We’re the Only Ones Hoplophobic Enough

Milwaukee police said they were so afraid of their department-issued handguns randomly firing, they wouldn’t bring them home near their family [More]

I’m not a hardware guy– I do rights. I don’t know enough about it to know if this is just a ploy to put on public pressure or if there really is a design/manufacturing flaw. Like I said back when, if the allegations are true, then it’s not protected. Which is as it should be.

Fascists Attack Hero of Justice and Equity

A St. Louis judge sanctioned St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner’s office last week for allegedly withholding evidence in a double-murder case, while allowing the suspect out on bond, amid rising criticism about left-wing prosecutors allowing crime to flourish in major U.S. cities. [More]

And you’ll notice the strategy of those who want things to be this way is to deflect with charges of racism and antisemitism so that people will be afraid to speak the truth.

[Via bondmen]

Machine Gun Charges Against Sheriff Recall Earlier Incidents and ‘Only Ones’ Elitism

But whether the top cops are innocent or guilty of charges is beside the real point gun owners should be concerned with. The militarization of police is what opens the door to exclusivity and enables corruption. And you’d better believe the officials and the deputies/officers they command would arrest any of us if they found us non-compliant with a “gun law.” The “Only Ones” hypocrisy reeks. [More]

Nice work if you can get it. The problem is, without a badge, you can’t, and therein lies the crux of police as “Only Ones.”

At What Price?

It’s all because Judge McCannon rejected the plea deal Price offered Delonzo Logwood, accused of three murders – one during a carjacking/robbery, a murder for hire, and killing a witness set to testify against his step brother. He faces 75 years to life in prison if convicted. Price offered him 15 years on a single voluntary manslaughter charge. [More]

And guess who’s behind her

Or does mentioning that make me antisemitic?

[Via 1Gat]

Cold Turkey for Authority Junkies?

In sum, § 922(d)(3) does not withstand Second Amendment scrutiny for much the same reasons that § 922(g)(3) does not. The law’s broad prohibition on the sale or transfer of firearms to unlawful users of controlled substances burdens the Second Amendment rights of those individuals to nearly the same extent as § 922(g)(3). And, as the Court found when assessing § 922(g)(3), our Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation does not support placing such a burden on the Second Amendment right. [More]

It would be rich if the person who ultimately got this part of the law overturned for good was Hunter Biden.

[Via Jess]

Play Stupid Games Win Stupid Prizes

FAFO. [More]

However, the prosecutor said the shooting was not justified because Colie shot someone who was unarmed inside a mall. The judge denied the bond request and believed Colie was a danger to the public.

And the harasser got within six inches? I may have reacted physically, too, and we know what a well-placed fist can do.

I don’t think it’s out of line to wonder what the prosecutor and judge would have done had this moron’s shooter been an “Only One.”

[Via Steve T]

Oh Boy! Money Money Money!

Families of 2 Richneck students plan lawsuits against Newport News Public Schools [More]

Hey, if these parasites want to claim emotional whiplash to scam for some tax plunder coerced from the productive, what’s this holding out on their names crap?

And hell, if they were traumatized, what about the poor kids subjected to the original Only One?

[Via Mack H]

If You See Something Say Something…?

A first-grade student who allegedly warned Abby Zwerner that his classmate had a gun and planned to shoot her was told by the teacher to “sit down and be quiet,” his attorney says. [More]

And here I was starting to feel sorry for her.

If that bears out, traumatized students and parents dealing with it should sue her.

[Via Mack H]

Half Measures

As other circuits have recognized, there is a rational relationship between prohibiting unlawfully present aliens from possessing firearms and achieving the legitimate goal of public safety. [More]

So illegal aliens are not the “ourselves and our Posterity” nor “the people” the Founders were contemplating in the Second Amendment…

True enough, but the real solution requires expelling them from the Republic. Otherwise, we’re left with another “law” being violated.

[Via Jess]

Lest Ye Be Judged

WE DID IT – thanks to the tireless efforts of Wisconsin Moms Demand Action volunteers and help from supporters like you, Judge Janet Protasiewicz was elected to the Wisconsin Supreme Court! [More]

In other words, it will be impossible for anything Second Amendment-related to get a fair hearing on an appeal.

And if Wisconsin Democrats have their way, it will be illegal aliens hauling gun owners in.

What We’ve Got Here is Failure to Communicate

Zwerner’s lawyers allege that the Jan. 6 shooting was a personal attack that the school board and administrators failed to protect the teacher against the student despite multiple warnings. [More]

I don’t read that as the duty to protect that the “Only Ones” don’t have. I read it as deliberate indifference and negligence for failure to act following numerous credible warnings.

I’m wondering if now might be a good time to reintroduce these:

[Via Mack H]

Qualified Impunity

All to say, the Supreme Court’s original justification for qualified
immunity—that Congress wouldn’t have abrogated common-law
immunities absent explicit language—is faulty because the 1871 Civil Rights Act expressly included such language. Those sixteen lost words, by presumably encompassing state common-law principles, undermine the doctrine’s long professed foundation and underscore that what the 1871 Congress meant for state actors who violate Americans’ federal rights is not immunity, but liability—indeed, liability notwithstanding any state law to the contrary. [More]

So the whole scam is exactly that, and it’s within the power of the Supreme Court to end it…?

[Via Michael G]

New York, New York, It’s a Wonderful Town

A New York City parking garage attendant was hit with an attempted murder charge after confronting an armed thief and wrestling the gun away before opening fire on the suspect. Moussa Diarra, 57, is also charged with assault and criminal possession of a weapon in connection with the incident that occurred at around 5:30 a.m. Saturday morning. [More]

This is what the prohibitionists would have us all reduced to.

With “legally-recognized” criminal possession exceptions, of course.

Funny, how often the racist inequities of that turn up.

UPDATE

DA Alvin Bragg will not prosecute NYC garage worker who shot armed thief [More]

Yeah, now that there are eyes on this and he fears it may affect public sympathies for him in his quest to make a national name for himself in the political persecution of Orange Man.

Why was the poor guy charged in the first damn place?

Unclear on the Concept

No wonder she’s so hot for “red flag laws.”

[Via WiscoDave]

Brace Yourselves

For the reasons discussed, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief or, in the alternative, for postponement of the Final Rule’s effective date (ECF No. 33). [More]

So infringements by swarms of officers are constitutional now…?

Oh, look! He was nominated by the Vote Freedom First President!

[Via Jess]

We’re (Joseph T. Davis) the Only Ones Sealing Enough

A special agent with the U.S. Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) has decided to enter a plea deal in a Cochise County court to resolve an allegation he engaged in nonconsensual sexual contact with a bartender while off-duty at a Bisbee hotel in 2020. But first, Joseph T. Davis wants most of the case documents sealed from the public, purportedly due to potential career and safety issues. [More]

Set loose the Streisand Effect!

[Via WiscoDave]

UPDATE

You complain, we listen. Received via email:

Normal American
You
David:

I was distressed and disturbed to read your post about the ATF agent who wanted his court documents sealed, especially when I read his full name in the body of your post.

This is inappropriate. The correct approach is to put his full name in the headline of the post, which carries with it more SEO weight.

I hope you fix this unfortunate oversight.

NA

Verified by MonsterInsights