We’re the Only Ones Harassed Enough

Portage County Sheriff’s Office addresses social media post, alleges harassment by felon [More]

And now, the rest of the story.

This is the “Only One” tasked with making sure you’re disarmed inside Fair buildings because you’re not as professional as him.

What a disgrace.

Not that “real reporter” Ashley Pompas and the team of crack official narrative amplifiers at 19 News are interested in both sides…

We’re the Only Ones Self-Defending Enough

Timessquaresensitivearea

A knife-wielding woman stabbed two people in the heart of Times Square Monday afternoon before advancing on NYPD officers with two knives and being shot by police… [More]

See, the two mere citizen victims had their choices to do that taken away from them by “law.”

Oath Breaker

As to the reasons for this rising extremism, he argued that “military institutions tend to become more conservative and isolated from civilian society” and that “these conservative tendencies are constantly reinforced, and young military members can be easy prey for the extreme right-wing groups that relate through similar conservative ideology. Unfortunately, the United States Criminal Code and the Uniform Code of Military Justice do not currently provide the tools to deal with this crisis, as they do not treat domestic extremism as a specific criminal offense,” he wrote, adding, “Codifying domestic extremism as a punitive article under the military code would provide a means for commanders to adequately address the rising tide of domestic extremism.” [More]

While everyone else is understandably focused on the outrage of this embedded enemy within greasing the skids for terrorists, I’d like to call at least some of the attention to another motive at work here. This Lt. Col. Michael Schrama character is a fine one to talk about extremism in the ranks.

The masters he serves are intent on purging Oath Keepers and ensuring all orders, no matter how unlawful will be obeyed.

Meanwhile, the left has hijacked the concept to call for disobedience of lawful ones.

Not-So-Secret Weapon

While searching for something else today I ran across this 2015 post from the old blog, that in turn linked to an admission from the political left that supports everything I’ve been warning about regarding immigration and the Second Amendment.

Brown-Nosers

Brown releases review on mass shooting, action plan; says it’s unlikely it could have been prevented [More]

Not without anybody able to shoot back it couldn’t have been…

Unfortunately, proximate cause, tort claims immunities for government schools, and sensitive places doctrine mean lawsuits for damages attributable to forced disarmament aren’t likely to go anywhere.

[Via Edmund M]

Time for More ‘Fair Shares’

Iryna Zarutska’s Family Sues City Of Charlotte Over Fatal Rail Stabbing, Claims Inadequate Security… According to the complaint, long before Zarutska boarded the train, the defendants “knew that violent crime had repeatedly occurred on and around the Blue Line and the Charlotte Transportation Center.” [More]

That’s OK– the productive sector can afford it. If this can get past the “no duty to protect” hurdle…

[Via bondmen]

The FuddVoters Candidate

El-Sayed Dodges Twice on if He Wants to Replace 2nd Amendment Before Saying He’s Okay With Hunting Rifles [More]

For hunting tyrants and domestic enemies…?

Besides, we already have “a right to healthcare.”

We just don’t have a right to force someone else to provide it for us– that’s called slavery.

[Via bondmen]

We’re the Only Ones Zoophilist Enough

The FBI previously refused to hire job applicants if they admitted to hiring sex workers or stealing from an employer — or engaging in acts of bestiality. Today, those acts, which are mostly illegal across the country, are no longer automatic deal breakers for applicants to the nation’s top law enforcement agency. [More]

Hey, when you might need to call on them some day to burn babies to death, you can’t be too picky.

Besides, now that the West is becoming vibrant, cultural accommodations must be made.

[Via Steve T]

We’re the Only Ones Unhelpful Enough

A 48-year-old man was killed and a Philadelphia Police officer has been pulled from street duty for not offering aid to the man who was killed… The officer involved has served for two years, according to police, but authorities have not released his name. [More]

“Served”? How?

“Pulled from street duty”? Not identified and fired, with termination details preventing him from getting a job with any other department?

If there’s no duty to protect or even to respond, what are they good for?

[Via Steve T]

We’re the Only Ones Busting Ass Enough

The post claims officers attempted to use a Taser on the donkey before one officer ultimately shot and killed him… Authorities have not released the identity of the officer who fired the fatal shot. Officials also have not provided details explaining what prompted officers to view HeeHaw as a threat or why deadly force was used. [More]

I can’t think of a single mitigating reason why this shouldn’t define these asses for the rest of their lives.

[Via WiscoDave]

A ‘Pro-Gun Democrat’

In a 2016 interview, Latin Grammy Award-winning artist and Democratic congressional candidate Bobby Pulido defended a fellow singer against criticism for a graphic music video that depicted acts of sexual violence and murder. In the video production of “Fuiste Mía” or “You were mine” by Gerardo Ortiz, a singer walks in on his girlfriend cheating on him. After shooting her lover, he then handcuffs her to a pole, blindfolds her, and gropes her before putting her in the trunk of his car and setting it on fire. [More]

Hey, what’s the big deal? He’s “one of us” isn’t he?

That must be why he embraces this guy:

If shooting guns were the only criteria, we’d have no better pal than Lon Horiuchi.

Based on who else they help attain political power, there ARE no “Pro-Second Amendment” Democrats.

Which makes me wonder what the hell NRA is doing endorsing one after she had come out for Joe Biden. Have they learned nothing with Kirsten Gillibrand? John Dingell? Hary Reid? Jon Tester? Bart Stupak…?

None Dare Call It Megalomania

Kathy Hochul defended her state’s ban on 3D-printed guns, saying, “I’m going to be the one who says no.” [More]

Note the way she equates all citizens determined to exercise rights she has no legitimate claim to with “someone in their kitchen who may have severe mental health problems who wants to shoot up kids in your school.”

It sounds like the severe mental problems are hers– especially if she believes she can stop those determined citizens.

Grant/Viramontes Brief of the Petitioners

Whether the Second and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee the right to possess AR-15 platform and similar semiautomatic rifles. [More]

You know the answer to that and I know the answer to that.

The question isn’t so much how many Supreme Court Justices know the answer to that as how many will not willingly subvert the Constitution and betray their countrymen?

At First Glance

At a glance, my father looks like the last guy who’d ever want a gun. He is Jewish, an immigrant, a politically liberal city dweller. He didn’t grow up around guns. Most of all, he believed America needed stricter gun control laws. In fact, on many occasions, my father had referred to gun owners as crazy. But I had spent the previous five years studying American gun culture, and I had seen first hand that my father’s position was not so unusual. [More]

Go ahead and make my points for me.

If your father had a clue, he’d be the first guy to want a gun.

With the newsraper of record backing off of confiscation demands and grudgingly mentioning (but not accepting) self-defense utility, I’m starting to sense a pattern here, like with our bud G. Anteus. The grabbers are betting on SCOTUS taking ARs off the table (for now) and are setting up the field for a legislative fallback agenda until such time as they can oust Republican majorities and get back on plan.

O Canada

The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation on Thursday defended an internal memo directing its reporters and editors to refrain from describing the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks as “terrorist attacks,” telling Fox News Digital the guidance reflected its longstanding practice of attributing terms it considers politically and emotionally loaded. [More]

The Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect, eh?