‘No, No!’ Said the Queen. ‘Sentence First — Verdict Afterwards.’ 

But what are due process protections when it comes to the government’s intentional deprivation of a constitutionally protected right, or even a constitutionally protected “property” right, through ex parte proceedings? [More]

Well, we could go with the stare decisis version and defer to past acts of judicial tyranny, or we could go with a historical understanding to be guided by Amendments IV, V, and VI

That treacherous wretch Bill Lee has established his legacy.

Does Trump Truly Support the Second Amendment?

[W]e are not doing ourselves or those depending on us to stand for freedom any favors if we deliberately ignore Trump’s willful failures on guns. Because this is going to end one of two ways – strengthening his renewed bid for a return to the White House, or ending any chances of it. If he wins, we need to be able to collectively influence his 2A decisions and judicial appointments and get him to understand what the bad ones are before he makes them. If he loses, we need to be ready to do the same with whomever the Republicans nominate to carry the standard. [More]

Gun owners need to look and assess with no illusions if they hope to have any influence on how power, once granted, is ultimately wielded.

Pot Luck

Another Federal Judge Rejects the DOJ’s Argument That Cannabis Consumers Have No Second Amendment Rights [More]

And then there’s action on the restraining order front

I’ll bet a lot of “prohibited person” exclusions could be overturned with the right case, starting with the “one year” nonsense that has no bearing on proven proclivities for violence.

Concentrated Lies

“That is not a political issue. But it becomes one when Kentucky Republicans would rather ban books and pronouns and then make Kentucky a sanctuary state for weapons” [More]

Of course, it’s a political issue if you think you can vote on rights. And it’s not a question of banning books, it’s a question of not exposing children to sexual exploitation by deviants.

Speaking of banning books

Have you ever met a gun-grabbing Democrat (but I repeat myself) who wasn’t a chronic and habitual liar?

[Via bondmen]

Opinions are Like…

Opinion: Founding Fathers would want gun control today [More]

Just because William Lambers says so.

Forget all the research, scholarship, and documentation to the contrary– the useful idiots agreeing with him have no interest in confronting their ignorant prejudices with reality.

Interesting though, how “progressive” liars presume to speak for historical figures they also decry as racists. Kind of like when they lecture us about what Jesus wanted.

[Via Dan Gifford]

I Wish I Could Say He Was Wrong

“It also suggests that we have seen a paradigm shift in this country, that now Republicans see the anti-gun violence movement as being more powerful than the gun lobby,” Murphy said. [More]

And Vichycons like Bill Lee and the “bipartisan” Quislings aim to prove him right.

Republicans as a party just don’t seem to understand that ultimately, they need Americans who will not disarm more than we need them.

[Via Jess]

What Happens in Vegas

Three gun control bills were up for debate at the Nevada Legislature including one that raises the age to buy a semiautomatic weapon. [More]

Look for Democrat/union/rope-selling capitalist/”Only Ones” cabal in Clark County to fund the votes to impose tyranny on the rest of the Silver State.

And wait ’til you see who they’re plotting to pay to disarm you.

[Via Jess]

Time’s Up

HB 2005 could be voted in on the House Floor as early as tomorrow. It received its “Second Reading” today. That was the last stop before a vote. [More]

Since this was written yesterday, “tomorrow” means today.

Trust me, time travel is less convoluted than the lying machinations of citizen disarmament fanatics. There’s an Eloi/Morlock analogy in here somewhere.

If I get any future notices later today I’ll go back and update this post.

Machine Gun Charges Against Sheriff Recall Earlier Incidents and ‘Only Ones’ Elitism

But whether the top cops are innocent or guilty of charges is beside the real point gun owners should be concerned with. The militarization of police is what opens the door to exclusivity and enables corruption. And you’d better believe the officials and the deputies/officers they command would arrest any of us if they found us non-compliant with a “gun law.” The “Only Ones” hypocrisy reeks. [More]

Nice work if you can get it. The problem is, without a badge, you can’t, and therein lies the crux of police as “Only Ones.”

Cold Turkey for Authority Junkies?

In sum, § 922(d)(3) does not withstand Second Amendment scrutiny for much the same reasons that § 922(g)(3) does not. The law’s broad prohibition on the sale or transfer of firearms to unlawful users of controlled substances burdens the Second Amendment rights of those individuals to nearly the same extent as § 922(g)(3). And, as the Court found when assessing § 922(g)(3), our Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation does not support placing such a burden on the Second Amendment right. [More]

It would be rich if the person who ultimately got this part of the law overturned for good was Hunter Biden.

[Via Jess]

First Do Harm

That appears to be the mission statement for Opposite Day “progressive” gunquacks:

It’s the part of me that won’t give up on our AMA efforts to stop the public health crisis of gun violence, demanding waiting periods, universal background checks, red flag laws, and bans on assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines that our House of Delegates policy supports. Enough is ENOUGH. I’ll keep relentlessly showing up to accomplish those goals.

I wish he’d shake his rattles or yell a few times as Dr. Mbogo does. Makes you feel like he’s accomplishing something.

Don’t these charlatans have some children to give clot shots to?

[Via Antigone]

None Dare Call It Treason

Both chambers of the Washington State Legislature have now approved a historic ban on the sale of assault weapons in Washington state. [More]

They know they’re doing evil. They not only don’t care, they get off on it.

This will be resolved one of two ways: Either the Supreme Court will rule it unconstitutional, or the people who will not disarm will.

Then on to the next Intolerable Act

No Better About It. Late Means Never.

GOP pushes to arm staff, eliminate ‘ineffective’ gun-free school zones after Nashville shooting [More]

Where were they back when?

And now with zero chance of passing through the Schumer Senate to the Biden White House…

Consider it another Sealab Bizarro moment.

Verified by MonsterInsights