Notes from the Resistance
I have three articles this time out:
Pick up a copy at a diverse and inclusive newsstand near you.
Cardinal Mooney posted an information sheet on Facebook detailing prohibited behaviors and items. Among them are “Weapons of any kind, including off-duty law enforcement, weapons, pipes, knives or chains.” [More]
It’s not so much a matter of sticking up for “Only Ones” exclusivity as one of not allowing local entities to undermine preemption and overrule state law.
AmmoLand Needs You in the Fight for Freedom [More]
I’m reiterating my “Appeal to Heaven.”
If you get value, why wouldn’t you give some in return?
What, you’ll just go to “another” gun site? Then you’ll miss out on exclusives nobody else has.
See, I only ever ask readers one thing for me, and it’s never money. My clients and friends on the other hand…
I just got my copy of the November/December 2025 issue in the mail, featuring my Gun Rights article, “Is the Second Amendment an Obsolete Relic of Another Time?” on pg. 73.
This is my fourth (and looks like final) column for this magazine since they announced they are discontinuing print editions. As for going forward with a digital publication, so far no one has approached me and I figure right now they’re all scrambling to adjust, adapt, and see what continuation will look like.
You might want to see if you can pick up a copy at your local news stand because the last issue of a magazine that has been published for over half a century might be a collector’s item some day.
Why were those 10 citizens chosen? What do they have that “we” don’t? Or more to the point, what do we also have that they do? [More]
Why, when there’s an easy way, does the “pro-gun” DOJ so often choose the hard way?
“Alberta’s government is exploring various options with provincial, territorial, and federal counterparts and external stakeholders to protect law-abiding firearms owners from federal overreach.” [More]
There’s still a long way to go, but it should not go unnoticed that some Canadian officials sound a lot better than Blue State Democrats.
Why Haven’t Membership Gun Groups Asked Him? [More]
Seems a fair enough question. It would be a win for us and a win for him.
This is something President Trump could fix today… [More]
It’s way past time to undo an attack made by the Obama administration.
Left Wingers in Congress Equate Marksmanship Training with Gang Banging [More]
Just like the scorpion in the fable that couldn’t stop killing, they can’t stop lying. It’s in their nature.
(And yes, I know I said I’d not be posting here ’til Monday, but my articles need to be publicized as soon as I can do it.)
If they did it at work and if tax dollars are involved, we who pay into the system have a rightful interest. [More]
Whose time and/or equipment are they using?
Fusaro has offered a detailed plan, and good one. It’s up to NRA and VCDL to share what plans they have developed to see how their detailed strategies compare… [More]
What happens here will be a bellwether for the midterms. We’re either serious about this — and willing to do all the necessary things — or we’re not and we won’t.
Although the board of the Canfield Fair were forced by law to allow carrying of firearms in open areas, they saturated “No Guns” signs on almost every building. [More]
Their motto is “Something to crow about!” What they’re crowing is, “In your faces, gun owners!”
These lands belong to the people, and the people have the right to keep and bear arms. [More]
As Commander-in-Chief, this would be an easy and very popular fix with gun owners. Republicans facing midterms and “gun rights” groups take note how this would benefit you and get behind this now.
That Kinzinger is evidently unaware of this (or aware but deliberately lying by omission about it) is no surprise. [More]
Photo caption contest winner: How you can tell Adam Kinzinger is lying.
ICYMI:
Crime is down and the enemy is furious. What’s not to like? At the risk of infuriating MAGA loyalists, in a word, infringements. [More]
Which plan will you go with? Help the administration see where it’s going off the rails and needs a course correction, or kill the messenger?
Johns Hopkins has once more beclowned itself as a purveyor of agenda driven “junk science” [More]
If we can’t believe prohibitionist gunquacks, who can we believe?
