Connect the Dots

The Supreme Court ruled the Trump Administration can continue operations in Los Angeles to remove dangerous criminal illegal aliens from the streets [More]

So… elections have judicial consequences…?

And this actually does affect the “single issue”?

Go ahead, Democrats. Rebel not just against Trump but the Supreme Court.

[Via Jess]

Got a Minute?

That’s how long it took me to take the White House up on it’s invitation and send it Executive Order idea requests to include gun owner representatives on the Second Amendment Task Force, end the ban on private arms at military bases, and order the Army Corps of Engineers to finalize and implement the rule to allow guns on lands it controls.

Literally less than a minute for each of these. Of course, the various options for communicating I’ve already included in my articles are also easily doable.

Funny thing is, all three articles have generated plenty of comments, mostly petty squabbling, but I’m having a hard time finding more than a handful saying “Yes, I have done this and urged my friends to do it, too.”

[Via Henry Bowman]

Splitting Adams

Eric Adams eyed by Trump for Saudi Arabia ambassadorship – NYC mayor is facing pressure to quit his campaign for a second term. [More]

So give a boost to gun-grabber Cuomo? Be funny if Trump ends up endorsing the Democrat.

It all boils down to elites and their money.

As a “gun voter,” I say let New York continue its descent and the hell with them.

And don’t get me started on “Republican” Sliwa.

Donald Trump Can Rein in Army Corps of Engineers on Guns

These lands belong to the people, and the people have the right to keep and bear arms. [More]

As Commander-in-Chief, this would be an easy and very popular fix with gun owners. Republicans facing midterms and “gun rights” groups take note how this would benefit you and get behind this now.

We’re the Only Ones Distinguished Enough

Trump suggests ‘distinguished’ ex-military teachers could carry weapons at schools [More]

So… a new category of “Only Ones“…?

That’s not a FASTER requirement, and the program’s been working great.

It’s not a 2A requirement, either.

I gotta get this serial administration cheerleader some pom poms.

Related UPDATE

Fortunately, there’s a Constitutional alternative:

H.R. 5066: Safe Students Act – To repeal the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 and amendments to that Act.

If at first you don’t succeed

Unfortunately:

Prognosis 1% chance of being enacted

That and the guy floating unequal protection calls Massie “a third-rate Grandstander” (as opposed, I suppose, to a first-rate one?) and wants him out.

[Via Jess]

Judging the Judge

Federal judge rules Trump violated military law by activating National Guard in California – Judge Charles Breyer’s opinion echoed remarks he made during a three-day trial in which he questioned if presidents have any limits on when they can use the military [More]

I have Constitutional concerns about overreach, too, but this is different.

If a judge has personal skin in the game that makes impartiality impossible, isn’t he supposed to recuse himself?

Senior District Judge Charles R. Breyer, in violation of his oath of office, did knowingly and willfully use his judicial position to advance political gain while interfering with the President’s constitutional prerogatives and enforcement of the rule of law.

Why doesn’t this “news” story, affecting voter perception, mention that?

Do any?

And what’s in it for Democrats to let violence and chaos reign?

‘A Principled Conservative’

Hypocrisy was on full display on Wednesday’s Morning Joe as New York Times columnist David French joined the MSNBC show to discuss how Democrats should respond to President Trump on crime. Despite all the claims that Trump would be abusing his authority if he deployed the National Guard to blue cities, French, who, despite endorsing Kamala Harris, fancies himself as one of the few remaining principled conservatives left in America, advised Democrats to blame Trump for the 2020 crime crisis. [More]

Who’s “principles”…?

Voila!

[Via Michael G]

Democrats to Scream ‘Racist Disenfranchisement!’ in 3…2…1…

Trump previously attempted to impose voter ID via an executive order earlier this year in a wider election integrity action. In April, Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia struck down the portions of that order that related to voter identification requirements. [More]

That’s because she’s a treasonous anti-gun gynocrat who invents rules from the bench because no one has dragged her from it.

Trump’s DC Takeover Won’t Be a Success if Constitution is Ignored

Crime is down and the enemy is furious. What’s not to like? At the risk of infuriating MAGA loyalists, in a word, infringements. [More]

Which plan will you go with? Help the administration see where it’s going off the rails and needs a course correction, or kill the messenger?

It’s Gowdy Doody Time

Fox host Trey Gowdy: “We’re going to have to have a conversation of freedom versus protecting children. How many school shootings does it take before we’re going to have a conversation about keeping firearms out of — it’s always a young white male, almost always.” [More]

Yeah, except see the comments that follow.

Just in case anybody thought this fraud was a “conservative”…

Oh, look: Here he is “proving” he’s “one of us.”

And here he is weasel-wording for infringements.

So, naturally, Donald Trump has nothing but effusive praise for the guy. (But let Gowdy publicly criticize him and look how quickly he’ll be called a “loser.”)

[Via several of you]

My Friends, Ya Got Trouble

Trump to allow 600,000 Chinese students entry to US for college as trade talks with China press on [More]

That’s capital ‘C’ and it rhymes with ‘T’…

So… military age, huh?

Just in case anyone’s into numbers, that’s more than the active duty troops total for the spread-across-the-globe Army and Marine Corps combined…

This 3D chess makes my head hurt.

Tangentially Related UPDATE

What’s that word for the state owning the means of production again…?

Talk about gun control! This is what some are calling “pragmatic”? This line in particular recalls nothing so much as what Captain Kirk said to Jojo Krako:

Such ownership would not dictate policy from above, nor should it. But it would create a built-in incentive for the government to preserve a healthy firearms ecosystem.

Who’s dictatin’? We’re incentivizin’!

Good grief.

On This We Can Agree

Trump Says He Supports Expanding Concealed Carry to D.C. [More]

Great. So do I.

But there are some concerns about how he’s going about the “cleanup” that a few of us are concerned about that his apologists are dismissing as the gripes of disgruntled naysayers who only focus on the bad and ignore everything good he’s done.

I’m working on something to address all that.

[Via Jess]

Another One Bites the Dust

In a stunning and alarming development, U.S. Attorney Judge Jeanine Pirro confirmed that a woman traveling from New York to Washington, D.C., was arrested for plotting to assassinate President Donald Trump. [More]

Tell us who. Show us her social media. Name her Democrat influencers.

UPDATE

Nathalie Rose Jones, eh…?

More…

[Via bondmen]

Verified by MonsterInsights