None Dare Call It Treason

The op-ed advocates doing away entirely with the Constitution. Why? The authors don’t quite put it this way, but the reason is that the Constitution fails to establish a pure democracy by plebiscite, and makes it difficult to use a transient majority to effect radical change. [More]

Then those who would rule us and who control all major means of communication wouldn’t need to just ignore it anymore.

It figures The New York Times would publish such a subversive screed. As for the ivory tower Harvard and Yale apparatchiks, when useful idiots are no longer needed, that which they’re helping bring into being generally finds a suitable place for “new people.”

[Via Michael G]

Speaking of Toxic Messengers…

Are gun advertisements in FTC’s crosshairs? Critics decry ‘toxic’ messaging as firearm sales soar [More]

If tyrants don’t respect the Second, why should the First bother them any?

It figures this subversion originated with the monopoly of violence apparatchiks over at  USA Today, a Gannett Publication

[Via Remarks]

When in Doubt, Resort to Alinsky Rule 5

Is junior okay? [More]

He’s better than you, shameless apologist for fascists. A “phoenix”? Really? From the ashes of Democrat cities?

And I notice none of his legitimate concerns are being addressed. It figures the Daily News would call this a “meltdown.”

I didn’t realize HRT was involved. I remember a real meltdown I caused with one of their jackboot lickers when I asked a simple question.

The Legion of Superheroes

“Having recently gone through a time of intense crisis, I now understand that I am suffering complex mental health issues…” [More]

Thank you, Captain Obvious!

The other ones either suffering complex mental health issues or just being whores for their jobs are the “Authorized Journalists”  who indulge and encourage such utter nonsense by referring to a singular person as “they.”

And is/are he/they microaggressing against himself/themselves when he/they says/say “I” instead of “we”?

How many spirits does The Guardian’s Australian Deputy Culture Editor think are in there, and why is it there’s never a herd of swine around when you need one?

Meanwhile, back at the farm, it looks like he’s setting things up to become a leading anti-gun spokesman, what with leaving them lying around with kids, and a one-year-old “pick[ing] up a loose bullet [sic] and put[ting] it in her mouth.”

Other Tools Besides Banning…

Repression, Terror, Fear: The Government Wants to Silence the Opposition [More]

Making this all the more believable.

Aided and abetted by social media and the DSM. One fantasy I have is that someday, government collusion with these “private” entities to suppress truthful reporting will be proven in court and First Amendment violators, both government instigators, and their de facto “agents,” will receive the punishments they deserve.

[Via bondmen]

Doing the Job Government Can’t Do — Yet

They tell me that “your content has violated our Misleading Content policy. Please visit our Community Guidelines page blah, blah, blah”. Whatever. [More]

I confess I know next to nothing about this blog– I saw a post about censorship over at WRSA and that caught my interest seeing as how that’s exactly the reason I had to go through all the hassle of abandoning my Blogspot home of 17 years and starting this continuation blog. I see he, too, is the victim of a new Google censorship focus, which means no matter what he does, there are no assurances that work he spends portions of his life on won’t be summarily removed with no warning and no recourse.

Fortunately, that most invaluable of resources, the Internet Archive/ Wayback Machine* had his back on this one. I don’t see what the problem was with it, but then again, I saw no problem with what I posted either.

I’ve been throwing some money their way once a year because I do find them so indispensable. Case in point: All my Examiner “Gunwalker” stuff would be gone from the net if not for them. And doesn’t that tell you just about everything you need to know about the DSM

Oh, Well This Proves EVERYTHING

Well, it turns out there are photos. And here they are, published for the first time. [More]

And this made the ever-sold-out Drudge.

Sr. Bedoya, the floor is yours:

Admissible evidence? We ain’t got no admissible evidence. We don’t need no admissible evidence. I don’t have to show you any stinking admissible evidence!

Is this really all they want us to need? What honest man wouldn’t rebel against that?

Funny. They don’t invite comments.

Return of the Swamp Thing

“In our nation’s 246-year history, there has never been an individual who is a greater threat to our republic than Donald Trump. He tried to steal the last election using lies and violence to keep himself in power after the voters had rejected him,” the elder Cheney says in the ad, which the younger Cheney started running on Thursday, a week and a half before she faces a Trump-endorsed challenger in the Republican congressional primary Wyoming’s single congressional seat. [More]

And by “Trump” he means anyone who supported the agenda he campaigned on and who still doubts the official J6 narrative.

This is what someone the DSM calls a “staunch gun advocate” with ultra-establishment insider loyalties looks like:

“Whether or not there’s some measure there in terms of limiting the size of the magazine that you can buy to go with a semiautomatic weapon — we’ve had that in place before. Maybe it’s appropriate to re-establish that kind of thing…

Hey Dick: Don’t you have somebody to shoot in the face or something?

(This came across the transom after I submitted my latest AmmoLand piece on Liz Cheney getting longtime gun-grabber Kevin Costner’s support, which may be out later today.)

UPDATE

Here.

This is CNN

Hundreds of words devoted to smearing an entire police force as racist, as so racist they would rather be unemployed than work for a black person… And only after 18 — 18! — paragraphs do these lying pigs come across with the truth: that these same people had no problem working under a black town manager before. [More]

Yeah, I kinda figured it was just her

Thing is, those CNN propaganda subjects will never know the rest of the story, will they?

Just as intended.

[Via Michael G]

This is CNN

A whirlwind few days in Washington have upended perceptions of Trump’s political and legal jeopardy related to his attempted coup after he lost the 2020 election. [More]

Has he been charged? Has he been tried? Has he been convicted?

Yet CNN just concluded for millions dumb enough to turn to it for news that Trump attempted a coup.

Yet the guy caught dead to rights on camera threatening to stab a campaigning Republican is an “alleged attacker.”

No Comment

Daniel Defense did not respond to multiple requests from The Washington Post for comment. [More]

Why should they give you @$$holes the time of day, when the only reasonable conclusion would be you’re setting up a hit piece?

You just had to stick “the maker of the gun used in the Uvalde shooting” into the subhead, didn’t you, WaPo?

How unsurprising.

[Via Jess]

When Fractions of a Second Count

The fingerprint reader unlocks the gun in microseconds, but since it may not work when wet or in other adverse conditions, the PIN pad is there as a backup. LodeStar did not demonstrate the near-field communication signal, but it would act as a secondary backup, enabling the gun as quickly as users can open the app on their phones. [More]

Second time this morning I’ve channeled my inner Family Guy…

I may have to reconsider my position on suing gun manufacturers…

MSNBorgC

Cowardly DSM apparatchik Lawrence O’Donnell spreads the fear-mongering message that “Resistance is futile.” [Watch]

The scenario he presents of armed teachers congregating in the hallway is hardly the only option, nor even a tactically sound or likely one. And his solution is apparently to have “Only Ones” afraid to face one guy with an AR-15 go after the untold millions he wants to ban.

[Via 1Gat]

Speaking of Layers of Deception…

The campaign to discredit Cassidy Hutchinson has begun [More]

Leave it to The Los Angeles Times to cover up the disconnects and act as a megaphone for the kangaroo court.

The plan, of course, is to goad the agents into appearing so they can betray the trust of their appointments and be asked questions to elicit recollections of statements that can be used to further smear.

Question: Can’t the committee compel testimony if it really wants it?

It Depends Upon What the Meaning of the Word ‘Conservative’ Is

Former Obama spin artist Dan Pfeiffer wrote this in one of his regular articles for the glossy left-wing rag Vanity Fair: “the conservative media dwarfs the progressive media in size and scope.” [More]

When you remember “conservative” is a relative term based on time and place, he’s got a point.

[Via Michael G]

Verified by MonsterInsights