Calling All Fudds

State attorneys: hunting rifles are not “constitutionally” protected in Connecticut… Whether or not they are constitutionally protected, they are certainly democratically protected,” Perry said. “As a rule, something that is popular doesn’t need constitutional protection, because it’s popular. [More]

And once they’re no longer popular?

Or in “common use” …?

The question nobody asks collectivist monkeys like Joshua Perry is if the Constitution doesn’t protect me, what makes you think it protects you?

Your turn in the barrel, Fudds.

Just because Polyphemus promised to eat you last didn’t mean he wasn’t going to.

[Via WiscoDave]

Travel Advisory Shows Democrat Border Policy Endangers America

The Democrat strategy to do this is to bring in and subsidize more uncheckable Third Worlders from violence plagued tyrannies, set them on the superhighway to citizenship, and, among other “fundamental transformations,” eviscerate the Second Amendment. [More]

A plan comes together. And to think that some still say this has nothing to do with the Second Amendment…

Speaking of ‘Single Issues’…

I recognize this is a quite sensitive topic, one that some would say is outside of the purview of Thoughtful Money. But this issue does have important economic implications, and from what I hear from viewers, many regular Americans feel they just don’t have a good sense of the facts on this situation. So I’m willing to take the risk here. [More]

I wish the damn “gun rights groups” were.

[Via bondmen]

Devil’s Advocates

The Satanic Temple is taking on the Christian right. It’s fun to watch [More]

I wonder if Arwa Mahdawi and UK’s The Guardian would be as amused if the four loser Goths (and especially the morbidly obese hutt on the right who looks incapable of, uh, wiping) were “taking on” the Islamic State.

Now that would be “fun to watch.”

At least they know which rally to attend.

Speaking of Foreign Election Interference…

The left-leaning British Labour Party is sending nearly 100 members to U.S. battleground states to campaign for Vice President Kamala Harris ahead of the presidential election. [More]

First Amendment notwithstanding, how is this not that with election laws?

[Via Michael G]

Tester’s Billionaire Donors Put Lie to Democrats Being the Party of the Common Man

So much for Republicans being the “party of the rich” and Democrats being the “party of the common man.” [More]

The goal is to rule the common man, not to champion him. If they have to do that by setting up someone they consider a rube to pander to the Fudds, so be it.

The Mummy’s Curse

I imagine this is a fair depiction of the mental acuity of Kamala voters who find this inspirational.

We Don’t Have to Show You Any Stinking Citizenship Verification!

Nearly three months after Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose first sought access to federal citizenship verification records to help the Buckeye State ensure noncitizens don’t vote in the election, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas has yet to respond. [More]

Just call Frank a xenophobic white Christian Nationalist conspiracy theorist Nazi and that’ll be good enough for Democrat voters.

[Via Michael G]

Why Not, Indeed…

What does it say about opponents when all they reply with are ad hominem attacks and inane, cognitively dissonant declarations like “All of you who are crying for Voter IDs… it is nothing more than a PLOY for Maga and Trump to claim ‘VOTER FRAUD’ after Kamala Harris has won the election LEGITIMATELY.”

Commonsense Speech Safety Laws

Biden’s executive order targets modern manufacturing processes in ways that implicate the First Amendment. [More]

So if Democrats want to ban “misinformation” and now real information, what kind of information will still be “legal”?

The good thing is, the First Amendment says “Congress shall make no law…”

They’re not making it. The executive is!

American PsyOps

[More]

The ever subversive Matt Drudge continues making unreported in kind campaign contributions to the Democrat/Harris/Walz campaign, this time joining forces with “conservative” Matt Labash.

Do they believe we’ll ever vote for Vichycons if they sabotage MAGA or are they really just clandestine Democrat operatives?

A Safe Seat Democrat

The face diapers work as well as his “gun laws.” How’d they let the one guy in without one?

Let’s be clear. Allowing Trump to hold an event at MSG is equivalent to the infamous Nazis rally at Madison Square Garden on February 20, 1939 [More]

That may be you he’s talking about.

Solid blue district Democrats don’t even try to hide their Antifa affinities.

Or that they want your guns.

Verified by MonsterInsights