
Most in U.S. want stricter gun laws [More]
Complete with a deceptive video!
What they don’t say is what the poll respondents actually know, as opposed to how many are working on what the media tells them.
Coordinated saturation, anyone?
[Via Jess]
Notes from the Resistance

Most in U.S. want stricter gun laws [More]
Complete with a deceptive video!
What they don’t say is what the poll respondents actually know, as opposed to how many are working on what the media tells them.
Coordinated saturation, anyone?
[Via Jess]
The op-ed advocates doing away entirely with the Constitution. Why? The authors don’t quite put it this way, but the reason is that the Constitution fails to establish a pure democracy by plebiscite, and makes it difficult to use a transient majority to effect radical change. [More]
Then those who would rule us and who control all major means of communication wouldn’t need to just ignore it anymore.
It figures The New York Times would publish such a subversive screed. As for the ivory tower Harvard and Yale apparatchiks, when useful idiots are no longer needed, that which they’re helping bring into being generally finds a suitable place for “new people.”
[Via Michael G]
‘Rape Nazis’ Will Exploit Dobbs Decision and Re-Populate Nation with White People, Claims MSNBC Doomsday Nutter [More]
Talk about a “rightwing conspiracy theory”!
Sorry, Rodney. Not only is the answer “No,” but candidly, I don’t much want to.
[Via Michael G]
Mass killings database reveals trends, details and anguish in every US event since 2006 [More]
Brought to you by the usual agenda-hawking suspects in the DSM and academia.
You know what’s missing?
[Via CDT]
Are gun advertisements in FTC’s crosshairs? Critics decry ‘toxic’ messaging as firearm sales soar [More]
If tyrants don’t respect the Second, why should the First bother them any?
It figures this subversion originated with the monopoly of violence apparatchiks over at USA Today, a Gannett Publication…
[Via Remarks]
Is junior okay? [More]
He’s better than you, shameless apologist for fascists. A “phoenix”? Really? From the ashes of Democrat cities?
And I notice none of his legitimate concerns are being addressed. It figures the Daily News would call this a “meltdown.”
I didn’t realize HRT was involved. I remember a real meltdown I caused with one of their jackboot lickers when I asked a simple question.
Soon after that, he heard someone say, “Wo, wo, wo.” And another person added, “Wait a minute. We hit an Airbus.” [More]
If the government can get away with a coverup of this magnitude, with full corporate and establishment media complicity, it can literally get away with anything.
Did someone just say something about trust…?
[Via bondmen]
“Having recently gone through a time of intense crisis, I now understand that I am suffering complex mental health issues…” [More]
Thank you, Captain Obvious!
The other ones either suffering complex mental health issues or just being whores for their jobs are the “Authorized Journalists” who indulge and encourage such utter nonsense by referring to a singular person as “they.”
And is/are he/they microaggressing against himself/themselves when he/they says/say “I” instead of “we”?
How many spirits does The Guardian’s Australian Deputy Culture Editor think are in there, and why is it there’s never a herd of swine around when you need one?
Meanwhile, back at the farm, it looks like he’s setting things up to become a leading anti-gun spokesman, what with leaving them lying around with kids, and a one-year-old “pick[ing] up a loose bullet [sic] and put[ting] it in her mouth.”
Repression, Terror, Fear: The Government Wants to Silence the Opposition [More]
Making this all the more believable.
Aided and abetted by social media and the DSM. One fantasy I have is that someday, government collusion with these “private” entities to suppress truthful reporting will be proven in court and First Amendment violators, both government instigators, and their de facto “agents,” will receive the punishments they deserve.
[Via bondmen]

Leftists freak out over one word concerning FBI at Trump’s home … It’s a “search,” not a “raid.” [More]
Hence the JBT with the machinegun.
Note how all the major players forego “home” in favor of “compound”:

They tell me that “your content has violated our Misleading Content policy. Please visit our Community Guidelines page blah, blah, blah”. Whatever. [More]
I confess I know next to nothing about this blog– I saw a post about censorship over at WRSA and that caught my interest seeing as how that’s exactly the reason I had to go through all the hassle of abandoning my Blogspot home of 17 years and starting this continuation blog. I see he, too, is the victim of a new Google censorship focus, which means no matter what he does, there are no assurances that work he spends portions of his life on won’t be summarily removed with no warning and no recourse.
Fortunately, that most invaluable of resources, the Internet Archive/ Wayback Machine* had his back on this one. I don’t see what the problem was with it, but then again, I saw no problem with what I posted either.
* I’ve been throwing some money their way once a year because I do find them so indispensable. Case in point: All my Examiner “Gunwalker” stuff would be gone from the net if not for them. And doesn’t that tell you just about everything you need to know about the DSM…
SIMON: And why not just call the police? [More]
Since it’s obvious how the anti-gun male is trying to steer things, pretty unsuccessfully, by the way, she should have just answered “What are you, a f-ing idiot?” and then asked if there were any men she could talk to.
[Via Jess]
Leaked ATF Resignation Letter Shows Agents’ Frustration Over Politicization [More]
Funny. This is real journalism.
How come we’re not seeing it from any other “news” outlets?
[Via Jess]
Well, it turns out there are photos. And here they are, published for the first time. [More]
And this made the ever-sold-out Drudge.
Sr. Bedoya, the floor is yours:
Admissible evidence? We ain’t got no admissible evidence. We don’t need no admissible evidence. I don’t have to show you any stinking admissible evidence!
Is this really all they want us to need? What honest man wouldn’t rebel against that?
Funny. They don’t invite comments.
Ted Cruz Slams Boot on Table During Senate Hearing on FBI Oversight [More]
He should have planted it up lying sack Wray’s…
Who’s responsible for what goes out on his watch? And it’s not like this crap and worse hasn’t been documented and objected to for years (except, of course, by the DSM).
[Via Jess]

“In our nation’s 246-year history, there has never been an individual who is a greater threat to our republic than Donald Trump. He tried to steal the last election using lies and violence to keep himself in power after the voters had rejected him,” the elder Cheney says in the ad, which the younger Cheney started running on Thursday, a week and a half before she faces a Trump-endorsed challenger in the Republican congressional primary Wyoming’s single congressional seat. [More]
And by “Trump” he means anyone who supported the agenda he campaigned on and who still doubts the official J6 narrative.
This is what someone the DSM calls a “staunch gun advocate” with ultra-establishment insider loyalties looks like:
“Whether or not there’s some measure there in terms of limiting the size of the magazine that you can buy to go with a semiautomatic weapon — we’ve had that in place before. Maybe it’s appropriate to re-establish that kind of thing…
Hey Dick: Don’t you have somebody to shoot in the face or something?
(This came across the transom after I submitted my latest AmmoLand piece on Liz Cheney getting longtime gun-grabber Kevin Costner’s support, which may be out later today.)
UPDATE
Here.
Hundreds of words devoted to smearing an entire police force as racist, as so racist they would rather be unemployed than work for a black person… And only after 18 — 18! — paragraphs do these lying pigs come across with the truth: that these same people had no problem working under a black town manager before. [More]
Yeah, I kinda figured it was just her…
Thing is, those CNN propaganda subjects will never know the rest of the story, will they?
Just as intended.
[Via Michael G]