‘Republicans for Allred’ Coalition Stacked With Former GOP Losers [More]
They’re all Reds…
Leave it to Opposite Day “progressives” to call liabilities assets.
Everybody remember this…?
[Via Sweet Babboo]
Notes from the Resistance
‘Republicans for Allred’ Coalition Stacked With Former GOP Losers [More]
They’re all Reds…
Leave it to Opposite Day “progressives” to call liabilities assets.
Everybody remember this…?
[Via Sweet Babboo]

Look, the guy may be great on guns, but it shouldn’t be this hard finding out. [More]
If you’re not prepared to champion and defend RKBA, anytime, anywhere, and if you think it’s something you need to keep a low profile on to avoid political embarrasment, you’re not doing it right and you’re not prepared to lead.

Meta Accused of Suppressing Voter Guide Information on Facebook [More]
“Community standards,” you know…
And Zuck thinks a bunker will save him…
[Via Sweet Babboo]
Related UPDATE
Bill Gates’ Microsoft says “Hold our beer.”
[Via Michael G]
“As of today, there has been no response from you or your Department regarding the inquiry on July 12, 2024, seeking information on efforts undertaken by your Department to enforce laws prohibiting non-citizen voting. Given that the 2024 Presidential Election is in less than 34 days, your Department’s inaction and refusal to provide any information regarding its efforts to promote public trust and confidence in our elections is especially alarming,” they wrote. [More]
DOJ stonewalling Congress on serious crimes…?
Oh, go on…
And if they can get away with it with them, what chance does the little guy have?
Throughout the document, Smith argues that the actions Trump took to overturn the election were in his private capacity – as a candidate – rather than in his official capacity, as a president. [More]
Speaking of acting in a private capacity, how is that not what election interference apparatchik Smith is doing, and why can’t (haven’t) Republicans and SCOTUS put an immediate halt to it?

The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms says California Gov. Gavin Newsom is a hypocrite for signing a law barring local governments from requiring voter identification, while still expecting gun buyers to provide ID before exercising their Second Amendment rights. [More]
So… does this mean they’re reconsidering…?
The National Partnership for New Americans is a group funded by George Soros that has been naturalizing hundreds of thousands of individuals — at least a quarter of a million of them. “Their goal is to continue to naturalize these migrants and make them into voters,” Wheeler explains. [More]
Good thing this has nothing to do with that “single issue.” And I have that on good authority.
DOJ sues Alabama, state’s top election official for allegedly purging noncitizen voters too close to election [More]
That’s the reason? Really?
As opposed to DOJ being embedded domestic enemies plotting a coup to impose tyranny?

While it seems unlikely that anyone who reading this would miss a vote, the reality is many gun owners do not register to vote or return their ballots. [More]
I kind of understand a fatalistic TINVOWOOT impulse. But I don’t get profiles in apathy. Or rejecting a self-defense tactic. I will keep trying with the tools at hand.
And I haven’t seen anyone who does plan on staying above us all flesh out a feasible plan for during whatever war may result and afterward, when rule by somebody is reestablished.
The other thing I haven’t seen from those who refuse to participate is a credible history of personal involvement working the system they reject.
My analogy is climbing out of a well. I’d rather start closer to the top than at the bottom, which is where a Kamala win will lead us. And my question for those who say “Bring it” is, what are you waiting for? When things get worse, the time will not be more opportune.
Their sign, supporting President Trump, went up. And a policeman knocked on their door. “He told them that he had been directed to go door to door to families that had political signs in their yards and order them to remove the signs. This order was so egregious that our clients thought it was a joke, but the officer confirmed the order; they had to take down their sign,” the report said. [More]
“A policeman…”
“The officer…”
What’s the dumb-ass thug’s name, and is he still feeding at the trough?
There is no order an oathbreaker will not obey, hence the desperation of the totalitarians to demonize Oath Keepers.
And if said dumb-ass thug weren’t a thug and a dumb-ass, he’d have refused the order and denounced it, and retired in style on the settlement if they’d dared retaliate.
Leaders in Frederick, Maryland, Approve Voting by Non-Citizens in Local Elections- “Alderman Ben MacShane said he was excited to support the change as a way to value and include everyone in the community.” [More]
Makes sense. Funny, how you never find one of these types who don’t also want your guns.
The guy just oozes, doesn’t he?
[Via Michael G]
“The Committee seeks to determine whether the Biden-Harris Administration attempted to use a foreign leader to benefit Vice President Harris’ presidential campaign and, if so, necessarily committed an abuse of power,” Comer wrote. [More]
Of course it did. On both counts. And promises were made in exchange for the endorsement.
“Wild guess, we’re due for a fake assassination attempt on Kamala they’ll blame on Trumpy rhetoric. Dominant storyline the next 6 weeks.” [More]
Another wild guess: Setting the narrative stage.
[Via Michael G]
Rep. Dan S. Goldman (D-NY), a former aide to Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and heir to the Levi Strauss fortune, said Wednesday that former President Donald Trump intends to “execute a coup” on January 6, 2025, if he loses the race. [More]
I haven’t heard from this nepo piece of crap for a while and now we get him spreading dangerous lies twice in one day?
As an aside, I hope no one here is still buying Levis.
[Via bondmen]

This guide estimates where candidates stand on gun issues by comparing their views with those of a control group of gun owners. As noted below, a “4-STAR” candidate agrees with the control group on at least 90% of gun issues, a 3-STAR agrees on least 80%, a 2-STAR on at least 70%, a 1-STAR on at least 60%, and a 0-STAR candidate agrees on less than 60% of gun issues. [More]
It’s a place to start and will no doubt be “single issue” strong.
I’d like to see the criteria and if “the greatest threat” is considered.