Highland Park Mayor Says Armed Good Guy Could Not Have Stopped Rampage [More]
And her qualifications for making that pronouncement, aside from being an ignorant c*** with political power and a media megaphone are…?
[Via bondmen]
Notes from the Resistance
Dianne Feinstein tells WarOnGuns Correspondent 1Gat and the rest of us to go **** ourselves in the most polite way possible. [More]
Sending prewritten letters to some is just a waste of activist time and if this happens enough times their understandable response will be “Why bother?”
In an attempt to subvert the Supreme Court’s clear directions in the Bruen decision, California’s gun grabbing Democrats have actually made their case weaker through their own arguments. [More]
What did Napoleon supposedly say about this?
[Via Michael G]
“So, to clarify, Mr. Chairman, you’re saying it is the point of the bill to ban weapons that are in common use in the United States today,” the Republican representative pressed.
“Yes,” Nadler clarified. “The problem is that they’re in common use.” [More]
The response will be no laughing matter.
[Via Michael G]
“My friend from Texas, Mr. Roy, advances the so-called insurrectionist view of the second amendment, that the second amendment’s purpose is to give the people the right to overthrow or fight our government or fight the police or threaten armed resistance if the government is somehow being unfair or unjust,” Raskin said. “This reading is totally and absolutely absurd and flies in the face of the place text of the constitution.” [More]
Don’t tell us. Tell Alexander Hamilton:
If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government…
That and he’s not your friend, buddy…

SCHIFF BILL TO REPEAL GUN INDUSTRY LIABILITY SHIELD PASSED OUT OF COMMITTEE [More]
It’s instructive to see that the goal really is total disarmament, but the creepy punk is just whoring for headlines here and knows this isn’t going anywhere:
Cosponsors: 72 Cosponsors (72 Democrats)
Prognosis2% chance of being enacted according to Skopos Labs
Figures he and his fellow seditious conspirators put the term “Equal Access” in the title of a bill designed to make guns too expensive for “those people.”

Constitutional law expert Alan Dershowitz told Newsmax on Tuesday that the Jan. 6 committee ”does not want the public to hear the other side” of the narrative it is presenting in prime time. “That’s why it didn’t permit any cross-examination, any confrontation, any due process, anything resembling fairness”… [More]
Which is why none of them are interested in publicly questioning why Michael Byrd was given a pass for executing Ashli Babbitt when we all know how this country would have erupted in flames had a white officer shot an unarmed black woman and then been “exonerated” in a behind-the-scenes CYA session.
“Republican” Liz Cheney wants it that way.
David Hogg removed from congressional hearing after angry outburst over guns [More]
Just the person we should listen to on controlling the rest of us– some little fascist who can’t control himself!
The assault weapons ban hearing is going about as well as you would imagine. Booker asks what the difference is between a semi auto rifle and semi auto handgun. When he gets an answer he doesn’t like, he immediately pivots to Dr. Fuddlore pic.twitter.com/3OooAkZYDg
— Bad Weapon Takes (@BadWeaponTakes) July 20, 2022
He deliberately spreads a narrative talking point lie about destructive power.
And the “expert” he turns to tells two flat-out lies– first, the VPC deception, that the grabbers refuse to acknowledge because they rely on ignorance:
The weapons’ menacing looks, coupled with the public’s confusion over fully automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons—anything that looks like a machine gun is assumed to be a machine gun—can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons.
And secondly, the history behind the development of the AR-15, confirmed by ATF in a FOIA response:
“Colt sent a pilot model rifle (serial no. GX4968) to the BATF for civilian sale approval on Oct. 23, 1963. It was approved on Dec. 10, 1963, and sales of the ‘Model R6000 Colt AR-15 SP1 Sporter Rifle’ began on Jan 2, 1964,” one critic of the article contended. “The M16 wasn’t issued to infantry units until 1965 (as the XM16E1), wasn’t standardized as the M16A1 until 1967, and didn’t officially replace the M14 until 1969.”
[Via WiscoDave]
China Blames Systemic Racism for Uvalde Massacre [More]
I wonder if they’d appreciate an #ArmTheUyghurs hashtag…
[Via bondmen]
Illinois governor makes it easier for police to reject gun licenses – The rule change directs Illinois State Police to more broadly use “clear and present danger” reports to deny or revoke Firearm Owner ID cards. [More]
Pig Pritzker channels his inner Gold Hat:
Due process? We ain’t got no due process. We don’t need no due process. I don’t have to show you any stinking due process!
And who better to be the arbiters than the “Only Ones” who say instead of shooting attackers, women should vomit?
Assuming they can still define “woman”…
[Via Jess]
“Whiteness,” Stewart declares, “is itself violence.” [More]
How non-violent of hi… sorry, I’m not sure which pronoun to use to keep from offending those asserting their racial and gender superiority over me…
In any case, I think I’ve already seen this movie.
[Via Michael G]
Charges Dropped Against The “Colbert 9” After Illegal Entry Into Capitol [More]
And guess by who.
It’s almost like there are two systems of justice in this country…
[Via Michael G]
Notwithstanding any other law, any person, including an entity, attorney, or law firm, who seeks declaratory or injunctive relief to prevent this state, a political subdivision, a governmental entity or public official in this state, or a person in this state from enforcing any statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any other type of law that regulates or restricts firearms, or that represents any litigant seeking that relief, is jointly and severally liable to pay the attorney’s fees and costs of the prevailing party…. Any person, including an entity, attorney, or law firm, who seeks declaratory or injunctive relief as described in subdivision (a), shall not be deemed a prevailing party under this section or any other provision of this chapter. [More]
Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith explains how this will financially intimidate challengers of California citizen disarmament edicts.
[Via Jess]
America is in a state of revolution. It’s not the kind of revolution with competing armies or a coup d’état. It’s an invisible revolution along the axes of race, gender, and identity that is shaking the foundations of our country. I’ll show you exactly how we got here and what we can do to push back. [Watch]
Recall that Marcuse was wholly enabled by our government and academic elites.
Sorry, but “we’re” so far gone, the “push back” seems way too little, way too late, and way too demanding of a culture steeped in ignorance, laziness, and apathy. Course reversal like what is needed doesn’t happen without a more “hands-on” approach, and for that, expect only a small segment of the populace, maybe three percent, to actively participate at any given time.
[Via Agustin B]