The Same Except They’re Different

The argument that commercially available, AR-type firearms are somehow less dangerous or lethal simply because they fire only in semi-automatic mode is misleading. They retain the identical performance capabilities and characteristics (save full-automatic capability) as initially intended for use in combat. [More]

Oh, is that all? Spread that lie under oath!

Also from the linked Exhibit:

As mentioned previously in this report, many of the firearms prohibited by the Ordinances directly trace their origins to those developed for use in combat. As such, these firearms were never initially intended for general distribution or sale to the public.

Except if we’re talking ARs, and of course he is, guess which one came first:

“Colt sent a pilot model rifle (serial no. GX4968) to the BATF for civilian sale approval on Oct. 23, 1963. It was approved on Dec. 10, 1963, and sales of the ‘Model R6000 Colt AR-15 SP1 Sporter Rifle’ began on Jan 2, 1964,” one critic of the article contended. “The M16 wasn’t issued to infantry units until 1965 (as the XM16E1), wasn’t standardized as the M16A1 until 1967, and didn’t officially replace the M14 until 1969.”

Tell me this Yurgealitis trough feeder isn’t cognizant of Founding intent and is incentivized by those who fear that and obscure it through gaslighting.

And tangentially related:

As predicted, they’re taking full advantage of Scalia’s critical error.

In re later “Bowie knives” edicts and the like, does anyone have a record of such laws ever being challenged on Second Amendment grounds and such bans being upheld and/or appealed to a higher court?

We Don’t Need No Education

Oregon again says students don’t need to prove mastery of reading, writing or math to graduate, citing harm to students of color [More]

That’s one way to make excuses for the subversive scam of teachers’ unions, where incompetence is a feature, not a bug. Create chaos and dependency through indoctrination and ignorance, and add in importing pathway-to-citizenship foreign nationals whose countries can somehow churn out employees with superior technical abilities on a pittance of what we spend per capita on students, and you have all the ingredients for control — of all kinds.

Not that our “single-issue gun rights leaders” dare notice…

[Via WiscoDave]

We’re the Only Ones Fishing Enough

Like geofence warrants, keyword warrants cast a dragnet that require a provider to search its entire reserve of user data—in this case, queries by one billion Google users. Police generally have no identified suspects; instead, the sole basis for the warrant is the officer’s hunch that the suspect might have searched for something in some way related to the crime. [More]

Ah, the old Inspector Clouseau theory of policing

So what happens if you use Duck Duck Go?

[Via Michael G]

Adding Fuel to the Fire

New York AG Tells Platforms to Disclose What They Are Doing About “Calls for Violence and Other Materials That May Incite Violence” [More]

That seems like an excellent way to encourage responses to state actors initiating violence.

Can you imagine Letitia James with unchecked power?

[Via Michael G]

In Time of Need…

FEDERAL GUN CONFISCATION: Can President Biden Declare a WAR or EMERGENCY and TAKE YOUR GUNS? [Watch]

Precedent says “no,” but he could try…

How many he could get, whether they’d be dumb enough to attempt it, and what they’d do if met with defiance is another story.

That’s an interesting point about the gun exemption to Roosevelt’s requisitioning mandate based on 2A being an individual right. That’s something to throw back in the faces of antis claiming that recognition is a recent “gun lobby” fraud.

[Via Jess]

‘Scheme’ is Right

The Western Australian government is set to introduce new gun laws, which could be the first of their kind in Australia. A limit for how many guns a licensee can own will be proposed, seeing the number of firearms capped at ten for competitive club shooters. Individual recreational gun users will only be allowed to own five. A voluntary buyback scheme is in the works for those impacted by the proposed changes. The proposed new laws will make Western Australia the first state in the country to impose a firearm cap. [Watch]

Leave it to “real reporters” to call mandates “voluntary” with a straight face.

Hey, are we actually obligated to defend this drunken suicide cult?

[Via Jess]

Flight of the Nazgûl 

Ninth Circuit issues partial stay in California large-capacity gun magazine case – The four dissenting judges railed against the majority decision, calling the Ninth Circuit’s attitude about the Second Amendment “laughably absurd.” [More]

Except this is no laughing matter.

The Ninth Circuit wrote the book on Second Amendment absurdity going back to their “no individual right” days when the late, dunderheaded Cynthia Holcomb Hall wrote:

Moreover, even if we determined that Hickman had standing to sue for violation of the Second Amendment, his suit would nevertheless fail because the Second Amendment is not incorporated into the Bill of Rights.

[Via Jess]

Bris and Tell

Hackers Access, Leak and Sell 23andMe User Data Targeting Ashkenazi Jews [More]

So how many vote Democrat and demand “universal background checks” along with licensing and registration…?

Sorry, I don’t trust any of the companies.

Even what they don’t share or sell can be subpoenaed. My guess is a prominent required Miranda-style “anything you submit” warning before signing up could put a damper on their businesses. I also wonder if a close relative DNA testing might be used in LEO fishing expeditions…

[Via Michael G]

Achtung, Mitglieder der Hausbesitzervereinigung

Our homeowners’ association is considering banning guns everywhere in the community, including in the residents’ homes. Many of the residents are upset about this, while others are in favor of it. Is the association even able to enact this rule? [More]

Tyranny starts small, and always offers “justification.”

I always wondered what ever happened to Witless and Titless.

[Via Jess]

Highway Robbery

Thousands of drivers receiving speed camera tickets in small Summit County village… He said he is considering challenging the ticket, but the Stow Municipal Court requires that drivers who want to appeal the ticket pay $100. [More]

These $$holes are right next door to Hudson. You have to drive through there to get to most of my favorite walking trails.

If you took a look at the “solution” vs. the scope of the problem, it would be apparent this is all about revenue generation, and anyone who blurts out “public safety” is just mealy-mouthing an excuse to cover for this being a direct violation of the whole intent of Constitutional government to “secure the Blessings of Liberty.”

They also gouge you on parking. And requiring you to pay by phone seems discriminatory against technologically impaired older people who may struggle with Jitterbugs, acknowledged to be “designed to help older adults stay in touch with their loved ones” and that they only use for phone calls.

The other thing this is is an unconstitutional prior restraint on the First Amendment proscription to “make no law … prohibiting … the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

It’s analogous to a poll tax. Or a gun permit fee.

And every bit as discriminatory.

That seems like a good opportunity for a class action lawsuit.

And if I were a “real reporter,” with the resources of a news organization behind me, I’d be going through city records to find out who got the traffic cam contract, and also doing a public records request for all communications, correspondence, phone records, work papers, calibration records, and all relevant documentation showing city official interactions with them.

Says the Would-Be Tyrant Who Wants Our Guns

Hillary Clinton: “There Needs To Be A Formal Deprogramming” Of The Trump Cult Members [More]

Assuming the struggle sessions don’t work, that’s a lot of people to Arkancide…

I see foreign national (British/Iranian) Christiane Amanpour continues nailing the subversive role that pleases her masters so well.

What have I been saying all along about Trump being an avatar for the citizens who believe in the agenda he campaigned on?

Thing is, Hillary knows this will enrage millions. She’s hoping some low-hanging fruit goes off the deep end and does something horrific, knowing full well most “conservatives” who end up smeared by conflation will continue to behave peaceably. If Trump said this about Democrats they’d throw him in the hole.

This is dangerous and the lowest form of politics. And it’s part of a DOJ/media-coordinated narrative plan leading for the elections and beyond, that is, it’s that seditious conspiracy they project onto their opponents.

Thank God the Founders, in their prescient wisdom, ensured the Second Amendment would be there for Posterity to call upon when any form of government bec[ame] destructive to [Liberty’s] ends…

Police State

If I were going to be paranoid I’d say this is a great way for the regime to identify its hardcore informed political opposition via online credit transactions, plus, where it’s playing in my area, gather them in gun-free zones that don’t allow facial recognition concealment

So yeah, I’ll probably go. It’s not like I’ll be a surprise.

I wonder if Antifa protestors will show up…

Verified by MonsterInsights