Category: citizen disarmament

The Sentence First, Verdict Afterwards Act

Durbin, Duckworth Join Colleagues To Introduce Legislation To Protect Domestic Abuse Survivors From Gun Violence [More]

Durbin, Duckworth Join Colleagues To Introduce Legislation To Deny Constitutional Rights to the Accused — there, I fixed it for them.

No prognosis yet on GovTrack, but with a Republican House consider this political posturing by the usual gang of rights prohibitionists in anticipation of SCOTUS enraging them in Rahimi.

Assuming the GOP doesn’t blow ’24.

[Via Jess]

Up in Smoke

Did the ATF Just Make Airsoft Smoke Grenades Illegal? [More]

I’d read the notification and made the wrong assumption that this only applied to “government contractors and subcontractors performing explosives operations exclusively pursuant to a current and valid contract with a government agency,” but I guess that part just means they no longer have de facto exemptions.

Having zero experience with the Airsoft community, I wasn’t aware of that aspect.

[Via Jess]

It’s Academic

Based on the above literature and what I know from personal experience, legal possession of firearms must, in addition to already prescribed regulations, bi-yearly be obliged to take a gun-related training course, with fees, or risk having their licence confiscated. Gun owners must also, yearly, be interviewed by authorized personnel to articulate what they have been up to for the year, how they have used their gun over the past year and any problems they have had with their guns, licensing, or any other general concerns. [More]

I’ve talked before about Academia.edu, a website that features papers on all subjects and that I get notifications on when they post on guns. The above is from a 2014 paper, but what this idiot is proposing is useful to bring up now just to show just how delusional the pseudo-eggheads are, and how worthless their infringements against the obedient would be at addressing the real problems.

International Tribunal Lawsuit an Unconstitutional Attempt to Subvert Second Amendment

The same goes for the OAS and its Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, both of which have no authority, legal, moral, or otherwise, to impose their diktats and override “the supreme Law of the Land.” [More]

Our sympathy does not give sufferers leave to lay claim to our rights. And defund the OAS.

We’re the Only Ones Gangsta Enough

Incoming Assn. of Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs board member Jason Zabala previously described his tattoo under oath, saying it depicted a skeleton in a cowboy hat with a smoking rifle and the number 140. He called the stark combination of imagery a “station tattoo,” but others described it as the symbol of a deputy gang known as the Regulators. [More]

So these guys can get off-roster guns and you can’t…

It’s a big club and you ain’t in it.

[Via Steven H]

Again with the Lie

House Republicans just voted to prohibit the CDC from studying gun deaths and gun injuries. [More]

And here I thought it was just to stop tax plunder from being used to stump for citizen disarmament

Dr. Mark Rosenberg, Director of the CDC’s National Center for Injury Control and Prevention (NCIPC) in 1994 told The Washington Post: “We need to revolutionize the way we look at guns, like what we did with cigarettes. Now it [sic] is dirty, deadly, and banned.”

[Via Jess]

No Charge!

The Brooklyn District Attorney had “no choice but to dismiss” Council Member Inna Vernikov’s weapons charge given her gun was “inoperable” … The council member’s charge, criminal possession of a firearm, requires the weapon in question be “capable of firing bullets” — meaning Vernikov’s charges wouldn’t stand, according to the District Attorney’s office. [More]

So New Yorkers can have 80% receivers now…?

Or more likely, they were politically afraid to p!$$ off the wrong group of NY political power players…

Idiot du Jour

We should levy an additional tax on firearms and ammunition to help treat victims, including people who must live with the horror of gun violence. Maybe then gun manufacturers and their supporters would think twice about marketing their wares to unstable, angry customers. [More]

Flesh that out with details for us Dorothy, so everyone can see how clueless you really are.

It looks from “Comments” like nobody’s buying her line of sh!+ either, which, considering where this appeared, is a real positive sign that average Americans are seeing through the absurdity of all the stupid infringements.

[Via Dan Gifford]

Point of Origin

Illinois Assault Weapons Ban Faces New Challenge… The petition argues that Justices Elizabeth Rochford and Mary Kay O’Brien participated in the case despite receiving campaign contributions from those who support the ban. [More]

Now I want you to remember who did the original work that made this possible:

[T]he research and publicity this article has caused has led to a petition with the US Supreme Court on Caperton V Massey grounds, which was first brought up in this piece.

Take it from someone who knows what it’s like to be “bigfooted” out of a story by the media and latecomers.

I’ll probably put something together over the weekend to give this wider exposure. In the meantime, if you see any YouTube gun influencers who don’t give credit to Mom-At-Arms, notify viewers in their video comments.

Verified by MonsterInsights