Six Reasons Why Tulsi Gabbard Is Donald Trump’s Best Choice as a Running Mate [More]
And more reasons not to.
A heartbeat from the presidency is no place to do that.
[Via bondmen]
Category: Election Integrity
Whose Country Is It, Anyway?
The House Rules Committee will consider a proposal late Monday afternoon that would prevent illegal aliens and other foreign nationals from skewing elections by shifting the apportionment of congressional seats and electoral college votes. [More]
How about we focus on not blowing November and then readdress this when it has a chance?
[Via bondmen]
Not Your Friend
Another Flaccid Kraken
Noncitizens do vote in U.S. elections — here’s how they do it – Illegal noncitizen voters were three times more likely to be Dems than GOP [More]
But then we read:
Neither side can say with certainty whether that’s common or rare…
Why the f*** not at this point?
The only answer is the presumption of “sides” is an illusion.
[Via bondmen]
Ye Shall Know the Truth…?
THE NRA ENDORSES ANTI-GUNNERS…AGAIN
Mannix has been promoting gun control for 25 years so his vote was to be expected. Charlie Conrad is new at this. His votes have been so egregious his own county party has demanded he resign. What in the world is NRA thinking? Well, they also endorsed Vikki Breese Iverson who was the Republican House Leader when they folded and handed a gun control victory to the Democrats with HB 2005. [More]
It’s what they do. The links I could provide…
Also get an update on the Vichycon gun group whose own words show them to be phonies.
The Dotard in Chief
Joe Biden announces that the 2A was ‘never absolute’ and all that talk about the tree of liberty is ‘crap’ [More]
Me, I’m hoping those swing state poll numbers hold.
In which case we’ll see about that.
WE may get a good preview of things to come at the Democrat Convention.
[Via bondmen]
The Long Hot Summer
Today’s Democrats
Some Good News and Some Bad News
Additionally, it barred illegal aliens and other foreign citizens from collecting voter registration forms, though that portion of the law was struck down in March by an Obama-appointee. [More]
The South Park succubus comes to mind.
[Via Michael G]
It’s My Party and I’ll Leave If I Want To
It was a party that fought for civil liberties and rights, remembering how neighbors and friends were thrown in Japanese internment camps during World War II, their freedoms taken away in an instant. It was a party inspired by JFK and the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., who showed us what is possible when we as Americans come together. [More]
It was the party that threw those citizens into the camps and led the filibuster against the Civil Rights Act.
I welcome the noises she’s making but I still don’t trust her.
That’s Debatable
Contorting, lol. And I never said, or even suggested, any of that. The 3% just objectively proves you were wrong about A+ meaning you always have to be right–it doesn’t imply anything about subjective weights of infringements. [More]
I’m moving the “debate” here because it’s bad form to hijack another man’s post with an argument, because it doesn’t limit me to 280 characters, and because I basically use “advocacy media” to promote my work, so as long as I’m doing it, why limit eyeballs?
The thread with the back-and-forths starts here. My response to this latest:
Not “wrong,” just not expecting you to argue a formal academic scale instead of one of principle. My assumption was you were saying helping Gonzales return to power only counted 3% against a grade of 100. I just didn’t realize what you were talking about because it struck me as so off-topic.
My mistake was accepting your distracting from the real issue with non sequiturs about 3% and age and four terms. It’s simple: Abbot is enabling a Quisling who sold us out to Biden’s tyranny and will predictably do so again. And you’re excusing him and doing so helps the establishment GOP exclude new and principled contenders, with no disincentives. So from my point of view, the one who “always has to be right” is the one evading that reality to instead try and score an irrelevant “gotcha.”
To me, real 2A fidelity means 100%, kind of like the reverse of you can’t be a little bit pregnant. Maybe it means something different to you.
And the “Bipartisan bill” did more than create new opportunities for ATF to destroy lives and kill your fellow gun owners on private sales. They’re extending the net for all it’s worth.
LOL, no. You are welcome to write what you want wherever you want, but I’m under no obligation to obey your unilateral dictates. Have fun with that, though.
With ‘Republicans’ Like These, Who Needs Clowns?
When we checked, the only candidate whose website listed this group as “endorsing” them was Goodwin. Two candidates we contacted had never heard of them and had not requested, and were unaware of, the endorsements. Hilariously, the website twice misquoted the Second Amendment as “the right to bear and keep arms.” [More]
But Democrats are the only ones laughing.
It Depends Upon What the Meaning of the Term ‘Goes Wrong’ Is
‘A lot would have to go wrong for Biden to lose’ [More]
That H. L. Mencken: Him plenty smart fella.
If any more goes wrong, who says there’ll be an election?
Saber Rattling with No Consequences
EXCLUSIVE: America First Policy Institute Demands Key Battleground States Enforce Ban On Non-Citizen Voting [More]
And if they don’t?
Parroting a press release ain’t exactly a scoop, guys…
The Anti-Kraken
But The New York Times reported in early April that covert Chinese accounts are masquerading as supporters of former President Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee. These accounts are also promoting conspiracy theories, stoking domestic divisions and attacking Biden ahead of the election in November. [More]
Just to be clear, when election fraud allegations point at Democrats, they’re “baseless.”
And since “Russian collusion” didn’t work, we’ll just change the meme to “Chinese.”
I Got Them Uniparty Blues
Bannon: House Republicans secretly want Trump to lose [More]
Remember what Prof. Quigley said:
“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy”
And guess who took that to heart.
