Category: citizen disarmament

If It Ain’t Broke, Fix It

Not Good! Anti-2A Group Targeting Constitutional Carry [Watch]

The state that imposed Bernie Sanders on the rest of the Republic? The grabbers will no doubt tout disarming the sheep as a great victory for “gun sense.”

I’m sure the folks responsible for this will fall right into line.

[Via Jess]

Stop Me If You’ve Heard This One Before

Firearm enthusiasts in Oregon are flocking to gun stores as they wait to find out whether a federal judge will delay the start of a strict permit-to-purchase law before Thursday’s deadline. “The parking lot has been a disaster,” Northwest Armory owner Karl Durkheimer told Fox News. “The side streets around our place have been a disaster.” [More]

I wonder how many didn’t lift a finger and let groups like Oregon Firearms Federation carry all the load without helping.

I wonder how many are Democrats.

Related UPDATES

The Whys and the Wherefores

Legislators file bipartisan bills to allow nonviolent convicted felons to regain right to own guns [More]

They never lost the right, just its recognition by those who presume to be in charge. And this seems totally consistent with Bruen.

Still, forgive me if I suspect a Democrat’s motives are more in line with “absolving” crookedl constituents than a regard for universal freedom…

As for the violent ones…

[Via Jess]

Forget It, Jake. It’s Illinois.

Illinois Dems Introduce Gun Control Bill Targeting Assault Weapons, Age Restrictions [More]

My bet is it passes and then we’re in for years of challenges based on the Bruen standard. Then all the Republicans need to do is blow everything so the Democrats can restack SCOTUS and go for a reversal.

Any takers?

[Via Jess]

What’s My Line?

Where do Americans draw lines when it comes to guns and teens? [More]

There is no “one size fits all.” I’ve always used the term “development appropriate” instead of “age appropriate.”

Despite wretched Vichycons sucking up to Democrats to impose infringements that have no historical basis.

Copper Jacket TV reports the delay on 18-20-year-olds has begun. [Watch]

[Via Jess]

Our Bad…

Investigators said they “did not uncover any evidence that the timing of the (data breach) was driven by a nefarious intent or was personally or politically motivated in any way.” [More]

As we’ve seen in a prior cover-up, there’s a huge difference between “no evidence” and “exonerated.”

In any case, say it really was systemic retard-level incompetence and negligence– in any rational organization, that would result in top-level firings followed by legal actions.

[Via Sweet Babboo]

Murphy Floats Defunding Police Who Won’t Violate Second Amendment

What Murphy is doing is extorting law enforcement that refuses to waste resources enforcing edicts that clearly violate the Supreme Court’s Bruen ruling, like the Oregon sheriffs who have gone on record as refusing to go after Measure 114 magazine ban defiers. And not just them, but also on non-Democrat-dominated political jurisdictions, as exemplified by the growing number of “Second Amendment sanctuary” cities and counties (what lying, race-baiting Democrats smear as “Civil War Flashpoints”). Add to that states that not only won’t enforce infringements, but that have enacted their own laws to override them, and are fighting in court to have them upheld, like Texas suing ATF “for unlawfully prohibiting firearm silencers.” [More]

If only the Founders had foreseen the potential for centralized tyranny and established a federalist system with delegated and reserved divisions of power… oh, wait…

Authorized Infringers?

Jordan says the ghost gun rule “goes well beyond the authority granted to the agency in any applicable federal statutes,” and expands the legal definition of a firearm beyond what Congress intended. A prior letter from Jordan to ATF declared the rule “appears to be a deliberate attempt to usurp the authority of Congress,” and said it unconstitutionally infringes “on American citizens’ fundamental Second Amendment rights and privacy rights under the Fourth Amendment.” [More]

He’s right about the agency lacking authority. What I’ve yet to see is where Congress can legitimately claim it.

And I don’t see too many on “our side” talking about that.

[Via Jess]

‘What is It You Want Us to Do?’

The anti-humanist future and the transhumanist future are opposites in most ways. But both are worlds from which human beings have disappeared, and rightfully so. [More]

The Atlantic said it, I believe it, that settles it!

And what better way to start the process than by convincing the least intellectually fit among us that “commonsense gun safety laws” and a centrally-controlled “monopoly of violence” are for their own benefit?

You notice the purveyors of such genocidal dreams never seem to off themselves to show the rest of us the way…?

Oh, and here’s the answer to the title question.

California Firearm Purchase Delay Evokes MLK ‘Justice Denied’ Quote

If the California DOJ won’t let Ed buy a gun, what’s to say they’ll let him keep the ones he already has if their misidentification persists? It’s not like they don’t know what he has and where he lives. That alone, along with the propensity of state disarmament enforcers to violently descend in the middle of the night, makes calling attention to his plight a matter of personal safety. [More]

Nothing says “shall not be infringed” like “How do we know you’re not a criminal?”