The One to Watch

Bloomberg Law’s take on the Court’s consideration of the case is, unsurprisingly, driven by the fact that it might upend some of the charges leveled at Trump. And it is hard to criticize that focus because, well…Trump. He is the big dog, and if Fischer wins his appeal some of the cases against Trump either get complicated or even go away. [More]

Which helps explain some of the Marxist desperation

Let’s just hope we’re not talking Kraken here…

[Via Michael G]

Why, Indeed?

Why Raskin wants Justice Clarence Thomas to recuse himself from potential Trump ruling [More]

Because he’s the legacy forwarding heir of a treasonous communist, of course…

Not that the statist apologists at USA Today (a Gannett Publication) will tell you that.

[Via Jess]

You Say You Want a Revolution?

Maine’s top election official rules Trump ineligible for 2024 primary ballot [More]

Does this stupid, evil bitch think her kind can rule without consent of the governed?

Does she not realize there will be consequences, whichever “side wins,” and recall what happened to the Mensheviks if it’s “hers”?

Anybody still believe “commonsense gun safety laws” are the reason Democrats demand disarming the militia of the whole people?

I expect the Supreme Court to put an end to this nonsense, although, as with Bruen, “blue states” won’t give up on testing that.

I also expect such a ruling will be used against them if the Republicans manage to blow ’24.

ForbiddenTestimony

Jack Smith Wants Judge to Exclude Trump’s January 6 Evidence From Trump’s January 6 Trial [More]

Reminds me of the Wayne Fincher trial, where the judge wouldn’t let him argue the Constitution and Second Amendment…

Cut through all the crap and what we have here is administration loyalists prosecuting Joe Biden’s political opponent on the premise that HE’s the one interfering with elections.

[Via Michael G]

Of Course You Realize This Means War

BREAKING: California Lt. Gov tells SecState to “explore every legal option” to get Trump off primary ballot [More]

Expect more like this.

I can’t tell if they’re stupid enough to provoke millions of armed Americans or if they know such moves don’t stand a chance (yet) and they’re just flipping us off because they hate us.

Could be a mix of both.

It’s OK to hate ’em back.

[Via Michael G]

UPDATE

Or just evil

Do as I Say, Not as I Do

U.S. Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., was a key player behind ex-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s snap impeachment of President Donald Trump… Now Raskin is insisting that Joe Biden be considered exempt from even being investigated for impeachment… [More]

That second-generation communist subversive again

I don’t suppose this could be a “Please don’t throw me in the briar patch” move? Maneuver the Republicans into achieving a Pyrrhic victory and doing the heavy lifting for the young radicals in the Democrat party to advance their power …?

Bombshell or Bangsnap?

Jim Jordan Claims Fulton County DA Fani Willis Colluded With J6 Committee to Indict Trump [More]

Forget “the revelation could have profound implications on the perception of the legitimacy of the efforts to prosecute Trump.” We all know it’s a poltical kangaroo court.

What are they going to DO to her for refusal to comply?

Or are we talking flaccid Krakens again?

[Via Michael G]

Well, If He Wasn’t Doing Anything WRONG…

The Obama administration, just 17 days before the inauguration of President Donald Trump, revised the guidelines of Section 2.3 of Executive Order 12333, “Procedures for the Availability or Dissemination of Raw Signals Intelligence Information by the National Security Agency.” [More]

I’m more concerned about the people in his administration with Swamp loyalties knew about it and didn’t inform him.

[Via bondmen]

Judicial System Reeks with Democrat Political Bias Against Guns and More

They’re not only conflicted but hiding it. You don’t get more in-your-face corrupt than that. But don’t look for the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board to care. [More]

What good is having your day in court when the judge is in bed with the offending politicians?

The Old Goy Network

Christie says Trump’s ‘intolerant language and conduct’ contribute to rise in antisemitism [More]

That sounds like something “a closet antisemite” would say…

It’s not Trump agenda supporters out to make them — and everyone else — more vulnerable. And he doesn’t think “dangerous… crazy [and] radical” sounds intolerant?

Boy, the DSM sure is playing it up with everything they’ve got, though…

[Via Steve T]

Kingmaker?

Could evangelical leader’s endorsement upend Trump’s massive lead before Iowa’s caucus? [More]

Well, let’s see

“Vander Plaats ran unsuccessfully for Governor of Iowa in 2002, 2006, and 2010. He was the party’s nominee for lieutenant governor in 2006, losing to Democrat Patty Judge.”

And his organization doesn’t think the right to keep and bear arms and immigration are important enough to feature as “Policy Issues.”

How they believe leaving core constituents out will help advance the issues they do care about is left unsaid. Which suits the Democrats just fine.

Looks like Faux News and the Vichycons are doing their best to listen to losers and keep the Stupid Party stupid.

Why?

Where Credit is Due

The Supreme Court Should Not Let Bureaucrats Invent Crimes by Rewriting the Law – The Trump administration’s unilateral ban on bump stocks turned owners of those rifle accessories into felons. [More]

Let’s not forget the role Wayne LaPierre and Chris Cox played in paving the way (and good luck finding their joint statement on the NRA website anymore).

Pointing all that out and more seems to make some people uncomfortable. One angry reader canceled his subscription over it.

You know the type.

[Via Michael G]

Verified by MonsterInsights