Notes from the Resistance
What is clear is someone with motives of their own, knowing full well that their complaining to police could result in this man’s loss of freedom (or worse) took advantage of the disarmed snitch culture encouraged by authorities in order to destroy his life. [More]
Their own government gives new meaning to the phrase “Close your eyes and think of England.”
Gun owners who pay attention to his confirmation hearings will have a chance to hear for themselves, and see how Cekada’s answers, especially to questions posed by anti-gun Democrats, comport with being “truly pro-Second Amendment.” [More]
“He won’t betray us as much” seems a heck of a standard to applaud.
“What I try to do with these things is show readers a politician will go beyond platitudes and demonstrate an understanding of concerns and developments the constituents are expressing and following”… [More]
The Second Amendment is the sole focus of this article, not any other policy issues or the reasons Trump wants to end Massie’s political career, nor Massie’s reasons for opposing parts of the president’s agenda.
Upholding Hawaii’s disarmament edict “fails every aspect of the analytical framework established by Bruen,” Beck and Petitioner Co-Counsel Mark W. Pennack argue. [More]
It’s difficult to conceive how the same court that gave us Bruen could agree that the Founders would have been cool with ubiquitous infringements.
And the best way to keep killers from succeeding is by being able to stop them. [More]
Prohibitionists will do anything to avoid the obvious– besides, it ain’t their money.
We’re going north to Alaska this morning.
I’ll be joining the show at 10 AM Eastern.
Nothin’ in particular, we’re just gonna talk.
A more honest political mailer would have simply admitted “Democrats would rather see you dead than armed.” [More]
Funny, how all the lies Democrats rely on are old, long-since exposed ones,
The Nov. 2025 issue of Firearms News, with my article, “Ohio County Fair ‘No Guns” Signs are Unacceptable Insults to Armed Patrons,” is now available at diverse and inclusive newsstands throughout the Republic.
Or you could just save yourself a trip and plenty of money off the cover price by subscribing…
Logically, if you’re going to ban guns and drinking in business establishments, why wouldn’t you preemptively demand the same controls in homes, the places where “domestic violence” can take place? [More]
I need a drink.
In this episode of Armed American Radio, host Mark Walters discusses the implications of Glock’s recent business decisions and their impact on the firearms industry. Joined by David Codrea, they explore the intersection of gun rights, political strategy, and the responsibilities of gun manufacturers. [Listen]
Yesterday’s show…
Show an enemy committed to your destruction you’re not willing to fight to the hilt and don’t expect that to do anything but embolden them. [More]
With a slow fist coming, you’d think more effort would be put into stopping it.
Are we certain, from our brief and privileged vantage point, that our familiar way of life will forever be the norm, when everything that has gone before us shows we are, instead, the extremely lucky beneficiaries of a rare and fortunate convergence of circumstances, and one that has only been preserved under the force of arms? [More]
My fourth and final “Gun Rights” column for the last issue of American Handgunner, which has discontinued going to print…
Equally unsurprising, but nonetheless very revealing, is that none of the so-called “gun safety groups” that have come out for Jones are rescinding their endorsements. [More]
Maybe the cat’s got their tongue… And why does it look like the Brady group is trying to quietly erase their endorsement…?
I have three articles this time out:
Pick up a copy at a diverse and inclusive newsstand near you.
Cardinal Mooney posted an information sheet on Facebook detailing prohibited behaviors and items. Among them are “Weapons of any kind, including off-duty law enforcement, weapons, pipes, knives or chains.” [More]
It’s not so much a matter of sticking up for “Only Ones” exclusivity as one of not allowing local entities to undermine preemption and overrule state law.
AmmoLand Needs You in the Fight for Freedom [More]
I’m reiterating my “Appeal to Heaven.”
If you get value, why wouldn’t you give some in return?
What, you’ll just go to “another” gun site? Then you’ll miss out on exclusives nobody else has.
See, I only ever ask readers one thing for me, and it’s never money. My clients and friends on the other hand…
I just got my copy of the November/December 2025 issue in the mail, featuring my Gun Rights article, “Is the Second Amendment an Obsolete Relic of Another Time?” on pg. 73.
This is my fourth (and looks like final) column for this magazine since they announced they are discontinuing print editions. As for going forward with a digital publication, so far no one has approached me and I figure right now they’re all scrambling to adjust, adapt, and see what continuation will look like.
You might want to see if you can pick up a copy at your local news stand because the last issue of a magazine that has been published for over half a century might be a collector’s item some day.
Why were those 10 citizens chosen? What do they have that “we” don’t? Or more to the point, what do we also have that they do? [More]
Why, when there’s an easy way, does the “pro-gun” DOJ so often choose the hard way?
“Alberta’s government is exploring various options with provincial, territorial, and federal counterparts and external stakeholders to protect law-abiding firearms owners from federal overreach.” [More]
There’s still a long way to go, but it should not go unnoticed that some Canadian officials sound a lot better than Blue State Democrats.
