advocates for stricter gun laws at the statehouse aren’t going to slow down, in spite of legal challenges from Second Amendment advocates. [More]

Text, history, and tradition are not on your side. But you have unlimited tax plunder resources, and the only ones it costs are double-taxed gun owners…

[Via Jess]

Paved with Good Intentions

An Armed New York: the New York Young Republican Club Stands for the 2nd Amendment [More]

You guys are going to have to do more than “wishing” and teaching your members how to comply with infringements.

And before virtue signaling “Legal immigration is beneficial to America,” you might want to check the numbers on how they vote, because 60% Democrat to 15% Republican sure doesn’t sound that way.

[Via Andy M]

Calling All Comment Posters

Brady’s Astroturf Campaign To Skew The Comments [Watch]

Skew back.

Here’s my comment:

This proposed rule infrin ges on the Second Amendment.

As Edwin Vieira Jr. noted in Kolbe v. Hogan:

“This reliance on a permanent private market for firearms guaranteed that most militiamen, through their own efforts, could always obtain firearms suitable for both collective and individual self-defense, and forestalled tyranny by precluding rogue public officials from monopolizing the production, distribution, and possession of firearms.”

They gave me a tracking number to check back when it’s posted.

Have you made your views known yet?

UPDATE

John Lott explains how this will create a backdoor gun registry.

[Via Jess]

It Takes a Villa… Division

It takes armies of homegrown peacemakers at the community level to steer people away from social networks in which gun violence is embedded and break this horrific cycle. [More]

That’s funny. All it took for me and everyone I value was responsible parents who set moral examples.

I guess throwing more money at a cultural outcome of their creation is what the power-hungry and their useful idiots would demand.

But as long as we’re going with military metaphors, I don’t suppose any of these wealth redistribution grabtards would be interested in talking “militia”…?

Undoing All the Good and Then Some

NRA Endorses Attorney General Jeff Landry for Louisiana’s Gubernatorial Race [More]

And:

Jeff Landry-owned firm imported workers with the help of felon who broke immigration laws [More]

Yeah, well, what does one have to do with the other?

It doesn’t matter what you vote on today with the right hand if the left hand is making voting useless tomorrow.

What’s in YOUR Magazine?

Ammunition Manufacturer Fires Back at Gov. Grisham: Offers Free Deliveries to all New Mexico Customers with Special Promo Code, “F*ck Off, Gov. Grisham” [More]

What would you pick, given the choice between giving your business to Fenix or giving it to companies that arm the disarmers…

[Via bondmen]

Gun Kapo Rich

Gun owners: It’s time for us to stand up against the Second Amendment death culture [More]

If I were an FFL and this pin-headed Fudd traitor walked into my store I’d tell him to get the hell out. Assuming he really is a gun owner…

This, apparently is what he once believed, and has now done a 180 to embrace being a tool. Now he showcases all the leftist DSM outlets that have exploited his new-found useful idiocy at the bottom of his website.

You’d think with all that national exposure he’d have more than 105 Facebook followers. In other words, his “influence” is all Astroturf.

They’re not much buying his $h!+ over at TwittX, either…

His “team” notwithstanding…

[Via Andy M]

Naked, Undisguised Tyranny

They don’t even try to hide their appetites for our freedom anymore.

Any LEO who enforces this will have chosen his side.

I expect an injunction will stop this in no time, but it’s a useful illustration to show what these totalitarian wannabes are about.

Posers

The Los Angeles City Council on Tuesday, Sept. 5, approved recommendations intended to promote and track the filing of gun violence restraining orders against people who pose a danger to themselves or others. [More]

If they’re proven dangers, why aren’t they in custody until they no longer are?

If it hasn’t been proven, how is saying they pose a danger not libelous?

[Via Jess]

Just Here for the Attention

We have a ton of handcuffs ready for those who refuse to give their guns up so if you refuse just be ready to get arrested, you are part of the problem. Just give it up and we won’t have a problem, we will go door to door. [More]

Also from “Jay”:

Farming for interactions is the lowest of lows and ruins the Twitter experience.

Case closed.

[Via WiscoDave]

Ulterior Motives

FIREARM MARKETING BANS REALLY ABOUT ERASING NEXT GENERATION’S GUN RIGHTS [More]

Yeah, that’s a goal, but I’d say it’s really about banning speech to facilitate thought control.

It’s about tyranny.

That’s what NSSF doesn’t get when it thinks it can partner with monsters that won’t ultimately turn on them.

[Via JR]

Verified by MonsterInsights