Tag: “assault weapons”

A Tale Told by an Idiot, Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing

This week, I will put the Assault Weapons Ban on the Senate floor. [More]

What, is this Democrats whoring for headlines week…?

Question: Say the GOP blows ’24 or the election is stolen again, SCOTUS gets stacked, and this power pervert’s nocturnal emission comes true. Then say just 3% of us, and pray that’s all it is, reply “No, your move”…

Flesh out your plan, Schumer, you loathsome traitor. What needs to happen then, in detail, what will resistance to your bullshit tyranny look like, and you’re sure your enforcers are up for the response your hatred of men who believe unbendingly in the right to keep and bear arms will set off?

We will not disarm.

[Via Jess]

Not Interested

Waiver of right of respondent Jay Robert Pritzker, et al. to respond filed. [More]

There’s some arrogance for ya. They figure they don’t have to answer for Illinois Supreme Court corruption. Let’s hope SCOTUS surprises them and decides to look into it.

I’m told there may be more action on this later in the week, and if so, will decide if I can address it here or if a longer article is needed.

[Via President Non_Fudd]

Just Here for the Ratio

The GOSAFE Act is an innovative bill that would regulate assault weapons & high-capacity magazines. Thank you @SenatorHeinrich, @SenAngusKing , @SenMarkKelly , and @SenatorBennet for championing it. Weapons of war don’t belong on our streets. Let’s get it done. [More]

Aside from some effete lump who reposts Taylor Swift tweets, it doesn’t sound like too many people are impressed…

As for Mark Kelly, he’s still got some questions to answer.

Ball’s in Their Court

US Supreme Court justice Amy Coney Barrett just ordered the defendants in National Association for Gun Rights v. Naperville to explain why the court should not enjoin Illinois’s “assault weapon” ban law. [Watch]

And again with the Barden/Sandy Hook ad intro…

[Via Jess]

Game On

ANTI-GUN SCHEME IN BIANCHI “ASSAULT WEAPON” BAN CASE? Mark Smith Four Boxes Diner addresses whether the US Court of Appeals for the Four Circuit in Playing Games in Bianchi “Assault Weapon” ban case. The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (VA, MD, NC) has been sitting on the Bianchi case since its December 6, 2022 oral argument. Mark Smith Four Boxes Diner offers a potential explanation for this insane delay. [More]

Our rights are their playthings…?

[Via Jess]

Judicial System Reeks with Democrat Political Bias Against Guns and More

They’re not only conflicted but hiding it. You don’t get more in-your-face corrupt than that. But don’t look for the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board to care. [More]

What good is having your day in court when the judge is in bed with the offending politicians?

The Old Goy Network

Christie says Trump’s ‘intolerant language and conduct’ contribute to rise in antisemitism [More]

That sounds like something “a closet antisemite” would say…

It’s not Trump agenda supporters out to make them — and everyone else — more vulnerable. And he doesn’t think “dangerous… crazy [and] radical” sounds intolerant?

Boy, the DSM sure is playing it up with everything they’ve got, though…

[Via Steve T]

Bob Rose by Any Other Name

I’m a proud card-carrying member of the NRA… [More]

He then proceeds to endorse the evisceration of the Second Amendment.

Association Bylaws, Article III, Sec. 11, “Involuntary Termination of Membership and Disciplinary Proceedings” states in part:

“Any individual or organization member may be suspended or expelled for good cause, including, but not limited to, any conduct which is contrary to, or in violation of the Bylaws of the Association.”

This public anti-gun advocacy is in direct conflict with Article II, Purposes and Objectives, section 1:

“To protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, especially with reference to the inalienable right of the individual American citizen guaranteed by such Constitution to acquire, possess, collect, exhibit, transport, carry, transfer ownership of, and enjoy the right to use arms, in order that the people may always be in a position to exercise their legitimate individual rights of self-preservation and defense of family, person, and property, as well as to serve effectively in the appropriate militia for the common defense of the Republic and the individual liberty of its citizens;”

Additionally, Article III, “Membership,” section 1., “Eligibility,” requires that the member “subscribes to the objectives and purposes of the Association.”

I say expel the subverting old Fudd.

But No One’s Talking About Taking Your Guns

More to the point, what is the mental state of some ignorant Marxist hoplophobe who doesn’t understand the Second Amendment and thinks Americans who do will allow themselves to be disarmed?

Bullet Points

Army Ammunition Plant Is Tied to Mass Shootings Across the U.S. [More]

Tied by whom, Ben Dooley of The New York Times, the “D” part of the DSM? What was the purpose of writing this article?

I wonder if you compared all ammo sold by Lake City to the civilian market to the number of those rounds used in acts of violence what the abuse rate would be, and how many “0s” would follow the “.” to come up with a percentage…

[Via Dan Gifford]

Point/Counterpoint

As predicted by the Four Boxes Diner, in a 2-1 decision the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit— via a opinion by judges Wood and Easterbrook— have upheld Illinois’s “assault weapon” ban. However there is a strong dissent here. This decision is no shock to Four Boxes Diner viewers because as I explained before, in my view, Judge Wood and Judge Easterbrook are unserious jurists on 2A issues and this was a given outcome (unfortunate and frustrating, yes, but entirely predictable). [More]

Meanwhile, over in Fantasy Land…

Semantic Gymnastics?

ATF Director Calls for Universal Background Checks, Assault Weapons Ban at Harvard IOP Forum [More]

Then there’s this:

And then we scan them, right? But as far as I know, we are the only customer of Adobe Acrobat that actually pays extra money to have search capability taken out of that software.

I see some influencers treating this like a newly admitted database violation “Gotcha.” I must not be grokking something because this has been out there for years:

How can a database be “non-searchable”? Trick question: The system can’t really be considered a database. (There is a reason the ATF uses the phrase “data systems” instead). There is no ability to search the text of a file, and no effort is made to tag files with identifiers that could later be used to sort and search. “We compare it to an electronic card catalog system, where records are digitally imaged, but not optimized for character recognition,” ATF spokesman Corey Ray says.

Am I completely missing a point?

[Via William T]

A ‘Pro-Gun’ Democrat

Golden: I have opposed efforts to ban deadly weapons of war like the assault rifle he used to carry out this crime. The time has now come for me to take responsibility for this failure. Which is why I now call on the United States congress to ban assault rifles [Watch]

I wonder who he b**w over at NSSF:

[Via Jess]

Delay of Game

California’s assault weapons ban will remain in effect while a court considers whether the 30-year-old law is unconstitutional. [More]

That a court thinks there’s anything to consider is our first clue that the game is rigged.

I think we all know that the Ninth Circuit is going to side with citizen disarmament and it’ll take SCOTUS strapping ’em on to get a proper ruling–provided the Republicans don’t blow ’24 and the composition of the High Court changes while the clock is running.

Not that that would settle it…

[Via Jess]

Plus They’re as Heavy as 10 Boxes!

I prefer to use a .50 and cook mine from the inside.

The stupid, ignorant, and belligerent are leading the stupid, ignorant, and belligerent.

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights