The Founders Knew About and Had No Problem with ‘Stabilizing Braces’

In light of the Bruen decision, where “text, history, and tradition” of the Second Amendment at the time it was written is what informs us as to what the Founders understood the right to protect, I couldn’t turn to the Borchardt – that would play right into the hands of the gun prohibitionists, who, unable to identify Founding-Era infringements have tried turning to later laws, including post-Civil War edicts intended to keep freed blacks disarmed. [More]

Looking back even further in time, we find plenty of examples from the time the Bill of Rights was ratified proving the people of the Founding Era included pistols with shoulder stocks into the broader category of “arms.”

The Second Amendment is Not a Sporting Arms Popularity Contest

CALIFORNIA CAUGHT! 700,000 Machine Guns Claim Exposed in Duncan v. Bonta Case… [Watch]

Sorry, Mr. Smith, what you, and evidently every prominent voice on “our side” continually miss is that if “in common use at the time” does not cover what is in common use by the infantry, then the Second Amendment is meaningless and all future technological developments will be denied to We the People under the false doctrine of it being “dangerous and unusual.”

And yes, machineguns ARE supposed to be protected, and the tax is a fraudulent infringement imposed by usurping rights swindlers.

It’s “every terrible implement of the soldier.”

I’m probably going to have to write (another) article to elaborate.

More Than One Way to Skin a Cat

America has 20 million AR-15 style rifles in circulation, and more guns than people in the country [More]

No, of course, they don’t have the resources to go after them via the legal system.

Which doesn’t mean they don’t have ruthless plans to eliminate threats to totalitarianism another way…

[Via bondmen]

Blood on Their Hands

The loudest voices politicizing this tragedy are those who attempted to derail vital public services for the severely mentally ill. [More]

They’re also the loudest voices againstthe law” and for disarming the rest of us.

[Via Michael G]

UPDATE

Young American men will be taught the hard way that selflessness, courage, and their masculine instincts will get them 20 to life in prison. [More]

And thanks to “progressives,” everyone loses!

[Via bondmen]

They’re Just Not Making White Supremacists Like They Used To

Seriously? Mauricio Garcia? Light that gas!

And surprise, surprise:

His accounts appear to have since been taken down.

The DSM is once more revealing itself to be puppets and parrots for those whose agenda demands demonizing non-leftist whites as the most violent danger threatening “our democracy,” and of course, gutting the Second Amendment.

Is it true his parents asked for a translator? Was Mauricio a DREAMer?

So he was discharged from the Army over behavioral/mental issues…?

I saw another account that says the mall is a Simon property.

YMMV on this, but it does raise questions you won’t find on CNN.

I’ll use this post as an aggregator for additional info that comes in today, so it will be updated as appropriate.

UPDATE

Will Texas shooting encourage gun reform? [Watch]

Notice the presumption from the get-go that tyranny constitutes”reform.”

[Via 1Gat]

[Via Jess]

More on that Spainhouer fraud

[Via Michael G]

Making Noise

SEN. MENENDEZ, REP. WATSON COLEMAN RENEW BICAMERAL EFFORT TO OUTLAW GUN SILENCERS … “Silencers are not tools of self-defense, they are tools of murder. [More]

That must be why it’s got a law enforcement exception.

The subversive wretch has been trying for years.

It will never get past the Republican House, but it’s useful to once more prove what these totalitarians are about is total control.

UPDATE

Carl Bussjaeger has some thoughts over at Zelman Partisans.

How Could This Have Happened?

The state attorney general’s office is now the lead investigating agency in this quadruple shooting. As we wait to learn more about the victims – including that 7 year old child – and the circumstances that led to this tragedy. [More]

Any bets the perp won’t be well known to “the system”?

[Via @pamnsc]

An Age-Old Question

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Wednesday backed an effort to lower the statewide age requirement to purchase a rifle, calling a current law that bars 18-year-olds from buying firearms “unconstitutional.” [More]

That’s because it is.

I wonder how many Democrats howling in indignant rage over this support lowering the voting age to 16

[Via Jess]

A Good First Step

Delaware County judge blocks Columbus gun ordinance enforcement [More]

But there are still miles to go, this is not the only road to travel, and municipal governments have virtually unlimited tax plunder to throw at this, while rights defenders need to scrape for nickels.

If you’re an Ohio gun owner, are you helping with the load, either financially or through activism?

There’s No Reason for Indiana Statehouse Campus to be a ‘Gun-Free Zone’

That leads to the logical question of why the politicians would be safe when outnumbered by gun owners on one side of an artificial property line, and wouldn’t be if those same gun owners took one step over it, where they would find themselves in violation of the law? [More]

So the right of the government to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed?

Verified by MonsterInsights