The Empire Strikes Back

After 2 Million FOID Card Holders Rebel Against Pritzker, Democrats Target Illinois Gun Owners’ Driver’s Licenses [More]

He’s altering the terms of the deal. Pray he does not alter them further.

Hey, what was the text, history and tradition of operating a private horse-drawn carriage on throughways at the time of the Founding…?

[Via Jess]

Checking Your Privilege

NFA still standing tells us we can’t rely on assumptions about rulings that say the state can’t tax a right. That said, these stupid, smirking cows have no idea of the elemental forces they’re tampering with…

Running Out the Clock

US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has decided to hear en banc the Bianchi v. Brown MD “assault weapon” ban case and, thus, prevent a likely favor 2A ruling from being issued by the three-judge panel of that court. [Watch]

And as I’ve said, if the Republicans blow the elections and Dems manage to change SCOTUS, we’ll get to see which side is more serious.

Democrats Offer Anti-Gun Insurrectionist in New York Special Election

And what’s worse is that while Suozzi showed he perfectly understands the ultimate last resort provision against tyranny behind the Second Amendment, he actively works to undermine it in his quest for power over the lives of his countrymen. [More]

Suozzi’s idea of “gun violence prevention” is to disarm you and me and start an armed uprising.

On This We Can Agree

It is fully within our power to stop this epidemic. [More]

Absolutely. Just not by doing anything this evil dotard’s handlers are lying to us about…

Starting with, it’s not an “epidemic.”

Wake me when the “school to grave pipeline” is plugged.

[Via Antigone]

We’re the Only Ones Careless Enough

They have no intention of giving it back to you unless forced to anyway…

If they can deny your fundamental rights and take your guns from you without due process, what do they care? It’s just been established they can practically get away with anything.

[Via WiscoDave]

Pro-Democrat ‘Gun Safety’ Groups Evidently Fine with Armed Illegals Entering Country

So it’s curious that those who demand the loudest for gun prohibitions infringing on the rights of “law-abiding citizens” are doing more than turning a blind eye on the millions of illegal aliens, many of them military-age men, that have been pouring across the border for years and are now surging in unprecedented numbers while the Biden administration waves them through. They’re incentivizing them to come. [More]

It’s almost like “gun safety” is a false front for useful idiots that masks a different motive altogether…

Michigan’s New Gun Laws for 2024 Won’t Stop Violence but Will Infringe on Rights

They’ll be back for more, and more, and more. Because they’ll take what they can get incrementally, but never lose sight of the goal that they want it all. [More]

Who thinks they’ll stop with this?

With Republicans Like These

Rep. John Andrews, R-Paris, said his party’s first priority with regard to firearms would be protecting the state and federal rights of gun owners. But he planned to introduce a bill in the coming session he believed would save lives and protect licensed gun sellers at the same time—through a so-called “yellow alert system.” “If someone does something to trigger a statewide alert, FFLs (Federal Firearms Licenses)—or gun dealers—would get a text and a photo—kind of like an Amber Alert,” Andrews explained. “We would call it a yellow alert system—basically telling them, ‘Do not sell to this person. They are either wanted by the police or are in crisis.'” [More]

Do us a favor and stop “protecting” us.

[Via Jess]

Let’s Hear It for ‘Vigilante Gun Violence’!

Witnesses told police a male suspect robbed the restaurant at gunpoint, firing shots at an employee. Police say the 21-year-old employee returned fire, striking the robber. [More]

For those who say violence is not the answer…

Sometimes it’s the only one.

Especially considering the problem that needs solving.

[Via Sweet Babboo]

Convince Me

Meet Pete Serrano, Washington’s Next Attorney General [Watch]

Really?

Anybody care to tell me what “constitutional, rational firearm regulations that respect the rights of law-abiding citizens while ensuring public safety” means, and how that differs from “gun safety laws are constitutional and not in conflict with Second Amendment rights”?

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights