Category: Second Amendment

Keep Your Shirt On

The complaint alleges that in Sept. 2022, just two days after A.B.’s teacher, Tom Griffin, covered students’ free speech rights in government class, A.B. was suspended from school for wearing a shirt that said “What part of ‘shall not be infringed’ do you not understand?” and featured an image of a rifle. [More]

Actually, this whole business of compulsory public education seems ripe for Bill of Rights challenges. The government, instituted among men to secure the Blessings of Liberty, is teaching our Posterity to be suspects and inmates, whose bodies are the property of the state, rather than sovereign Citizens.

And ol’ Tom sounds like a real piece of…work.

[Via Remarks]

You Keep Using That Word

Democratic Rep. Maxwell Frost says Florida’s proposed permitless carry law is ‘fascism’ [More]

Inigo has an observation.

This @$$hole again…

Then again, it is the standard Antifa indictment of anyone who’s not a raging commie.

Our best and our brightest don’t always go into politics, do they?

Stupid, overprivileged little sh!+head…

[Via Remarks]

Desensitizing

The specific additional “sensitive places” designations that are challenged in the amended lawsuit include parks, beaches, recreational facilities or playgrounds or areas owned or controlled by a state, county or local government unit, plus youth sports events, an airport or public transportation hub, and various health care facilities. These areas were designated “sensitive” because the New Jersey Legislature was determined to “continue minimizing the carry of handguns as much as possible,” the lawsuit notes. [More]

Honestly, who ever heard of anyone being attacked in any of those places?

An Age Old Question

The Second Amendment Foundation and its partners in a federal case challenging the federal prohibition on handgun sales to young adults ages 18-20, has filed a reply brief supporting their motion for summary judgment in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia. [More]

And the same Democrats who say they want them unarmed because they’re too immature are counting on 16-year-olds to vote for them.

Enforce Existing Intolerable Acts?

ATF Director Steve Dettelbach talks about enforcing gun laws amid surge in mass shootings [More]

Funny. That’s the same thing so many of our “gun rights leaders” say we need to do.

And note this admission:

But at ATF, our job is to take the rules and laws that Congress has passed…

Yeah, about that…

And while we’re on the subject, perhaps someone will be good enough to point out where Congress is delegated with the authority to infringe…?

[Via Jess]

Just to Be Clear

Just to be clear, there is no such thing as “constitutional carry”. The constitution didn’t give anyone the right to carry guns publicly without permits, background checks, or training. This term was fabricated by the gun lobby to push for its any guns to anyone everywhere agenda. [More]

Just to be clear, the Constitution (capitalized) does not “give” rights. That deception was fabricated by the lying citizen disarmament lobby to swindle the ignorant.

[Via bondmen]

UPDATE

And just to be clear, they’re a self-admitted hate group:

‘Other Purposes’?

H.R. 660: To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to require the safe storage of firearms, and for other purposes. [More]

159 treasonous Democrats have signed on as co-sponsors, and there’s a companion bill in the Senate.

Chances of passage with a Republican House are low, but you never know when the planets will converge to persuade the Vichycons to jump ship.

[Via Jess]

The Devil in the Details

This technical change pushes “others” within the definition of “assault weapon” under Connecticut’s ban… While residents of other states are able to register these firearms with the ATF, or change the short barrels for longer ones to make them legal, the ATF has stated that it will not permit any such registrations from Connecticut residents due to Connecticut’s “assault weapon” ban. Nor will changing out the barrels avoid redesignation as banned “assault weapons” under Connecticut law. [More]

Damned if they did, damned if they didn’t.

More Than Robbers Thwarted

The store owner was subsequently shot in the back by one of the suspects but managed to return fire with two of his legally-owned firearms. The store owner was able to strike one of the suspects multiple times, while the other suspect reportedly fled during the first struggle during the incident… [More]

Every f*****g liar who calls citizen disarmament “commonsense gun safety” would rather the store owner had been unarmed and killed so they could have more blood to dance in. And speaking of f*****g liars, check out the accompanying video.

Of course they’re talking about taking your guns — and doing more than talking whenever they can get away with it.

Deliberate frauds and/or useful idiots: There is no other kind of gun-grabber.

[Via Dan Gifford]

Meanwhile, Over at the Legion of Doom

(Wikipedia claims fair use.)

The coalition of 117 organizations called for the plan to include declaring a national emergency around gun violence, establishing a federal office for gun violence prevention and appointing a full-time director for the effort. [More]

Between them and the usual suspects…

Would trying to disguise Astroturf as grassroots be Assroots?

[Via Jess]

As Told to Jojo Krako

An act to amend Sections 171b, 171d, 171.5, 171.7, 626.9, 25610, 25850, 26150, 26155, 26165, 26170, 26175, 26185, 26190, 26195, 26200, 26205, 26210, 26220, 26225, 29805, and 30370 of, to add Sections 25350, 26162, 26206, and 26230 to, and to repeal and add Section 26202 of, the Penal Code, relating to firearms. [More]

Who’s infringin’? We’re amendin’.

[Via Dan Gifford]

Verified by MonsterInsights