Notes from the Resistance
Joe Biden announces that the 2A was ‘never absolute’ and all that talk about the tree of liberty is ‘crap’ [More]
Me, I’m hoping those swing state poll numbers hold.
In which case we’ll see about that.
WE may get a good preview of things to come at the Democrat Convention.
[Via bondmen]
Additionally, it barred illegal aliens and other foreign citizens from collecting voter registration forms, though that portion of the law was struck down in March by an Obama-appointee. [More]
The South Park succubus comes to mind.
[Via Michael G]
It was a party that fought for civil liberties and rights, remembering how neighbors and friends were thrown in Japanese internment camps during World War II, their freedoms taken away in an instant. It was a party inspired by JFK and the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., who showed us what is possible when we as Americans come together. [More]
It was the party that threw those citizens into the camps and led the filibuster against the Civil Rights Act.
I welcome the noises she’s making but I still don’t trust her.
Contorting, lol. And I never said, or even suggested, any of that. The 3% just objectively proves you were wrong about A+ meaning you always have to be right–it doesn’t imply anything about subjective weights of infringements. [More]
I’m moving the “debate” here because it’s bad form to hijack another man’s post with an argument, because it doesn’t limit me to 280 characters, and because I basically use “advocacy media” to promote my work, so as long as I’m doing it, why limit eyeballs?
The thread with the back-and-forths starts here. My response to this latest:
Not “wrong,” just not expecting you to argue a formal academic scale instead of one of principle. My assumption was you were saying helping Gonzales return to power only counted 3% against a grade of 100. I just didn’t realize what you were talking about because it struck me as so off-topic.
My mistake was accepting your distracting from the real issue with non sequiturs about 3% and age and four terms. It’s simple: Abbot is enabling a Quisling who sold us out to Biden’s tyranny and will predictably do so again. And you’re excusing him and doing so helps the establishment GOP exclude new and principled contenders, with no disincentives. So from my point of view, the one who “always has to be right” is the one evading that reality to instead try and score an irrelevant “gotcha.”
To me, real 2A fidelity means 100%, kind of like the reverse of you can’t be a little bit pregnant. Maybe it means something different to you.
And the “Bipartisan bill” did more than create new opportunities for ATF to destroy lives and kill your fellow gun owners on private sales. They’re extending the net for all it’s worth.
LOL, no. You are welcome to write what you want wherever you want, but I’m under no obligation to obey your unilateral dictates. Have fun with that, though.
When we checked, the only candidate whose website listed this group as “endorsing” them was Goodwin. Two candidates we contacted had never heard of them and had not requested, and were unaware of, the endorsements. Hilariously, the website twice misquoted the Second Amendment as “the right to bear and keep arms.” [More]
But Democrats are the only ones laughing.
‘A lot would have to go wrong for Biden to lose’ [More]
That H. L. Mencken: Him plenty smart fella.
If any more goes wrong, who says there’ll be an election?
EXCLUSIVE: America First Policy Institute Demands Key Battleground States Enforce Ban On Non-Citizen Voting [More]
And if they don’t?
Parroting a press release ain’t exactly a scoop, guys…
But The New York Times reported in early April that covert Chinese accounts are masquerading as supporters of former President Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee. These accounts are also promoting conspiracy theories, stoking domestic divisions and attacking Biden ahead of the election in November. [More]
Just to be clear, when election fraud allegations point at Democrats, they’re “baseless.”
And since “Russian collusion” didn’t work, we’ll just change the meme to “Chinese.”
Bannon: House Republicans secretly want Trump to lose [More]
Remember what Prof. Quigley said:
“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy”
And guess who took that to heart.
Judge Allows Juror Who ‘Celebrated Trump’s Loss in 2020’ to Stay in Pool [More]
Does anyone really believe this is anything but a partisan plot to let Democrats steal the election because they’re pretty sure that “greatest threat” is too disorganized and perceives it has too much to lose by going kinetic?
[Via bondmen]
Unofficial Voter Registration Site Collects Pennsylvanians’ Info For ‘Political Activities’ [More]
What kind of slimy bastards would resort to such deception?
And there’s another thing Democrats Schwank and Costa have in common…
Hey, if you see something say something…
[Via Michael G]
Good thing this has nothing to do with that “single issue.” And I have that on good authority.
And still, no “single issue” deflector or open borders “libertarian” will take my challenge.
It’s Game Over for Election Fraud Deniers! [More]
Stop me if you’ve heard this one before.
Wake me when the narrative changes.
The dolts are bound and determined to lose to the pants pooper.
How many also voted for the Biden Gungrab?
So it’s safe to assume everyone trolling Biggs on this is for warrantless searches. As long as it applies to their enemies.
Of bigger concern: Is Trump trying to blow it?
Drudge Report, the granddaddy of conservative aggregation, was down 81 percent; [More]
Well, now we know this report is a psyops lie. And if that’s what the public is being told is “conservative,” anyone to the right of it is a de facto raving rightwing extremist.
The timing looks like it’s intended to erode “Republican” confidence leading into the election.
If numbers ARE down, and I’m not just taking the word of agenda pushers for it, let’s take a look at how much of that is algorithm manipulation and suppression. And let’s also look at reading-averse traffic shifting over to video “influencers,” which is a trend I think gun owners need to be real careful with.
How Taxpayers Will Heavily Subsidize Democrat Boots on the Ground This Election [More]
Just think of it as a down payment on a bullet fee.
[Via Michael G]
But they overlooked a state law in Ohio, and the party now faces the possibility that Joe Biden’s name won’t be listed as a presidential candidate in the fall… The law came to the attention of Democrats recently when Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose notified them. [More]
Gee, thanks, Frank,
And that, along with flirting with No Labels and being a dolt during Covid, is why a flip-flopping gun fraud kicked his @$$.
In Opposite Day Logic, USA Today Breathlessly Defends ‘Zuckerbucks’ [More]
Glad to see the term catching on…
And what else would we expect?
[Via Michael G]
But more than a third of the elite 1% he surveyed would condone cheating. And among those who are “politically obsessed” – meaning that they talk about politics every day – that number shot up to 69%… Keep in mind that this elite 1% group is overwhelmingly liberal. According to Rasmussen, these are mainly well-educated urbanites who make more than $150,000 a year and think Joe Biden is doing a great job. Nearly three-quarters identify as Democrats. [More]
Our moral superiors who consider us “deplorables”…
They really are degenerates in just about every way.
[Via bondmen]
Garland’s comments come in an election year when violent crime is a major campaign issue, and one that Biden’s opponent, former President Donald Trump has attacked him on. [More]
By their motivation ye shall know them.
And guess what they deliberately don’t mention when they assure us violent crime is down.
[Via Jess]
Wisconsin voters approved two constitutional amendment proposals Tuesday that prohibit private money from being used to conduct elections and mandate only legally designated government officials may administer elections. This makes Wisconsin the 28th state to ban “Zuckbucks”-style electioneering and the second to do so by constitutional amendment. [More]
So, if they’re capable of being rational about elections, what the hell is this about?
Or am I making an assumption that ignores the same First Amendment abridgements that made McCain-Feingold so objectionable?
Feel free to edumacate me on similarities and differences.
[Via Michael G]
“The biggest problem in GOP fundraising is that we don’t treat donors well”- It rings true to me. We’ve endured three years of abusive Republican text and email solicititations after a single donation through WinRed. [More]
Donate through WinRed and money gets apportioned out to this.
And…
[Via Michael G]
