Club for Metastasizing

Club for Growth Distances Itself Further From Trump [More]

Hey, cheap labor über alles, right, rope-selling capitalists? And to be clear– this is not about the avatar. It’s about the people who believed in what he said he stood for.

Good thing this has nothing to do with that “single issue”. And I have that on good authority.

The commies love having useful idiot bourgeoisieuntil they’re no longer needed.

This is It?

Sarah Beth Clendaniel, 34, has been charged with conspiring with a neo-Nazi leader in Florida, Brandon Clint Russell, 27, who authorities say encouraged attacks that would cause a “cascading failure” of the energy grid. [More]

These two low-hanging fruit losers are the best examples of the “right-wing extremist”greatest threat Chris Wray and Merrick Garland tell us are the bane of the Republic…?

Funny thing about that

[Via Michael G]

‘Other Purposes’?

H.R. 660: To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to require the safe storage of firearms, and for other purposes. [More]

159 treasonous Democrats have signed on as co-sponsors, and there’s a companion bill in the Senate.

Chances of passage with a Republican House are low, but you never know when the planets will converge to persuade the Vichycons to jump ship.

[Via Jess]

The Devil in the Details

This technical change pushes “others” within the definition of “assault weapon” under Connecticut’s ban… While residents of other states are able to register these firearms with the ATF, or change the short barrels for longer ones to make them legal, the ATF has stated that it will not permit any such registrations from Connecticut residents due to Connecticut’s “assault weapon” ban. Nor will changing out the barrels avoid redesignation as banned “assault weapons” under Connecticut law. [More]

Damned if they did, damned if they didn’t.

Rough Around the Pledges

Something as benign, but important, as acknowledging our Constitution and our flag, should not be controversial. Guess who opposed this? Virtually every democrat on the committee. Over an hour was spent by democrats arguing against this basic requirement of civics. [More]

It’s not like they’ll mean it when they say it any more than they did their oaths, and I have my own shared issues with the pledge. But just to make sure we know where they stand, House Dems confirmed their true colors are red.

[Via Henry Bowman]