Enjoy Dying in Prison

“The coward was your husband. That’s why I killed him…he cried like a baby.” [More]

The coward is the one who executed a defenseless victim. And he’s not only unrepentant, he continues to act belligerently entitled?

Why is it in the taxpayers’ interest to feed, clothe, house, and provide medical attention to this evil piece of crap?

That kind of attitude, it won’t be long.

[Via bondmen]

Thank a Republican

Senate Confirms Biden’s Radical Pick Judge Maldonado for 7th Circuit — Manchin and Sinema Vote Against Nominee — 8 GOP Senators Miss Critical Vote! Full List Below [More]

Why, Ted Cruz (R-TX), Markwayne Mullin (R-OK), Marco Rubio (R-FL), Rand Paul (R-KY), Rick Scott (R-FL), John Hoeven (R-ND), James Risch (R-ID),and Mitt Romney (R-UT)?

[Via Michael G]

As Much Respect for the First as the Second

Liam asserted that the school’s actions in May 2023 violated his First Amendment right to freedom of expression, particularly as a form of “viewpoint discrimination.” Although his speech was censored, the speech of those expressing a different perspective on the same issue was not. [More]

You’re gonna suck it and like it.

Funny, how many rainbows I see

[Via Michael G]

Amy, What You Want to Do?

“Relying exclusively on history and tradition may seem like a way of avoiding judge-made tests,” she wrote in a concurring opinion. “But a rule rendering tradition dispositive is itself a judge-made test. And I do not see a good reason to resolve this case using that approach rather than by adopting a generally applicable principle.” [More]

Between this, Gorsuch playing for the other team, Machine Gun Sammy giving “how to ban” instructions, Kavanaugh looking the Bruen gift horse in the mouth, and Roberts being Roberts, you’ll have to forgive me if I don’t view the bump stock opinion as proof our troubles are over.

I just hope Clarence Thomas doesn’t drop.

How About One Book a Month?

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco has scheduled oral arguments Aug. 14 in the Second Amendment Foundation’s challenge of California’s one-gun-per-month (OGM) purchase restriction, in a case known as Nguyen v. Bonta. [More]

Of course it’s an infringement.

Of course the Ninth Circuit knows it.

And of course they’re going to do everything in their power to stall things until Democrats get the national majority they need to remake SCOTUS and reverse Bruen.

With your money.

The Replacement

So bring in a player for the other team..

This is why taking back the Senate is so critical. Even with the four Republicans abstaining, she was still confirmed along party lines.

[Via Jess]

Oregon’s Judicial Sideshow

While this is a terrible system, one “race” is particularly troubling. The coronation for Appeals Court Judge Position 6. There your “choice” is…Jim Egan. (See “non partisan candidates”) And that should send chills up your spine if you still have any shred of faith in Oregon’s Judicial System. Egan, you may recall, was the “judge” who declared gun owners to be racist, anti-semitic, white supremacists in an unhinged rant against the people’s vote to create a 2nd Amendment Sanctuary in Columbia County. [More]

No one can say that Oregon gun owners haven’t strived mightily to use the ballot box and the jury box… meaning that’s exactly what they don’t say when they accuse us of being violent, hate-filled insurrectionist extremists.

It is fair to wonder how much longer gun owners will be “disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable“…

Stealing It Right in Front of Us

Judge Allows Juror Who ‘Celebrated Trump’s Loss in 2020’ to Stay in Pool [More]

Does anyone really believe this is anything but a partisan plot to let Democrats steal the election because they’re pretty sure that “greatest threat” is too disorganized and perceives it has too much to lose by going kinetic?

[Via bondmen]

Chucks and Balances

Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer said he will strike back with legislation after a court in Texas said it won’t agree to his demand to change how it assigns cases — a seemingly technical issue, but with significant implications for how some major cases are decided. [More]

In other words, so much for separation of power. The repulsive tyrant-in-waiting knows he’s out of bounds so he intends to lay claim to new power. If Republicans are dumb enough to let him.

Get into the weeds at Volokh Conspiracy and Four Boxes Diner.

[Via Jess]

It Depends Upon What the Meaning of the Word ‘Peers’ Is

Justice Alito worries about improperly removing jurors with ‘traditional religious beliefs’ [More]

And if you think that’s a disqualifier, try going through voir dire on a gun case and admitting you’re an NRA member…

[Via Michael G]

From the ‘Our Democracy’ People

Colorado Supreme Court removes Trump from 2024 ballot [More]

These monsters think they can deny millions, most of whom are armed. And anyone who thinks this is about Trump is deliberately missing the point.

I’m breaking my own “easy on the cussing and for the most part avoid it” rule: These motherfucking treasonous Democrat apparatchiks really are bent on starting a civil war. Any president elected under these restrictions will not be legitimate and any orders will be unlawful and morally resistable against enforcers.

You’d better fix this, SCOTUS.

Conduct Unbecoming

US District Court of Southern District of California finds that gun purchase restrictions on 18-20 year olds in California is constitutional under the 2nd Amendment. [More]

What kind of evil, lying traitor would you have to be to rule that way? So much for judicial conduct.

His treason will, of course, eventually be overturned, provided the Republicans don’t blow ’24…

[Via Jess]

Illinois Shows Disinterest in Judicial Conflict Challenge as More Evidence Emerges

It’s fair to ask how, in anyone’s universe, such conduct would not be grounds for removal from the court, disbarment from the practice of law, and criminal prosecution. [More]

Do radical Democrat prohibitionists really want to tell tens of millions of gun owners that the courts are no longer available to them to seek redress against infringements of their fundamental rights?

Who Will Judge the Judges?

The public defender’s office also filed a motion explaining that Bouzy’s mother tried to get her son mental health treatment but failed. They say the mother tried to Baker Act Bouzy days before he hit deputies, but for some reason, the court rejected his mother’s request twice. Before that, there were 15 Baker Act proceedings in his criminal record that his lawyers point to as evidence of his mental illness. [More]

But…but…but licensing. Registration…

I was going to say anyone who can’t be trusted with a car, but it looks like we also need to add “with a gavel”…

[Via Edmund M]

Judicial System Reeks with Democrat Political Bias Against Guns and More

They’re not only conflicted but hiding it. You don’t get more in-your-face corrupt than that. But don’t look for the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board to care. [More]

What good is having your day in court when the judge is in bed with the offending politicians?

Point/Counterpoint

And here come the narrative media denials

I’d say this has risen to the court/election interference level where it warrants a Justice Department subpoena and investigation to see who’s playing whom…

Who would be against it?

Verified by MonsterInsights