Category: Tyranny

Wrong Thinking is Punishable

Gamers who carry out virtual rapes in the ‘metaverse’ should be charged as real-life sex attackers, a legal expert insists…Professor Clare McGlynn, a law expert at Durham University, branded the metaverse a ‘ticking time bomb’ and warned that the number of sex attacks is set to ‘explode’ in the next few years. [More]

Then why not virtual assault, virtual first-person shooting, and Grand Theft Auto…?

I’ll bet “science” could come up with skull implants that could detect when the violence excitement segment of the brain gets stimulated, that could be fitted on everybody, and we could really get serious about punishing thought crimes!

Life imitates art.

Alternatively, we could just lock up McGlynn, humanely, in a nice padded cell where she belongs.

[Via Michael G]

The War on Food

The Self-Serving, Tyrannical War on Food – ‘Climate Change’: Grift of the Century, Part II [More]

On this I’d say their reach exceeds their grasp because supermarkets have become such an expectation as an entitlement that doing this starting with blue state legislation will generate pushback from people having something taken away from them.

So, what catastrophe turning today’s normal into yesterday’s diminishing memory do they have planned?

[Via Michael G]

Meanwhile, Across the Pond…

Speech and self-defense are dead letters in England [More]

We know that, of course, but it never hurts to read new outrages, both to see what we can expect here and to be able to make informed decisions on expending blood and treasure to once more pull this cursed plot’s bum out of a fire they bring upon themselves.

[Via bondmen]

May Be Just the Push We Need

WAYNE ROOT: Here is the Final Proof Democrats are Deranged, Insane, Brainwashed, Radical Communist Zealots, and Can Never, Never, Never, EVER Be Allowed to Regain Power, or America is DOA. [More]

I think he’s forgetting something.

There’s a reason the evil but cowardly bastards won’t try mass gun confiscation — becauase they know they can’t and if they make it up close and personal for enough of us, some of us are going to0 start making it up close and personal for them. And that means the Second Amendment is still working.

[Via bondmen]

When Democrats Ruled the Earth

The fight against California’s 11% firearm tax (AB 28) is facing roadblocks in the James v. Mederos lawsuit. The state is delaying the case with legal technicalities, forcing gun dealers to continue paying this unconstitutional tax. [Watch]

Well, yeah. They’re Democrats.

Question: Why is no one bellyaching about Pittman-Robertson, especially with all those anti-freedom Fudds throwing the rest of us under the bus?

[Via Jess]

Speaking of Seditious Conspiracy…

Illinois gov calls for mass protests against Trump admin: GOP ‘cannot know a moment of peace’… JB Pritzker described Trump and those he has tapped as ‘an affront to every value this country was founded upon’ [More]

Right. They’d have been fine with criminalizing armed citizens and cutting the d!cks off posterity. And by “those he has tapped,” don’t forget yourself if you voted for Trump over Kamala.

Imagine if Trump had said that on J6– it would have been a slam dunk conviction. So, will how much responsibility will this tub of goo bear should predictable Democrat passions prevail on a national scale?

Now imagine his presidential aspirations materializing. I guess at least we’d figure out how serious most gun owners are.

Sounds Like Europe Could Use Some Pre-Rebellion…

Not wearing a black hooded cloak for this, I see…

The same globalists who forced “vaccines” on bodies now demand to do it to minds.

[Via WiscoDave]

Michigan Says ‘Hold Our Beer’ on Red Flag Due Process Concerns

But it’s also that part of the law that worries Second Amendment advocates who have long voiced opposition to the law on several fronts, including the statute’s effect on gun owners who are not the subject of the actual order — such as the parents of a 6-year-old named in an extreme risk protection order. [More]

By hook or by crook…

[Via Jess]

What’s To Decide?

The matter began when Philpotts, while facing rape charges, was convicted of a weapons charge in 2018. The charge, possessing weapons under disability, often means a person convicted of a violent crime cannot have a firearm. In Philpotts’ case, he was merely accused of a violent crime. The rape charges against him were later dropped, but his firearm conviction remained. [More]

That would appear to be a no-brainer. Unfortunately, we’re dealing with no gunsers.

[Via JG]

Verified by MonsterInsights