Category: DSM

Thanks for the Highly-Publicized Concessions!

He says it’s crucial to have laws to keep guns out of the hands of individuals who aren’t able to handle them responsibly… He also says it’s legitimate and “reasonable” to question which types of firearms, accessories and ammunition should be in wide circulation, particularly high-capacity magazines. [More]

The first is an impossibility unless they are in custody, which requires full due process, and the second is typical Fuddspeak.

It’s not about hunting or “sportsmen” or hobbies. It’s about freedom.

And, of course, the piece ends with misdirecting Bloomberg propaganda that effectively undermines every attempt the guy has made to appear reasonable. If the media approaches you for an interview and you think they’re going to give you a fair shake, think again. They’re looking to use you.

[Via Mack H]

Shame on You

Stop tolerating gun extremists. Shame them. [More]

If anybody should be ashamed, Quentin, it’s you.

Funny– you pick a fight but don’t provide a way to comment.

Crouch down and lick.

It’s not like someone who is willingly contemptible could stop someone equipped to demand it of you — or of anyone you are morally obligated to protect.

What a tool.

[Via Michael G]

Nothing to See Here

DHS has a program gathering domestic intelligence — and virtually no one knows about it [More]

In fairness, most of the DSM has been busy parroting the narrative du jour and they aren’t really intended or qualified to do any “real reporting.”

Besides, it’s not like most Americans will ever read this or grasp the implications and do something about them if they did.

[Via bondmen]

It Depends Upon What the Meaning of the Word ‘Demolish’ Is

Watch Jon Stewart Demolish the Arguments of Republican State Senator That More Guns Make Us Safer: ‘Would a Billion Guns Do It?’ [More]

No, he didn’t.

He made the same old stupid and demonstrably flawed arguments the antis always do, but they’re counting on DSM hacks like Eileen AJ Connelly being biased and ignorant enough to gush over them.

[Via Dan Gifford]

Speaking of Idolatry…

Are Guns The New “Golden Calf”? [More]

And here I thought they were penis compensators.

It figures the Newsraper of Record is driving this,

Who are the ones erecting “faith” statues?

This is projection by those who reject reason and rely on government-worshiping zealots, pure and simple.

That and they’re counting on what government does to armed “apostates.”

[Via Michael G]

Spider & the Fly

The Bilious Bullies of Black Lives Matter – The Latest from BLM and Their Violent Far-Left Sympathizers [More]

The communists have a critical mass of useful idiots convinced that if you oppose totalitarianism you’re a racist to be “canceled” and destroyed.

Hence what we saw happen this weekend with Scott Adams, with the full and enthusiastic “leadership” of the DSM.

Lies, Damned Lies, and…

Gun violence in US and what the statistics tell us [More]

I think they mean what selectively presented statistics tell us. For instance, you’d think in any honest analysis of the issue, stuff like who’s doing the violence and where it’s being done would be a foremost concern, instead of, you know, being deliberately omitted.

There are plenty of false conclusions being implied, as well. Case in point, it looks like “gun rights” groups outspend the prohibitionists, and some “gun pundits” are considering that as proof that “we” are winning.

That ignores grassroots vs. Astroturf, and leaves the most important consideration unsaid: The grabbers don’t have to spend as much. The government, with virtually unlimited tax plunder, is carrying the lion’s share of the legal costs, and the media provides all the free publicity they want while ignoring or deliberately suppressing the truth, as evidenced by the second link, above.

[Via Jess]

Exactly the Model

Yes: Tobacco. The tobacco industry is exactly the model that I think of in terms of the decades of work that it will take to address this issue.” [More]

You know, “dirty, deadly, and banned.”

But no one is talking about taking your guns.

As an aside, “journalist” Rita Braver, with her practiced “empathy,” is obviously performing for the camera. I wonder how many viewers realized that was to manipulate their emotions while they were being presented with only one side and the wrong side at that.

What can I say but “CBS“?

[Via Jess]

Adventures in Baselessness

Media pillar admits ‘potential vulnerabilities,’ ‘security challenges’ in electronic pollbooks – But Associated Press frets about possible exploitation of issues by purveyors of “election conspiracies” and continues to advocate use of the devices. [More]

So if it’s corrupt they don’t want anybody acting on it?

[Via Michael G]

Verified by MonsterInsights