Federal judge rules Trump violated military law by activating National Guard in California – Judge Charles Breyer’s opinion echoed remarks he made during a three-day trial in which he questioned if presidents have any limits on when they can use the military [More]
I have Constitutional concerns about overreach, too, but this is different.
If a judge has personal skin in the game that makes impartiality impossible, isn’t he supposed to recuse himself?
Senior District Judge Charles R. Breyer, in violation of his oath of office, did knowingly and willfully use his judicial position to advance political gain while interfering with the President’s constitutional prerogatives and enforcement of the rule of law.
Why doesn’t this “news” story, affecting voter perception, mention that?
Do any?
And what’s in it for Democrats to let violence and chaos reign?