The Illinois Supreme Court ruled Thursday that people may obtain records about their own Firearm Owners Identification cards, but they may not use the state’s Freedom of Information Act to do so. [More]
[Via Jess]
Category: citizen disarmament
How the Hell, Indeed
How the hell can people keep voting these anti-gun pieces of shite into office? [More]
In California…? I’ve been explaining how for years.
Why not ask the perpetually soliciting gun groups to explain why they have not?
Without Further Comment
Once the comment period has ended, the ATF will consider the public comments before deciding whether to adopt the rule, modify it, or drop it. [More]
Y’know, I was nodding along with you right until this last line. Does anyone seriously believe the decision wasn’t made before the required rule was posted for comment?
The only reason I submitted one was to show my solidarity with those making their refusal to bow down a matter of record. That’s why I urge you to come and stand with us, regardless of the coordinated Astroturf campaign.
I just wish I could believe the poor showing from “our side” is because most consider it a useless effort and believe Bruen will save us, instead of what “experience hath shown” to generally be the case.
[Via Dan Gifford]
Ball’s in Their Court
US Supreme Court justice Amy Coney Barrett just ordered the defendants in National Association for Gun Rights v. Naperville to explain why the court should not enjoin Illinois’s “assault weapon” ban law. [Watch]
And again with the Barden/Sandy Hook ad intro…
[Via Jess]
Still Giving Pause
“This action has raised concern about a possible extralegal attempt by the Biden Administration to harm the domestic firearms manufacturing industry in pursuit of an anti-firearm agenda by starving it of access to international markets for at least 90 days, perhaps indefinitely,” Chairman Comer wrote. [More]
I posted the October 30 Reeves and Dola alert on my WarOnGuns Placeholder blog.
Gaslighting for Headlines
Sens. Angus King (I-Maine) and Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) introduced a bill Thursday to regulate firearms by outlawing weapons with a magazine capacity over 10 rounds, among other measures aimed at increasing gun control. The Gas-Operated Semi-Automatic Firearms Exclusion Act (GOSAFE) comes a month after a gunman killed 18 people in a mass shooting in Lewiston, Maine, not far from where King lives. [More]
F*** these Democrat traitors.
It’s not going anywhere.
And if it did, who worth a damn would comply?
[Via Jess]
The Ostalgie Factor
When the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act was signed into law, it was a time of hope for common sense gun control. That time quickly ended. [More]
A time of hope for whom?
Anybody with a brain (and more than a bachelors degree in a major that didn’t require actual knowledge and a career in a privileged collectivist bubble) saw it for the unworkable and treasonous usurpation of undelegated power that it was.
But I’m sure anyone closed-enough to get their “news” from MSNBC is wailing over paradise lost…
[Via Dan Gifford]
Life in the Matriarchy
Gretchen Whitmer to Michigan men: Don’t annoy your ex or enter her empty ice shanty without her permission or the cops will take all your guns [More]
Bluenosed Temperance battle-axes never went away, they just repurposed.
[Via bondmen]
Making the Grade
Brought to You By…
I’m trying to figure out if it’s my cookies and browser history causing this or the subject matter of the videos I’m trying to access, but more and more every time I try to watch a gun influencer on YouTube, Mark Barden’s showing up first. Is this happening to any of you?
As with Manuel Oliver, as sympathetic as we may feel, his “solution” is antithetical to freedom and unacceptable, and his loss does not give him a claim against our rights.
Starting off the video with these ads undermines the presenter’s work, especially with people who may not be informed and may be otherwise receptive. So I have some questions, because I don’t know how YouTube ad policies work.
Is it intentional placement? Does the client request it? Does the YouTube account where the ad is being placed have any say? If so, do they allow it because monetization is monetization? If not, could they reject it?
Conversely, would a “gun rights” group be able to have their ads placed at the start of gungrab group videos? Has anbody ever seen that happen?
And is this a directed policy by Google/YouTube to deliberately muddle messages they want to suppress, and inject their own?
[Video link submitted via Jess]
Enduring the Interminable
While we are gratified and encouraged by the recent victory in Harney County, it’s important to note that legal efforts to protect the most fundamental rights of gun owners are a long way from over. [More]
Unless the tunnel being dug is redirected, I’m not sure seeing light at the end of it would be a good thing.
Attack of the Gunquacks
Gun violence as a public health crisis explored by U.S. Senate Democrats [More]
Well, we know the areas to quarantine…
That’s why we need to have antibodies for pathogens in the system.
Instead, we have leeches.
[Via Jess]
Popping Cherries
Gun crime expert blasts red state ‘cherry-picking’ by Yale professor in Senate hearing: ‘Political bias’ – Democrats have long claimed red states are more dangerous than blue states [More]
Take the wormy ones out and the rest of the bowl looks pretty good.
Appeals Court Rules California Can Continue Doxing Gun Owners to Agenda ‘Researchers’
That “misuse” can be deliberate by activists gone wild or due to lax/incompetent security protocols. And it’s not like sensitive and supposedly secure government systems at the highest levels can’t be breached and hacked by anyone, from cyber criminals to foreign enemies. It’s not like names, addresses, and lists don’t have real-world street value, and it would be just like the prohibitionists to have their efforts actually increase violence and its incentives. [More]
Why do you need privacy if you’re not doing anything wrong?
Common Denominators
A Pyrrhic Victory
He added that the county law “as intended by the County, effectively bans the concealed carry of a firearm in Montgomery County outside of one’s home or business, effectively nullifying a state granted right to those who have applied for and received a concealed carry permit by the Maryland State Police.” [More]
Take the win, but if you accept that premise you’ve already surrendered.
[Via JG]
Not Your Father’s Democrats
And Furthermore…
Judicial System Reeks with Democrat Political Bias Against Guns and More
They’re not only conflicted but hiding it. You don’t get more in-your-face corrupt than that. But don’t look for the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board to care. [More]
What good is having your day in court when the judge is in bed with the offending politicians?
The Medicine We’ve Been Taking Doesn’t Taste Very Good, Does It?
A wave of open Jew-hatred by medical professionals, medical schools, and professional associations in the wake of the Hamas slaughter suggests that a field entrusted with healing is becoming a licensed purveyor of hatred [More]
Boy, we know what that’s like.
So– when will we see a change in alliances?
[Via Michael G]
