It Depends Upon What the Meaning of the Word ‘Permanent’ Is

Today, Gun Owners of America, Gun Owners Foundation and the Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL) secured a permanent injunction against the State of Virginia’s universal background check law (Virginia Code Section 18.2-308.2:5) in the case of Wilson v. Hanley. [More]

So it won’t be appealed to the State Supreme Court, and no petition to SCOTUS if they lose there?

On a Sauer Note

New Jersey Attorney General Platkin (D) filed a complaint against SIG SAUER, making numerous false and unsubstantiated claims about the P320. This false information requires immediate clarification and remedy. [More]

New Jersey Democrats don’t care about safe guns– they just want to destroy the company.

Sig is riding the tiger, holding on for dear life, knowing what will happen if they’re thrown.

Don’t look for Garden State “Only Ones” suppliers Glock, Benelli, and Colt to act like their turn in the barrel might be next. And just what the hell is an “enhanced patrol rifle,” and how does that differ from a “weapon of war designed to quickly kill as many people as possible”?

[Via Jess]

Schooling the Collectivists

The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) has filed a new lawsuit in New Hampshire challenging the unconstitutional search of an 18-year-old high school senior’s vehicle, based solely on the knowledge that he is a legal gun owner. [More]

I see the cowardly bullies and would-be tyrants have limited who can post Facebook comments.

Feel the Bern

With complete republican control in Ohio, there is no excuse for the lack of pro-gun wins in 2025, so let your elected officials know you are displeased with their lack of support for the Second Amendment. [More]

I see it made quite the impression:

Gee, who would’a suspected he’d turn out to be a Vichycon weasel?

Thing is, it looks like the GOA email tool automatically sent a state bill inquiry to a U.S. senator.

You Ain’t Seen Nothin’ Yet!

GOA says “Yikes!”

It’s all part of that bipolarity we’ve been talking about.

Fortunately, there’s a cure. We’ve even got the legal wrangles and alternatives figured out.

Except none of the rice bowl groups want to play. They say they have their own contacts, and apparently perceived exclusivity if their priority. Except that means things get done in secret with our rights that we may not agree with– as has happened before and will happen again — and the bipolar disappointments and flat-out reneging and betrayals will continue, the groups will continue to walk on eggshells so no administration feathers are ruffled, and popular 2A cheerleaders will convince a critical mass that it’s not only a good thing, but masterful 3D chess.

Mass. Hysteria

Three people were hospitalized after they were injured Saturday afternoon in a shooting in Mattapan, according to Boston police. [More]

Huh. We were just talking Boston and the Massachusetts Democrats who won’t let you defend yourself.

So why won’t the purveyors of “our democracy” let the people vote on that? And now Orwellian is “protect[ing] Mass. gun laws from upcoming ballot question” as opposed to protecting the right of citizens to vote on their own safety?

Looks like the violence monopolists succeeded– the measure didn’t make the list.

[Via Edmund M]

Rules for Rules

Sen. Johnson introduces legislation to fix serious problems in Ohio… SB 278 seeks to add teeth to the law by giving individuals the power to seek punitive damages against cities that pass gun control measures… SB 279 would make it illegal for a business, state agency, or political subdivision from preventing an off-duty law enforcement officer from carrying a firearm. [More]

So those who would impose new laws on us willfully violate what’s already on the books with impunity? Yeah, punishing Democrats would be nice. Too bad it’s not the politicians themselves who have to pay but the poor tax slobs they already overburden.

As for off-duty cops, yeah, I know, it’s another carve out for “Only Ones,” but like I said in my Firearms News report exposing the illegal rule at Youngstown State’s stadium and citing existing Ohio Revised Code:

[T]he issue here is YSU officials do not have authority to override state preemption on gun laws and impose local prohibitions.

So, basically, we’re talking two new laws to enforce two existing laws.

And here you thought government was ludicrously overblown, redundant, and wasteful…

We’re the Only Ones Torched Enough

Blue city street takeover suspects torched police cruiser in ‘hell-bent’ attack on cops: union chief [More]

‘Takeover” = conquest. Temporary, for now.

In other words, Democrat cities can’t only not protect you, the Only Ones can’t protect themselves and they won’t allow you to protect yourself.

I wonder what Sam Adams and John Hancock would have had to say about that.

Looking around for more information on Boston lawlessness, I found a hypocritical excuse for a projected homicide increase:

…small increases in homicides look large in percentage terms

What have I been saying about the grabbers using rates to try and paint low population red states with concentrations of blue as more violent? A few incidents within a smaller overall population will yield a higher RATE than many incidents within a larger population.

A New York State of Mind

Repeat Offender With 33 Arrests Kills Brooklyn Church Usher After “Kind” Gesture – His accused killer, a man with 33 arrests, walked free until he met a good man holding a door. And that act of kindness cost an innocent New Yorker his life. [More]

There oughta be a law.

Democrats made sure the guy getting his head repeatedly stomped on was forbiddn by law to defend himself with a gun.

What is it with people holding doors getting murdered by feral retards?

[Via Michael G]

Glock-Blocking

California Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed a law banning sales of one of the most popular types of handgun in the U.S… It covers handguns manufactured by Glock, as well as similarly designed pistols, that use a “cruciform trigger bar,” which lawmakers said makes them easily convertible to fully automatic fire. [More]

So that’s what being “a trusted partner of law enforcement” gets you…

That and “compromising” to save your skin

The “cool” thing is the “Only Ones” exemption is still there! That might actually be what keeps the PLCAA in play, although I’m sure there are Democrat activist federal judges eager to impose nationwide injunctions.

And I’m sure there’ll be no shortage of gun companies eager to keep the enforcers armed and ready to confiscate.

[Via Jess]

Pendant ce Temps, de l’Autre Côté de l’Étang…

Who’s up for losing more sons to save these people from themselves again?

And who’s up for bringing this $#!+ here?

[Via CP]

Just Like the Founders Intended!

Solicitor General Defends NFA Taxation and Registration Scheme for Short-Barreled Rifles… “When it comes to federal gun laws, it’s hard to differentiate the DOJ under Pam Bondi from the DOJ under Merrick Garland. [More]

Would it be catty if I said I’m waiting for Mark Smith to declare “They say that like it’s a bad thing”?

[Via Andy M]

Related UPDATE

Ah, here we go:

The bottom line is the DOJ’s ultimate conclusion is okie dokie with us. But but sort of some of the methodological arguments they made: Not so smoothie poothie.

I get that it might not be the “right” case. That doesn’t excuse the arguments.

On a side note, I haven’t cringed that much since GW said “Pootie-Poot.”

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights