Giffords Endorsee Throws ‘Gun Owners for Safety’ Under Bus

It’s fair to point out that this is yet another piece of evidence that the Giffords gun grab group is exploiting sport shooters with false promises if it does not condemn Escobar’s betrayal of one of their core strategies – appealing to foolish “Fudds” who think if they have theirs it’s safe to throw other gun owners under the bus. [More]

What kind of moronic Fudd believes these rights swindlers are interested in anything but using him?

On a Bender

“We can put a man on the moon … but we can’t have the technology to keep killing machines out of schools,” Bender said. “Or out of uncertified hands,” Cameron added matter-of-factly. [More]

After checking out her Facebook page, it’s more than obvious why the “real reporter” chose hers to be the viewpoint promoted.

[Via JG]

Ushering in a New and Golden Age

St. Louis aldermen are set to introduce more gun control bills at their meeting Friday. The bills would create the offenses of “unlawful possession of firearms” and “unlawful transfer of weapons.” [More]

In other words, federal and state laws that are already being broken now?

Think how much safer the city will finally be after they adjourn!

It’s like they go out of their way to elect grifting morons there.

[Via bondmen]

At Least He Doesn’t Hit Like a Girl

The brutal beatdown captured on video shows the trans-identified student, a biological male, throwing multiple blows to the female student’s head after he violently grabbed her hair, yanked her back and forth, then knocked her down flat in the school hallway. [More]

Yet if a boy called this sadistic thug out and put him in his place he’d be charged with a hate crime.

[Via Michael G]

Judicial Skulduggery

So the Ninth Circuit has immediately declared they’re going to handle this case en banc without allowing a three judge panel to hear it first… [Watch]

The only real question: Will the Supreme Court let 9th Circuit Democrat apparatchiks get away with how they’ve signaled they intend to rule?

[Via Jess]

Tales of Wells Fargo

Gun Manufacturer Ruger Alleges Discrimination from Wells Fargo in Letter to Texas Lawmakers – The gun company is asking state lawmakers to investigate why the Texas Attorney General’s Office concluded the banking giant didn’t discriminate against them. [More]

Why didn’t Tucker ask Ken Paxton about that?

It’s not the first time I’ve scratched my head.

Ol’ Wells Fargo sure has changed…

And Ruger knows a thing or two about discriminating.

[Via Jess]

Not to Put Too Fine a Point on Things, But…

“We already know the President took bribes from Burisma. I also want to add, betraying your country is treason.” [More]

They’re going after Trump with scorched earth lawfare backed by the might of states in collusion with the feds.

You can’t counter that with committee meetings the DSM either ignores and/or misrepresents/condemns.

[Via Jess]

Nobody Knows the Trouble She’s Seen?

“I can’t believe this I’m traumatized the way they treated me in the jails wow this what these people do to us black people 60!” [More]

What, they treated you like someone who can’t make her own decisions? Give one specific example of you being singled out for special discriminatory treatment by racists.

What should happen to people who steal from others and destroy their property? What should happen to people who steal from you and destroy yours?

Who will influence the influencers?

And what’s their game?

Tangentially-Related UPDATE

Man arrested during looting was out on bail in connection with deadly assault outside bar [More]

Man, there sure are a lot of victims of racism in a city ruled by Democrats…

[Via Steve T]

Police Shooting Victim Disputes County Attorney’s Attempt to Have Complaint Dismissed

Kloepfer’s assertions against the County Attorney’s Motion to dismiss reject his claims, citing precedents, arguing qualified immunity does not apply because “Defendant Brown published a press release he knew or should have known to be false to ‘control the narrative’ about misconduct in a malicious and corrupt manner that constituted conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice”… [More]

The defense of the indefensible continues.

An Unlawful Law and a Criminal Criminal Statute

The lawyers for Zaki Rahimi have filed a powerful compelling argument against the criminal statute 18 USC 922 G8 which is the question presented whether or not that is constitutional under the Second Amendment and Rahimi’s attorneys have 0:19 actually made some additional creative arguments that we’re going to talk about… [Watch]

Mark W. Smith breaks it down for us.

[Via Jess]

Verified by MonsterInsights