Notes from the Resistance
In an opinion piece for Scientific American, writer Bryn Nelson insinuated that my factual reporting on Drag Queen Story Hour was an example of “stochastic terrorism,” which he defines as “ideologically driven hate speech” that increases the likelihood of unpredictable acts of violence. [More]
Such smears by agents of those who crave power and control seem to be all the rage these days.
Figures Scientific American is carrying their water.
[Via Michael G]
Big Tech argues they deserve exemptions because they are not content providers. Acting as content deniers, suppressing anything that does not advance a state-approved “progressive” narrative, and facilitating the universal spread of that which does, effectively amounts to the same thing. [More]
How is removing legal content at the demand of Democrat politicians not a de facto First Amendment violation?
He is presuming to apply terror rules against U.S. citizens on U.S. soil for, in the case of gun owner advocates, exercising our First Amendment-recognized right to defend and promote our Second Amendment-recognized right. [More]
If “progressive” spooks have their way, “conservatives” being “canceled” will take on a whole new meaning.
FBI Agent Who Pushed To Censor Hunter Biden Story Is Shaping Biden Admin’s Response To ‘Misinformation’ [More]
Who better to feed out the official line than an official with a line?
[Via Michael G]
Greenwald: Meet The Consortium Imposing The Growing Censorship Regime [More]
I see their useful idiots are already hard at work.
[Via bondmen]
Never before have we been able to observe the application and effects of these powerful technologies in real-time on such a massive scale. [More]
I believe this is one reason why we who have been fighting the lies about the right to keep and bear arms for years, and who have seen the denial of reality and insistent substitution of lies coming from what we’ve been conditioned to accept as “authority figures” are better prepared than most to recognize when it’s being done in other areas.
And an age-old question comes to mind.
[Via bondmen]
Stop being shocked when mainstream liberals express their desire to see their political adversaries not only censored by a union of state and corporate power but also imprisoned. The crux of American liberalism is authoritarianism. [More]
Actually, the more impulsive ones just come out and admit they want you dead.
[Via Michael G]
They don’t want you to have guns and they don’t want you to have free speech. Hey, if you can get away with ignoring the Second Amendment, why should you respect the First? [More]
What’s more, a globalist collectivist tyrant from New Zealand is joined on her pathway to tyranny by what our media pass off as a “conservative.”
Received from Twitter:
Too late. The damage is done. Nobody goes back to look at old tweets from minor players.
Oh, so that’s the reason.
I appealed the warning and gave as my reason:
This tweet documents photographic evidence that Hunter Biden has committed a second firearms-related felony that no one else in the media is covering.
That and I could find a million photos on Twitter that show more skin.
I’ll letcha know what they say.
UPDATE
I just noticed someone sent me a Facebook message yesterday:
Thanks for posting the Ammoland.com article on your fB Page on June 8 & 9th. I was curious if you received any notice from fB about it because I attempted to share it on my page and immediately noticed that it goes “against Community Guidelines” Really?!?!
As a result of sharing it, my #2A businesses have been issued a 28-day ban on Facebook.
I thought it was a well-documented and written article with citations, proof, and a reasonable argument.
Because there is no “Fact-Check” or notice on the post, it must be ok with it. However, just now, in writing this message, I tried to save the article here on fB, which issued two additional warnings that it was contraband.
Again though wanted to thank you for writing the article and the interesting observation and argument presented. I am curious if you have seen any additional follow-up or responses about your presentation. Somebody doesn’t want folks to ask the question.
That, of course, was the same Hunter Biden article, and no, FB never contacted me or took any kind of ban action against me. This and this are both still up with no warnings to me. I guess if they don’t let you know it makes exposing their censorship practices less likely.
Remember the first time they said I violated their “community standards”?
People lots bigger than me don’t want anyone to notice this. Unfortunately, I can’t create a Streisand Effect by myself.
Watchdog Says Apple Must Follow Google’s Lead and Take Down Truth Social Because of Repeated Policy Violations [More]
As if to complement my latest AmmoLand piece, I just got this email from the book-burning hive insects at Media Matters, who not only want to exterminate their ideological opponents but snuff out any thought that doesn’t advance their subversion and control.
Does anyone see Google “moderating threats of violence” when they come from a regime that’s implementing radical social changes being pushed by the global elites? Does everyone see the way cultural conquerors are doing the censorship job that the government cannot get away with (yet)? And is no one concerned that these alien-minded punishers of “wrong thinking” and gatekeepers of “right thinking” feel confident enough to publicly drop the mask and distance themselves from the “Don’t be evil” pledge they initially found helpful in gaining public trust (and political concessions on “content providing,” with content denial conveniently left unaddressed)? [More]
What’s the opposite of “Don’t be evil”?
See the way cultural conquerors do the censorship job government cannot (yet)?
DHS Signals So-Called ‘Disinformation’ Work ‘Can and Must’ Continue [More]
That way, supportive “private” actors can do the government’s censorship dirty work for it without triggering First Amendment alarms.
Say no more, know what I mean? Nudge, nudge!
[Via Michael G]
So, WEF author Inbal Goldberger came up with a solution: she proposes to collect off-platform intelligence from “millions of sources” to spy on people and new ideas, and then merge this information together for “content removal decisions” sent down to “Internet platforms”. [More]
Think how easy life will be when we have machines to do our thinking for us! As I recall, that’s pretty close to what Morticia Addams said about Whizzo.
I don’t suppose it occurs to Inbal that she’s a monster? Or does it?
[Via bondmen]
They tell me that “your content has violated our Misleading Content policy. Please visit our Community Guidelines page blah, blah, blah”. Whatever. [More]
I confess I know next to nothing about this blog– I saw a post about censorship over at WRSA and that caught my interest seeing as how that’s exactly the reason I had to go through all the hassle of abandoning my Blogspot home of 17 years and starting this continuation blog. I see he, too, is the victim of a new Google censorship focus, which means no matter what he does, there are no assurances that work he spends portions of his life on won’t be summarily removed with no warning and no recourse.
Fortunately, that most invaluable of resources, the Internet Archive/ Wayback Machine* had his back on this one. I don’t see what the problem was with it, but then again, I saw no problem with what I posted either.
* I’ve been throwing some money their way once a year because I do find them so indispensable. Case in point: All my Examiner “Gunwalker” stuff would be gone from the net if not for them. And doesn’t that tell you just about everything you need to know about the DSM…
