Category: citizen disarmament

Just Here for the Ratioing

So “Only Ones” can’t protect us…? And this evil little idiot’s solution is to not allow us to protect ourselves? And have them kill us if we don’t comply?

We’re the Only Ones Noncompliant Enough

[More]

I ran across this post from five years ago and it struck me as ironic that five years before that, when Mike Vanderboegh and I and a core of other activists were advocating for this, the concept was being put down by some “establishment” gun groups as extremists making us all look bad. (There was an article I wanted to link to but I can’t find it right now.)

I guess it’s only good if “Only Ones” do it?

Because What Could Be Safer Than Utter Helplessness?

You see what they’re doing by throwing neighborhood gang shootings into the mix and leaving out schools. Lies, damned lies, and leftist ivory tower eggheads with an agenda: Is there anything they DON’T know?

What they can’t refute:

100% of school shootings occur in “gun-free zones.”

[Via Starvin Larry]

Back to Square One

Gee, I wonder what happens next.

[Via Jess]

Guerillas in the Mist

Packs of “Fighting Age Males” in Military Uniforms Entering U.S. through Remote Arizona Town [More]

Brought to you by the same people who want your guns and smear anyone who opposes their subversion as “the greatest threat.”

Only embedded domestic enemies bent on the downfall of the Republic and the destruction/subjugation of its people would enable this.

[Via bondmen]

Once More Unto the Breach

At noon, on Thursday July 18, the 2024 New Mexico Special Legislative Session will begin. [More]

No word yet on gun stuff, but you can bet when they get around to it the goal will be more edicts.

Related UPDATE

Especially with hysteria like this as backdrop:

New Mexico governor cites ‘dangerous intersection’ of crime and homelessness, wants lawmakers to act

Being Democrats, you can bet whateveer they do will only increase crime and homelessness.

[Via Jess]

We Believe in the Second Amendment BUT…

Massachusetts House and Senate negotiators have released a compromise version of a sweeping gun bill that supporters say builds on the state’s existing gun laws, including a crackdown on difficult to trace “ghost guns,” while safeguarding the rights of gun owners. [More]

If they’re going to start out with a lie, several here that I can identify, what’s my incentive to read further and keep being lied to?

Way to continue being megaphones for tyranny, Associated Press and “real reporter” Steve LeBlanc!

[Via Steve T]

Half-Full Faith and Credit

“Imagine your surprise if you are just minding your own business, wherever you are, Ohio, Alabama, Texas, and all of a sudden, your local constable is, like, “Guess what sucker, California says you’re not allowed to have any guns anymore, give them up.” [Watch]

Gun laws don’t work both ways, so your permit and lawful ownership won’t be recognized there.

Heads they win, tails you lose.

[Via Jess]

No Thanks to Vichycons

After helping the Democrats pass the bill, the Oregon House Republicans, in a cynical and disgraceful display of bait and switch, posed on the Capitol steps with a giant fake check that they said was going to be used for a lawsuit against the bill they had just helped pass…. Firearms Policy Coalition has announced their intention to fight this plainly unconstitutional law. They are currently seeking Oregon residents who could be plaintiffs in the case. This could be the fight so many have been waiting for. [More]

I’m if there are any creatures more self-servingly useless than Oregon establishment “Republicans”…

In the Spirit of Aloha

Hawaii’s Democrat Gov. Signs Bill Barring People Under the Age of 21 from Buying or Possessing Ammunition [More]

The Kapu Tradition lives on in the post-Igeocracy.

They know they’ll end up losing and the money could be spent on needed things, but they don’t care. And no one will hold them to account because stupid citizenship malpractitioners dominate the population.

[Via bondmen]

It’s Not Like It Says ‘Shall Not Be Infringed’ or Anything…

Third Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in NRA-ILA-Supported Challenge to Delaware’s ban on “assault weapons” and “large-capacity magazines.” [More]

Here’s their weasel-wording to justify tyranny.

Mark W. Smith navigates the fabricated complexities.

[Via Jess]

The Stupid… It Burns…

The analogy of a critical thinking-debilitating virus deliberately released into a target demographic hardly seems far-fetched.

And remember: ABC is Disney.

[Via WiscoDave]

Too Connected to Fail

Citigroup finances ‘weapons of war’ while refusing banking services to firearms industry [More]

And now, the rest of the story:

Now it can be told: The bank that exposed the federal government to the greatest potential loss during the government bailout was Citigroup, which received a grand total of $476.2 billion in cash and guarantees…

You’d think NSSF would have found that worth mentioning.

Who thinks Uniparty politicans at the trough will be receptive to gun owning taxpayers saying “No more”?

The Arbiter of Reasonableness

Crooks, who was killed by security forces, used an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, a powerful and, in the US, easily available weapon that in more reasonably administered countries would be off-limits to private individuals. [More]

For a European historian, this guy sure is forgetful.

[Via Matt L]

Defense Against Carjacking by Armed Security Highlights Sotomayor’s Elitism on Guns

It’s good that Sotomayor’s security was able to defend themselves and repel a predator. It’s inexcusable that she won’t admit she has been wrong about our right to do the same. [More]

It’s a big club and you ain’t in it.

An Effective Combination

For the crime of running a huge survey on defensive gun use in the U.S. that was not forced into the narrative structure of today’s gun-control activism, William English, an assistant professor at Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business, has been subpoenaed, attacked in The New York Times and by many other “mainstream” outlets and, basically, pilloried in order to, as he put it in The Wall Street Journal, “warn off other academics thinking of doing similar research, and to influence courts where states are losing on the merits.” [More]

Or as the Keeper always said:

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights