Notes from the Resistance
Scroll down for “SB401: Gut-n-Replace Assault weapon ban in Hawaii heads to senate floor” and several links that follow. [More]
There are a ton of other interesting stories, too, about corruption, incompetence, and more. Democrats sure have ruined that place.
Milwaukee Democrat Rep Encourages People to Obstruct ICE from Arresting Criminal Illegal Aliens [More]
LOCK HIM UP: LAWLESS WISCONSIN GOVERNOR Issues Guidelines to State Employees to Shield Illegal Aliens from ICE Agents [More]
Guess who backs Clancy and Evers…?
And what would legislative and executive be without the judiciary?
Now, if only our “gun rights leaders” wondered.
[Via Michael G]
Most school shooters grew up with guns as key part of social life, study suggests [More]
This one is begging to be deconstructed. I know what I’m working on this afternoon.
[Via Dan Gifford]
That leads to an unusual suggestion by Ludwig to curb gun violence: “zoning commercial so that you have more foot traffic in a neighborhood.” [More]
And seeing how this guy rolls, expect those zones to be “gun-free.”
You shouldn’t have to tell a “scientist” that correlation is not causation. I don’t get much foot traffic around my house, yet somehow we manage to behave ourselves.
We’ve got a pretty good idea about why some neighborhoods are different from others. But everyone is afraid to talk about it.
[Via Dan Gifford]
“Effective immediately, Special Agents in Charge (SACs) approval and Deputy Assistant Director (DAD) concurrence is now mandatory for all NICS alerts. NICS alerts may only be utilized in cases involving suspected violations of federal firearm statutes…” [More]
You know, the ones the F0unders would have approved of.
Great job, NAGR.
I encourage you to share this effective deconstruction of gun-grabber lies with everyone within your sphere of influence.
[Via Jess]
Nevada Assembly passes bill banning people under 21 from owning semiautomatic guns [More]
Thanks a high population center filled with Democrats/union workers and rope-selling capitalists for imposing their will on the heartland, just like they attempted with Question 1.
And no, I shed no tears.
[Via Jess]
It might seem hard to outdo Hogg’s ridiculous cognitive dissonance, but one lawmaker has given him a run for his money, and an ostensible “Republican” one at that. [More]
We know which side they would have chosen.
But it’s also that part of the law that worries Second Amendment advocates who have long voiced opposition to the law on several fronts, including the statute’s effect on gun owners who are not the subject of the actual order — such as the parents of a 6-year-old named in an extreme risk protection order. [More]
By hook or by crook…
[Via Jess]
The matter began when Philpotts, while facing rape charges, was convicted of a weapons charge in 2018. The charge, possessing weapons under disability, often means a person convicted of a violent crime cannot have a firearm. In Philpotts’ case, he was merely accused of a violent crime. The rape charges against him were later dropped, but his firearm conviction remained. [More]
That would appear to be a no-brainer. Unfortunately, we’re dealing with no gunsers.
[Via JG]
Genocide-minded maniacs never seem to flesh that out.
The vacuous smirker’s somehow got a million followers, but from the ratioing this latest bit of idiocy received, I suspect they’re mostly people hes trolling. As for the post he started with, imagining mass gun confiscation, as noted before, the truth is they wouldn’t dare. Which means the Second Amendment is working (right you are, Nicholas).
There’s one other thing he’s forgetting, besides the obvious (NSFW): Bill Clinton’s Rules of Engagement. If we can’t turn to the Constitution for protection, what makes cheerleaders for tyranny think they can?
“I will get rid of gun-free zones on schools, and — you have to — and on military bases,” Trump said, to scattered cheers during a campaign rally on Thursday night. “My first day, it gets signed, okay? My first day. There’s no more gun-free zones.” [More]
Don’t get too excited. He said that nine years ago.
[Via Henry]
Most Dangerous Places in the U.S. in 2024-2025 [More]
They just keep on corroborating…
How many have Democrat mayors, city councils and DAs who push citizen disarmament “laws”?
[Via Steve T]
GOP Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte is inviting law-abiding gun manufacturers in Colorado to come to his state in a new video ad [Watch]
I guess they had to add that “law-abiding” part.
Will any go?
Will any tell the state they’re cutting them off?
[Via Antigone]
A law recently signed by Republican Governor Kay Ivey makes it a felony, punishable by up to 10 years in prison, to possess parts intended to convert pistols into machine guns. [More]
That’s quite the “unwavering support“…
New England serial killer fears heighten after eighth idyllic town rocked by gruesome discovery [More]
The only people the laws stopped were the “law-abiding,” that is, the ones being slaughtered. [More]
They haven’t learned a thing since Mumbai. Then again, noting all the “commonsense gun safety laws” here, what have “we” learned?
Rage and despair after brazen attack kills 26 in Kashmir [More]
And naturally, the “law-abiding” victims were disarmed and their attackers were not.
I just spent the last hour writing an article for AmmoLand on this and will share the link when it’s up.
Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses a very innovative argument in the matter of Williams v. United States, yet another challenge to 18 USC Sec. 922(g)(1) the ban on felons possessing firearms. Today, we take a look at a crafty argument based upon the Commerce Clause and how, if accepted, could undo dozens of Federal gun laws. [Watch]
Good. That said, a review of text, history, and tradition of the Commerce Clause at the time of ratification would not have supported the expansion and usurpation of unintended powers to allow the feds to get their hooks into citizen disaramament, treasonous subsequent stare decisis saying they could notwithstanding.
And raising Tenth Amendment arguments isn’t exactly “new”:
Also, it’s helpful to keep in mind that the MFFA and its clones are really a states’ rights exercise, a challenge to federal commerce clause power on Tenth Amendment and other grounds. It is more about federal power than firearms.
[Via Jess]
