Tag: “assault weapons”

A Valid Question

Patrol rifle stolen from trooper’s cruiser overnight in Malden, Massachusetts State Police say [More]

Why is it when in the hands of the “Only Ones,” DSM propagandists acting as state enforcer cheerleaders rather than government watchdogs call them “patrol rifles, but when owned by citizens, as is their right recognized by the Second Amendment, they disparage them as “assault rifles,” and “weapons of war suitable only for killing as many people as quickly as possible”?

[Via Steve T]

A Silver Lining

Unreleased transcripts from Uvalde show police waited to breach the classroom because the killer had a combat rifle that could penetrate their armor. They we too scared. We are a nation that allows anyone to buy a rifle that can massacre children while keeping the police at bay. [More]

What this guy said:

[Via WiscoDave]

The Finest Judges Money Can Buy

Yesterday we explored how Gov. Pritzker of Illinois played fast and loose with campaign finance rules to stack the state Supreme Court he is appealing his “assault weapon” ban legal setback to.

Mom-at-Arms has updated its report to prove a conflict of interest and to cite U.S. Supreme Court precedent:

Bishop On Air says “recuse.” (14:56)

None Dare Call It Treason

Biden Regime Confirms Commitment To “Legally-Binding” Agreement Which Will Surrender U.S. Pandemic Authority To Chinese-Backed World Health Organization “For Generations To Come” [More]

He also says he’s going to ban semiautos.

As noted before, per the Constitution, the Senate needs to approve treaties.

[Via Michael G]

Biased Ruling Supporting Semiauto Ban Enabled by Sham Confirmations

Who but someone willfully deluding herself, a liar, or both, would deliberately ignore that the militia is comprised of citizens “capable of acting in concert for the common defense [and] bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time”? Its function was — and still is — to field citizen soldiers. And these citizens bore arms that were suitable for that purpose, “ordinary military equipment” intended to be taken into “common defense” battles. The militia did not assemble on the green bearing torches and pitchforks. They came with the intent to match and best a professional military threat. [More]

And worst of all, this robed … thing … was confirmed by a Republican majority Senate.

One Bite at a Time

Why one popular gun control measure wasn’t part of Colorado Democrats’ reform package [More]

That’s OK– by swindling the public into viewing tyrannical infringements as “reforms,” it’s just a matter of time before the prohibitionists use the incremental position they’ll gain as the launching point for their next incursion.

[Via cydl]

Forced to Cover Old Ground

The Second Amendment Foundation and its partners in the case of Miller v. Bonta, challenging California’s ban on so-called “assault weapons,” have filed a responding brief in the case, countering defense arguments and strategies already rejected by federal courts and the U.S. Supreme Court. [More]

California knows that, of course. Anything to impede.