The prideful creation presuming itself to be the Creator seems to me to be how this whole mess started.
[Via Jess]
Notes from the Resistance
The prideful creation presuming itself to be the Creator seems to me to be how this whole mess started.
[Via Jess]
Garrett’s attorney, state Rep. Josh Williams (R-Sylvania Twp.), says prosecutors are leaning on an Ohio law that bans drivers and passengers from having loaded firearms within reach inside a vehicle. But he argues another section of the law creates an exemption for concealed carry license holders. Garrett holds a lifetime license in Indiana. [More]
And duty to inform IF ASKED seems ripe for a Fifth Amendment challenge.
Yet the Republicans who allow this and aren’t pushing for change will be quick to brag about how they’re “staunch defenders of the Second Amendment” come election time.
[Via Jess]
Just learned today of the sickening limits set by Contra Costa County (pop. 1.2m) for their CCW licensees. No Single Action only pistol allowed. Yes, implicates the 1911, 2011 etc. No Weapon lights allowed No Red Dots allowed No Lasers allowed No more than 2 weapons allowed [More]
If anyone has credible links to confirm the claims, please share them in comments.
[Via Jess]
Take the guns first, due process later?
And then trust people officially considered to dangerous to own a gun to walk unrestrained among the rest of us?
Speaking of lunatic, if “gun control” and designating “prohibited persons” work, explain Chicago.
Meanwhile, the Democrats, once they get back in power because Republicans keep doing and saying stupid $#!+ like this, are setting things in motion to declare being anti-trans a mental illness and create a self-admitted record of it. Tell me if they could get away with it they wouldn’t demand that to be a “Hate Crime Prohibitor.”
Gee, what do you know: Collectivism (and that’s what such a ban would be predicated on) is two-edged sword.
Rights belong to each of us as individuals. My position on this hasn’t changed.
As for Kirk, he’s a Vichycon fraud. One who knowingly sends Turning Point USA members into harm’s way without adequate precautions, which makes it fair to wonder if he thinks THEIR sacrifice will be worth it.
Where do we get these “conservative influencers” from?
And what kind of Opposite Day Bizarro World are we living in where CNN et al. are backhandedly arguing for the Second Amendment?
Related UPDATE
CCRKBA: DOJ SHOULDN’T BAN GUNS FOR TRANS PEOPLE OVER INDIVIDUAL CRIMES [More]
Yep. That it’s even being discussed by anyone in the administration once more makes my point for me.

These lands belong to the people, and the people have the right to keep and bear arms. [More]
As Commander-in-Chief, this would be an easy and very popular fix with gun owners. Republicans facing midterms and “gun rights” groups take note how this would benefit you and get behind this now.
Ohio officials are reminding educational, religious and nonprofit institutions across the state to consider a range of safety-related resources and funding opportunities. [More]
No, of course the one thing that will work isn’t included.
[Via JG]
[T]he 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has found that machine guns are not protected under the Second Amendment with really a terribly reasoned ruling. But the outcome is the one we want because, as I’ve explained to you before, unequivocally, 100% we 1,000% do not want a machine gun case to go to the United States Supreme Court. Anyone that disagrees with me is 1,000% wrong. If a machine gun case goes to the Supreme Court, we will 1,000% lose, which will create more bad Second Amendment precedent. And it will also delay, as an opportunity cost the decision that AR-15s and semi-automatic rifles are protected arms under the Second Amendment… [Watch]
The fact that his legal read on this is correct should be all the proof we need that the court benches are dominated by traitors.
[Via Jess]
Following its amicus brief in support of us, the federal government has asked the Seventh Circuit for approval to participate in oral arguments in our lawsuit challenging Illinois’ “assault weapon” and magazine bans [More]
How could they refuse? After all, “Currently, six of the court’s judges were appointed by Republicans and five by Democrats.”
Yeah, but one of those “Republicans” is treasonous dotard Frank Easterbrook…
[Via Jess]
Trey Gowdy’s Remarks on Gun Control: What He Said — and What He Didn’t [More]
We heard what he said, and we didn’t hear “shall not be infringed.
I don’t think it helps.

The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) has filed its opening brief with the Third Circuit in its case challenging the federal ban on gun ownership by medical marijuana users. [More]
I can’t wait to hear the Pam Bondi-authorized arguments against this.
Huge Win! GOA Secures True Constitutional Carry in Tennessee [More]
I can bear my arm of choice wherever I may go…?
Trump suggests ‘distinguished’ ex-military teachers could carry weapons at schools [More]
So… a new category of “Only Ones“…?
That’s not a FASTER requirement, and the program’s been working great.
It’s not a 2A requirement, either.
I gotta get this serial administration cheerleader some pom poms.
Related UPDATE
Fortunately, there’s a Constitutional alternative:
H.R. 5066: Safe Students Act – To repeal the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and amendments to that Act.
If at first you don’t succeed…
Unfortunately:
Prognosis 1% chance of being enacted
That and the guy floating unequal protection calls Massie “a third-rate Grandstander” (as opposed, I suppose, to a first-rate one?) and wants him out.
[Via Jess]

Walz to call special session on gun control, propose assault weapons ban [More]
What lies must he have told NRA to get its endorsement? Apparently he didn’t have to, since his “unwavering pro-gun support” was based on “sportsmen” and “rich hunting heritage.”
[Via Jess]

That Kinzinger is evidently unaware of this (or aware but deliberately lying by omission about it) is no surprise. [More]
Photo caption contest winner: How you can tell Adam Kinzinger is lying.
A Delaware state court struck down the state’s ban on firearms ownership for adults between the ages of 18 and 21, citing the obvious conclusion that such a ban is unconstitutional, just as it would be for any other enumerated right. However, the opinion is wrought with other areas of concern that show the court’s hostility towards Second Amendment rights. [More]
[Via Michael G]