Stealer’s Remorse

Shaun King defends buying $40K guard dog, complains he can’t get a gun [More]

Whines the racist moron who endorsed the old commie who threatens to mandate this

And hats off to whoever coined “Talcum X.”

Too bad he returned the dog, no doubt because it scared the hell out of him. I wanted to see his utter incompetence at maintaining consistent control of his own excitement-triggering emotions prompt it to react predictably and end up costing him a lot more than 40 grand.

[Via Jess]

Tyrants of Color

Newly-signed NY law says toy weapons must be white, bright colors, or ‘translucent’ [More]

They can be white but they can’t be black or brown? Another brand new “progressive” idea, I see…

So will they be able to raid and throw you in the slammer if you picked up a vintage Johnny Seven OMA or Mattel Tommy-Burst Detective Set off of eBay? I don’t suppose anyone would be interested in exploring why we used to be able to play with these across the land without provoking a hysterical SWAT response…?

And on the flip side, do you think Kathy knows about Furious Mike?

[Via Jess]

Speaking of Toxic Messengers…

Are gun advertisements in FTC’s crosshairs? Critics decry ‘toxic’ messaging as firearm sales soar [More]

If tyrants don’t respect the Second, why should the First bother them any?

It figures this subversion originated with the monopoly of violence apparatchiks over at  USA Today, a Gannett Publication

[Via Remarks]

Rotten Apple

Apple said it was “aware of a report that this issue may have been actively exploited.” The issue could allow a potential attacker to take complete control of these devices. [More]

That’s curious, considering Apple CEO Tim Cook not only benefits from California’s exclusive, discriminatory, and corrupt “may (not) issue” laws but voices support for those who want to sue manufacturers out of existence…

Standing Orders

“A document that is classified in Washington, DC, is unclassified in Florida — one could say such a thing, but it is nonsensical,” he said. “And it calls into question the good faith of anyone who would make such a claim.” [More]

Now replace “document” with “right” and “classified” with “protected.” And switch locales to “Chicago” and “Cheyenne.”

I don’t know about White House documents, but it sure seems as far as an armed citizenry goes, all government officials swearing an oath to uphold “the supreme Law of the Land” have had their standing orders for centuries.

With ‘Republicans’ Like These…

“[The bill] protects the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens while also providing the opportunity for those suffering from mental illness to get the help and treatment they need before tragedy occurs,” Dolan said. [More]

Change that to “Dolan lied.”

I’ve touched on this tool before. I may just expand on this latest subversive and pathetic bid for attention after clearing out my existing queue.

[Via Sweet Babboo]

It’s in the Bag

“By instituting the clear bag policy here at the University of Akron we are aligning more with the safety policies across the NCAA, NFL, NHL and most MLB ballparks,” said Markus Jennings, Deputy Director of Athletic/COO. “The fan experience and safety are always at the forefront of every decision we make.” [More]

A lot sure has changed since Dad played there and such concerns were unheard of:

Shortly thereafter he was in the Marines taking Guam.

Earning His Cage

Venegas moved forward and attempted to steal another vehicle near the intersection of Desert Inn and Jones, according to police. The woman driving that car backed away from Venegas who then fired at her vehicle. [More]

That’s pretty damn irredeemable.

A dangerous sociopathic animal like this has shown he can’t be trusted without a custodian. Releasing him should not be a matter of time “served,” it should be a matter of establishing trust through restitution and penitence, things so-called penitentiaries fail miserably at achieving.

If it turns out he’s never ready, that’s tough. What’s the priority here?

Right: Using the results of not doing that as excuses to disarm you and me.

[Via 1Gat]

Ask Him No Questions He’ll Tell You No Lies

Get your questions answered TODAY at 9:00 PM EST on zoom with David Chipman. [More]

Unfortunately, that was last night.

For some reason, I’m reminded of the end of the 1960 film version of The Time Machine, where Filby finds George has returned to the future after having taken three books from his library. There are many books, so it’s impossible to tell which were taken, but they will be used to rebuild human civilization in a degenerate future.

“Which three would you take?” he asks Mrs. Watchett, the housekeeper (and, in effect, the movie audience).

What question would YOU like to ask Chipman?

Mine starts with “Why don’t you go …”

[Via WiscoDave]

It Could Be Stronger

Good opening statement. Now tell the rulers of cities and states doing this that their gun confiscation enforcers can get theirs from somebody else.

Stop 114

The measure essentially ends the sale of all firearms in Oregon for the foreseeable future and bans the sales of most shotguns and all standard capacity magazines forever. Possession of those items outside your home will be a criminal offense. If you are caught in possession of a standard capacity magazine INSIDE your home you will be required to prove that you had it before the law went into effect. There will be no presumption of innocence. [More]

If you’re an Oregon gun owner, consider this a muster call willingness test.

A Means to an End

A Minnesota Federal District judge defies the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision by applying “means-end scrutiny” and “narrow tailoring” to a case involving banning firearms at the Minnesota State Fair. [More]

He knows he can get away with it, hence giving SCOTUS and all gun owners the finger. If the Repubs don’t blow the “red wave,” they’ll have enough of a majority in the House to impeach, but not the 2/3 needed in the Senate to convict.

Naturally, the “progressive” Brennan Center says “if the impeach­ment power is used to punish judges for their rulings, it under­mines the vital inde­pend­ence of our judi­cial branch.”

Well, Clinton appointee Tunheim already did that by ignoring the High Court’s precedent and deferring to political interests. And, as with all things leftist, it depends on who’s doing the impeaching.

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights