Notes from the Resistance
What is clear is someone with motives of their own, knowing full well that their complaining to police could result in this man’s loss of freedom (or worse) took advantage of the disarmed snitch culture encouraged by authorities in order to destroy his life. [More]
Their own government gives new meaning to the phrase “Close your eyes and think of England.”
Liberals rage as ABC pulls Jimmy Kimmel off air following Charlie Kirk assassin comments [More]
I like all the outraged lunatics on Kimmel’s BlueSky page losing their minds and threatening to boycott ABC/Disney, which is a wonderful outcome when you consider how woke they became trying to pander to the left.
So… when will The View get what’s coming to them?
—
Related UPDATE
Roseanne Barr’s Epic Response to Kimmel’s Suspension Is Comedy Gold
[Via Michael G]
Retired British Army Colonel Richard Kemp has said the primary risk the UK faces is from an alliance “of the hard left and Islamist extremists” and that he fears civil war because politicians are too myopic to take action. [More]
So… have they arrested him yet?
And more to the point, what makes us feel so superior?
[Via Michael G]
Claremont McKenna’s Muslim Student Association had criticized the college’s choice of Rushdie in a May 2 statement, calling it “disrespectful” and out of line with the college’s commitment to inclusion. [More]
And nothing says inclusion like issuing ideological fatwas.
So much for “an open and welcoming space for everyone“…
Ah well, “misdirecting” on that is supported by history, text, and tradition… and I’m sure the word “rigorous” appplies to all those friendly faces.
[Via Michael G]
NewsGuard announced last week it’s using AI to automatically prevent American citizens from seeing information online that challenges government and corporate media claims about elections ahead of the 2024 voting season. [More]
Who are you to question God?
[Via Michael G]
I’m trying to figure out if it’s my cookies and browser history causing this or the subject matter of the videos I’m trying to access, but more and more every time I try to watch a gun influencer on YouTube, Mark Barden’s showing up first. Is this happening to any of you?
As with Manuel Oliver, as sympathetic as we may feel, his “solution” is antithetical to freedom and unacceptable, and his loss does not give him a claim against our rights.
Starting off the video with these ads undermines the presenter’s work, especially with people who may not be informed and may be otherwise receptive. So I have some questions, because I don’t know how YouTube ad policies work.
Is it intentional placement? Does the client request it? Does the YouTube account where the ad is being placed have any say? If so, do they allow it because monetization is monetization? If not, could they reject it?
Conversely, would a “gun rights” group be able to have their ads placed at the start of gungrab group videos? Has anbody ever seen that happen?
And is this a directed policy by Google/YouTube to deliberately muddle messages they want to suppress, and inject their own?
[Video link submitted via Jess]
Guy gives new meaning to “Reading Rainbow”…
I guess if you smear them as book-burning Nazis, violence against women is woke.
Funny, the reading that is withheld from children.
[Via WiscoDave]
By sv1ambo – 1969 Dodge Charger – General Lee, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=38826333
‘The Dukes of Hazzard’ stars reunite, talk possible reboot of hit ’80s TV series [More]
Will they have to melt their car down…?
And just like last time, there’s no clue as to what the “violation” was, so there’s no way to avoid a recurrence. Which appears to be the plan, since doing whatever it is again can result in being booted…
I’m all ears for a better way to promote my articles than advocacy media. Because the shrinkage continues, and this and this have never produced noticeable results.
Even “intentionally misleading” speech is protected by the First Amendment, and a government that respects freedom of speech has no business deciding how to apply that slippery label. [More]
No matter how badly Democrats want them to.
[Via Jess]
“See, we have a First Amendment right to figure out how to suppress others’ speech. We’re the real victims here.” [More]
Anybody still need the acronym explained…?
[Via Michael G]
Leftist Mayor Calls 911 On Peaceful Petitioners – Describes Them As “Far Right Wing” [More]
That’s literally the First Amendment this she-Nazi tried to deploy the SS against.
When I saw this last week my first thought was to do a FOIA and make her go on record– under penalty of perjury — to provide records of all the “complaints” she says she received.
Looking at Washington’s Public Records law, it looks like they need to be inspected in person, which is a showstopper for me– but not for anyone there interested in picking up the ball and running with it.
[Via bondmen]
JFK Is Easy, Now Do TWA Flight 800 [More]
I neglected to add that one, didn’t I?
No wonder he’s being canceled in the name of “diversity.”
If you didn’t hear it from the DSM, it’s just not news.
[Via bondmen]
As it turns out, the Biden White House relied on foreign “disinfo” activists to pressure Facebook to censor Americans. Worse, it turns out the group supposedly targeting disinformation had their facts wrong. Facebook knew it, too. [More]
Those must be the “community standards” they keep dinging me for violating…
[Via Michael G]
FIREARM MARKETING BANS REALLY ABOUT ERASING NEXT GENERATION’S GUN RIGHTS [More]
Yeah, that’s a goal, but I’d say it’s really about banning speech to facilitate thought control.
It’s about tyranny.
That’s what NSSF doesn’t get when it thinks it can partner with monsters that won’t ultimately turn on them.
[Via JR]
