Tag: Hunter Biden

New Development in Biden Gun Case May Open Complaint for Reconsideration

At the time of the ruling, attorney Stephen Stamboulieh advised that no appeal would be filed due to time, expense, and the unlikelihood of it succeeding. This could change that. A motion for reconsideration may now be feasible since Biden’s attorney Clark publicly acknowledged the investigation. [More]

With his lawyer publicly acknowledging an investigation, ATF’s “Hunter Biden privacy” claim at this point is demonstrably BS.

I Have Some Good News and Some Bad News

Defendant’s motion hinges on the constitutionality of § 922(n) because if the provision is unconstitutional, then Defendant’s false statement during the purchase of the firearm is immaterial. [More]

So if that stands, will it moot any Hunter Biden complaint for lying on the 4473?

[Via Robert J]

Related UPDATE

People under felony indictment can’t be barred from purchasing guns, judge rules [More]

I gotta wonder if the judge is trying to force an outraged demand for legislative action here and if all the high-fiving about how significant this is may turn out to be premature. He was nominated by Trump but also nominated for an earlier position by Obama.

[Via Remarks]

Another Write-up

Judge shuts down gun rights activist’s attempt to shed light on Hunter Biden’s alleged gun crimes [More]

Unlike most of the other reports, I appreciate the links and the recognition in this one. There’s still nothing about it, of course, in the “Lies of Omission” major media.

Not to tease, but there’s still a chance this might not be over that I can’t give details on yet.

Republicans haven’t had much luck, either, but my suspicion is their move was more pre-midterms motivated. You’ll forgive me if I don’t have a lot of confidence in a GOP-controlled House Oversight Committee doing much more than making self-serving noise.

Still, it tells us all we need to know about the Democrats.

At Least They Spelled My Name Right*

U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras, a President Barack Obama appointee, ruled Tuesday against plaintiff David Codrea’s request to have federal records regarding Hunter Biden’s 2018 gun purchase released. [More]

Seeing as how I broke this development, was the first to point out the 4473 implications, and the only one to notice the laptop video involved a second gun, would it have killed you guys to give me a link?

In any case, the majors aren’t touching this. Neither are the grabbers.

[Via Keith B]

* With the exception of the case cite…

UPDATE

The Google alert…

Most of the entries are copied off the Politico piece.

Aside from most avoiding a link to the original report, the other thing they have in common is none of them are big outfits, which would just as soon nobody talk about this.

The NICS Self-Incrimination Form

Thus, pursuant to 34 U.S.C. § 40901(e)(1)(D), we hereby notify you, and thereby make you “aware” that the “basis” on which signers of the NICS Indices Self-Submission Form have been reported to NICS “does not apply.” Thus, pursuant to you your duties under the statute, we respectfully request that the FBI: (i) identify and “remove” records from its “database” relating to those who have signed the FBI form; (ii) that the FBI (under the authority of the Attorney General) “remove” the offending records from the NICS system;4 and (iii) that the FBI halt its use of the illegal and unconstitutional NICS Indices Self-Submission Form. [More]

Funny, how the form doesn’t include a Miranda warning that anything they sign can and will be used against them in a court of law and that they have a right to an attorney. The workaround appears to be that the signers haven’t been convicted or “adjudicated” of anything (yet).

You’d think the FixNICSers would be focused on industry customers being tyrannized and coerced instead of cheerleading registration-enabling prior restraints imposed by their “partners.”

Any bets on getting the requested reply in 30 days, or do Christopher Wray et al. figure as long as Democrats control things there’s no danger of personal repercussions, they have an inexhaustible legal war chest at their disposal, and if the Republicans do manage not to blow it, the “leadership” won’t pursue things thoroughly enough to actually punish anyone?

Or will they get right on it as soon as the frog march Hunter Biden for lying twice?

Sensitive, Aren’t We?

Oh, so that’s the reason.

I appealed the warning and gave as my reason:

This tweet documents photographic evidence that Hunter Biden has committed a second firearms-related felony that no one else in the media is covering.

That and I could find a million photos on Twitter that show more skin.

I’ll letcha know what they say.

UPDATE

I just noticed someone sent me a Facebook message yesterday:

Thanks for posting the Ammoland.com article on your fB Page on June 8 & 9th. I was curious if you received any notice from fB about it because I attempted to share it on my page and immediately noticed that it goes “against Community Guidelines” Really?!?!

As a result of sharing it, my #2A businesses have been issued a 28-day ban on Facebook.

I thought it was a well-documented and written article with citations, proof, and a reasonable argument.

Because there is no “Fact-Check” or notice on the post, it must be ok with it. However, just now, in writing this message, I tried to save the article here on fB, which issued two additional warnings that it was contraband.

Again though wanted to thank you for writing the article and the interesting observation and argument presented. I am curious if you have seen any additional follow-up or responses about your presentation. Somebody doesn’t want folks to ask the question.

That, of course, was the same Hunter Biden article, and no, FB never contacted me or took any kind of ban action against me.  This and this are both still up with no warnings to me. I guess if they don’t let you know it makes exposing their censorship practices less likely.

Remember the first time they said I violated their “community standards”?

People lots bigger than me don’t want anyone to notice this. Unfortunately, I can’t create a Streisand Effect by myself.

In the Interests of Transparency

Cover-Up: Biden Treasury Makes Move to Stop GOP From Getting Hunter Biden Records [More]

Criminal conspiracy stonewalling and cover-up from the highest circles… where have we seen that before?

Funny, how we have to learn about this from Red State and the New York Post, while all the majors only seem to be concerned with Mar-a-Lago records…

The Embarrassment-in-Chief

The president isn’t featured in ads. He goes largely unnamed on campaign websites and Twitter accounts. And candidates in key races in battleground states are either not asking him to come — or avoiding him when he does. [More]

The power players, through their media mouthpieces, are signaling loud and clear that he had better step aside for 2024. If “friendly” persuasion doesn’t work, they’ll drop some not-so-subtle extortion reminders about legal vulnerabilities, starting with Hunter.

[Via Jess]

Shall Not Be Infringed EXCEPT…

The Biden Administration Defends the Federal Ban on Gun Possession by Medical Marijuana Users [More]

What about crack smokers?

So when will Nikki Fried be prosecuted?

And, since they cite the historical precedents, when will the confiscation raids to disarm Indians and Catholics begin? They do realize both groups mostly vote Democrat?

[Via Jess]

Just a Little Something to Take Our Minds Off Hunter Biden

Former Governor of Puerto Rico Arrested in Bribery Scheme [More]

And here’s the comedy gold:

“The Department of Justice is committed to holding accountable those who wrongly believe there is one rule of law for the powerful and another for the powerless. No one is above the rule of law.”

Is it really so wrong to wonder if she made the administration’s enemies list?

[Via bondmen]

Nothing to See Here

Agents investigating President Joe Biden’s son “opened an assessment which was used by an FBI headquarters team to improperly discredit negative Hunter Biden information as disinformation and caused investigative activity to cease”… [More]

So basically, “gun control” is about surrendering ours to people who systemically misdirect and lie to us in order to maintain and grow their political power, and it has nothing to do with safety or “common sense,” and anyone who is willfully deluded and believes otherwise is exactly the type of useful idiot they’re counting on?

[Via Michael G]

Fishing Expedition

VIDEO: ATF conducts surprise firearm inspection at man’s home without search warrant [More]

Never talk to the police. All that friendly and reasonable posturing is just that.

At most, he could have said something like “Give me your card and I will have my lawyer call you.”

Although I do admit, if I had ATF and Delaware State Police together in one handy, recordable location, I’d have been willing to extend the conversation to questions about Hunter Biden’s gun.

[Via several of you]

It’s a Big Club and You Know How the Rest of It Goes

Hunter Biden was longtime friends with a well-connected lawyer and lobbyist with deep roots in DC Republican politics — who praised him as a “rock star” and “beacon of hope.” [More]

He “served on former President Trump’s 2016 transition team”?

This swamp thing?

Proud of his working relationship with Norman Mineta, is he…?

[Via Michael G]

Do the Math

“There are 5 guns in dads house. There are f***ing more weapons in your sons room then in an armory.” [More]

Joe says there are only two.

That’s a heck of a discrepancy. What happened to the other three and to the “armory”? Were they “safely stored”? Who has them now? Were they “lawfully” transferred?

I mean, as long as he demands we account for our guns to the government…

The Sounds of Silence

From every one of the networks and major newspapers a la New York Times/Washington Post on the Hunter Biden naked gun story… [More]

That said, even the “conservative” sites are all focused on the sensational “naked with a whore while armed and high” aspect, and so far, mine is the only report I’ve seen highlighting the evidence of a second gun/second felony.

I don’t get why more aren’t picking that up. This seems like a gift that we could be exploiting by loudly shoving it in the Democrats faces at a time when they’re trying to eviscerate 2A.

NIH, “gun groups”?

Verified by MonsterInsights