One in Five Britons Say They Are Willing to Engage in Political Violence to Stop National Decline [More]
They don’t think their rulers know that?
[Via bondmen]
Notes from the Resistance
One in Five Britons Say They Are Willing to Engage in Political Violence to Stop National Decline [More]
They don’t think their rulers know that?
[Via bondmen]
Armed Attorneys Richard Hayes and Edwin Walker discuss The Tragedy That Broke the Background Check System.This is about more than just erroneous firearm denials—it’s about a federal policy change that’s leading to massive Second Amendment infringements, and a branch of the ATF most people have never heard of. [More]
So… Fix NICS isn’t everything the quislings at NSSF crack it up to be…?
I look forward to an editorial from Larry Keane explaining how it would comport with Bruen’s text, history, and tradition standard.
[Via Jess]
If only some internal team existed to catch this stuff before it becomes an issue…
Well, I guess if the “gun groups” don’t care about not being included, I shouldn’t…
[Via Jess]
Southwest Washington gun shop seeks US Supreme Court review of magazine ban [More]
It’d go a lot further if the DOJ were serious about this and offered its support.
[Via Jess]
Zohran Mamdani Hires Private Security After Calling to Defund Police [More]
Why is Breitbart so focused on his anti-cop stance they ignore his total citizen disarmament fanaticism? The security company he’s hiring uses NYPD moonlighters, meaning they’re armed.
[Via bondmen]
Petitioner contends (Pet. 7-21) that 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) violates the Second Amendment as applied to her by subjecting her to “permanent” disarmament based on a years-old conviction for a nonviolent felony. Pet. 15. That contention lacks merit. The Department of Justice recently revitalized an administrative process under 18 U.S.C. 925(c) through which convicted felons can regain their ability to possess firearms. Given that process, petitioner cannot show (Pet. 15) that Section 922(g)(1) subjects her to “permanent” disarmament. [More]
Yeah, well, it would help if you guys who make noises that 2A is not a “second class right” would let everybody know what the non-arbitrary criteria are, but as yet you’ve ignored my FOIA request well past the statutory deadline. Are you going to make me file a complaint and then drag that on forever just like the Democrats? And then further discourage such rightful fact-finding by denying recovery of attorney fees?
Sorry if I can’t knee-jerk spin this as a positive. Because this really doesn’t tell us “how,” and a right delayed is a right denied.
[Via Jess]
Court Rules Cops Can’t Stop-and-Frisk You For Carrying A Gun [Watch]
I’ve been asked if this means no more Terry stops and pat-downs, but I don’t think so, because those require a “reasonable suspicion” that a suspect has committed a crime, and already forbids just make something up, although this ruling could conceivably make some “Only Ones” more hesitant to do that.
Perhaps someone who actually knows what he’s talking about on this can weigh in and educate me.
More questions: Why did the “pro-Second Amendment” Justice Department prosecute and will it appeal?
[Via Jess]

War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength, and junkies having sex in the streets is “public safety. With Democrats, every day is Opposite Day. [More]
It’s instructive to note who the Democrats want to keep on the streets and who they want to forcibly remove from society.
Related UPDATE
A comment needs responding to. But I’m posting my reply here because one thing I insist on is keeping article comments on topic to what’s being invited for discussion, in this case, the inevitable utter failure of areas under total Democrat control and the dangers of expansion. To respond to points raised over at AmmoLand would hijack and derail that discussion and take focus off the reason I wrote the article and what I felt important to call attention to.
I gotta say, I can’t help but feel there’s a sentiment I’m picking up from that comment that I’m not doing enough. Or that I owe more. Don’t go there. Or do, and let’s compare records.
To start off with we can’t “all” agree the problem is mostly with Democrats even though it’s true. Half the country votes for them and will continue to do so regardless of what lies, crimes, perversions and outright treasonous subversions are exposed. But I didn’t write this to unquestioningly praise Republicans, which seems to be the comment poster’s takeaway. If that’s the case, I challenge him to find one 2A writer who has called out errant Republicans – including Donald Trump– more often and consistently than I have. Recent case in point: Who else is pointing out the Fort Stewart shooting exposes his past unkept promise on private arms at military bases?
The purpose of this piece was not to offer a grand manifesto for restoring the Republic and living happily ever after, just to expose another danger by using a story I haven’t seen on any other “gun sites” to illustrate a larger point. If we’re going to go beyond that, my response does not belong under an article on East Harlem degenerates and the politicians who enable them, and whose agenda will spread the misery wherever they gain power.
But yeah, I’ve been involved in plenty of constructive advocacy/activism efforts over the years. And ultimately, my “advice,” which seems what’s being asked for, centers on never expecting anything from a reader – or a politician or other “leader”– I don’t expect and hold myself to: Try to stay informed, look into things that could present problems or opportunities, speak out when needed, join with/assist those I find worthy when I can, stay armed, trained, and prepared, defy and disobey bad laws, and strive to live the principles I espouse. That by itself is not enough, which means my goal is to encourage others to do the same. And if enough of us, say Three Percent or so, are united in this ideology, the tyrants will have to think more than twice before overreaching. Face it—the Second Amendment is still, for the most part, working. Otherwise, there’d be nothing to stop mass confiscation, which you’ll notice “they” haven’t dared try (Addendum: After Katrina).
Mark McCloskey Re-Takes Possession of AR-15 He Held to Ward Off BLM Protesters [More]
There’s a particular satisfaction to forcing the government to surrender property back to the rightful owner.
[Via bondmen]
GUARANTEEING FAIR BANKING FOR ALL AMERICANS [More]
The rope-selling capitalists have been banking on disarmament for a long time. A long time.
You can deposit those checks now, Teagan…
Questions: Will this apply to anti-gun payment processors making decisions on their own without bureaucratic regulatory pressure? And anybody know if and how Merchant Category Codes may be affected?
More “geeky banking details” here…
[Via Jess]

President Trump promised to allow weapons carry (and later CCW) by military personnel on bases way back in 2015 [More]
If not now, when? Why not ask him?
Cornell Grad Killed in N.Y.C. Skyscraper Shooting Was Shot After Stepping Out of Panic Room- Julia Hyman, 27, was apparently checking whether the coast was clear when she was shot by Shane Tamura on Monday [More]
Switching to a different case, as sympathetic as I may be to the devastating loss someone like Manuel Oliver suffered, that all takes a back seat in light of his demands that the law render us all equally as helpless in life or death situations as this poor girl.
Someone’s grief is not a claim on our rights. I’m sorry they’ve been driven crazy. But attack me and mine, and motivations don’t matter.
[Via bondmen]
Machine guns are dangerous weapons that aren’t commonly “possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes,” and a law that criminalizes their possession is therefore consistent with the tradition of firearm regulation in the country, the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit said Thursday. [More]
So… rather than being the cure-all for what ails us, “common use” can be a trap to limit and ultimately render RKBA obsolete?
[Via Jess]

Virginia Democratic gubernatorial candidate Abigail Spanberger took $50,000 from a Chinese businessman tied to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), according to campaign finance records. [More]
Hey, she’s just helping them prevent “human rights violations.”
[Via Jess]
This gives Cuomo the chance to be the candidate who can turn the page, and lift us out of hating each other. [More]
You really don’t get it, do you, David Marcus?