Notes from the Resistance
So, what else could the “terrified students and professors” do besides “cower”? [More]
“Run, Hide, Fight,” the armed SECOND responders advise. What if you can’t outrun a bullet, can’t keep the monster from finding you, and can’t get close enough to attack back with a fire extinguisher or chair?
If Biden’s motion ultimately prevails, other categories of prohibited persons become vulnerable to challenge, as well as records required to be kept by Federal Firearms Licensees, which themselves have no historical counterpart. The possibilities for reclaiming rights seem boundless. [More]
It would be deliciously ironic if, in saving his own skin, this degenerate saved ours…
The House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Federal Government Surveillance will hold a hearing on Wednesday, December 13, 2023, at 2:00 p.m. ET. The hearing, “Second Amendment Rights Empower Women’s Rights,” will examine how firearms ownership empowers women across America and assists in self-defense as violent crime continues to plague the nation. [More]
I got this tip last week and scheduled it to post this morning so people wouldn’t forget.
I hope somebody points out that voting for Democrats negates women’s rights.
To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the distribution of 3D printer plans for the printing of firearms, and for other purposes. [More]
It’s those “other purposes” I’m interested in.
Boy, that’s a lot of traitors.
Eh… “1% chance of being enacted…”
Besides, the genie’s out of the bottle. And we will not disarm.
Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals denies motion for en banc hearing of challenge against Illinois’ gun and magazine ban. “No judge in regular active service has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc, and all members of the original panel have voted to deny panel rehearing,” the docket said Monday. “The petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is therefore DENIED.” [More]
Will this be a catalyst for SCOTUS?
“Let me just state unequivocally, the public health order has been in effect three months and it’s working,” the governor said at Monday’s press conference. [More]
So how many of those arrests were ordinary concealed carriers caught up in the order, as opposed to known troublemakers? And how many of the arrested will be back on the street for Christmas?
[Via Jess]
US District Court of Southern District of California finds that gun purchase restrictions on 18-20 year olds in California is constitutional under the 2nd Amendment. [More]
What kind of evil, lying traitor would you have to be to rule that way? So much for judicial conduct.
His treason will, of course, eventually be overturned, provided the Republicans don’t blow ’24…
[Via Jess]
I will believe any of our celebrity politicians when they say they sympathize and truly regret and resent this monstrous atrocity when they move to restore the observance and practice of the second amendment everywhere. Then and only then will we know they truly disapprove of Americans being murdered en masse. [More]
I was doing some research over the weekend, came across this comment on the old blog, and thought it merited renewed attention.
It’s fair to ask how, in anyone’s universe, such conduct would not be grounds for removal from the court, disbarment from the practice of law, and criminal prosecution. [More]
Do radical Democrat prohibitionists really want to tell tens of millions of gun owners that the courts are no longer available to them to seek redress against infringements of their fundamental rights?
Nice to see the Pence Vichycon Troye screwing things up worse than the ineffectual Littman. [More]
Citing HuffPo to justify citizen disarmament really shows the new girl for what she is.
I wonder when these “influencers” are going to start distancing themselves…
So much for “the supreme Law of the Land”…
The Second Amendment Foundation has filed a federal lawsuit against the Cortland, N.Y. Housing Authority, alleging Second Amendment violations by prohibiting tenants from possessing firearms on CHA premises. [More]
A few years back I found one in Ohio that does that, but I’m not a lawyer and don’t know anyone who lives there to see if they want to be a plaintiff:
Also from SAF:
A federal appeals court has struck down a New York state law requiring private property owners to post signs allowing concealed carry on property open to the public as part of a massive decision dealing with several separate challenges of the Empire State’s post-Bruen gun control legislation. [More]
Huh. Second Circuit did something right in all its wrong…
Mark Walters just called and asked me to join him on air this afternoon at 4 Eastern to talk about all the goings-on in the gun world.
Whatever will we find to talk about?
You know the drill: AAR website to listen/watch/find a station.
You misspelled “assault,” morons.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Rep. Hank Johnson reintroduce bill with emphasis on gun violence prevention [More]
Are you really ignorant enough to believe that’s what this will do, “real reporter” Jennifer Gerson?
“And I’s“…?
Here are the Democrat politicians who want us dead.
But no one’s talking about taking your guns.
“0% chance“…?
Now all we’ve got to do is see if the House Republicans are going to implode, because they’ve already got their share of gun-grabbing traitors.
[Via Jess]
Much like Missouri state lawmakers used a so-called trigger law to ban abortion, St. Louis Mayor Tishaura Jones has now signed a trigger law that could ban open carry of firearms in the city. [More]
In other words, it won’t change a thing.
Ain’t it just like Tishuara?
And did everyone catch Obama’s old “Chicago to Cheyenne” tactic?
[Via bondmen]
Polls reveal most Americans favor laws limiting the capacity of firearms magazines to 10 rounds, and the New York Times reports that several generally pro-gun federal legislators have expressed support for such legislation. [More]
I read that and my immediate thought was “Who?” and to go kick some Vichycon @$$.
So to prove that he links to a 10-year-old article and the “pro-gun federal legislators” were Harry Reid and other Democrats?
This is “thinking seriously”…?
[Via bondmen]
