An addendum to my Democrat judicial bias piece sent by X messaging:

[Via President Non_Fudd]
Notes from the Resistance

They’re not only conflicted but hiding it. You don’t get more in-your-face corrupt than that. But don’t look for the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board to care. [More]
What good is having your day in court when the judge is in bed with the offending politicians?
Christie says Trump’s ‘intolerant language and conduct’ contribute to rise in antisemitism [More]
That sounds like something “a closet antisemite” would say…
It’s not Trump agenda supporters out to make them — and everyone else — more vulnerable. And he doesn’t think “dangerous… crazy [and] radical” sounds intolerant?
Boy, the DSM sure is playing it up with everything they’ve got, though…
[Via Steve T]
Virginia Dems Seek Ban on Assault Weapons After Election Wins [More]
With plenty of tax plunder to use against challenges.
Somebody want to tell race hustler Don Scott what “Jim Crow” really stood for when it came to guns?
And Jorge helped.
[Via Jess]
So say 3,400 obedient Illinoisans. [More]

Judge Robert Raschio in Harney County has declared Measure 114 to be “facially unconstitutional by a finding of clear and convincing evidence…” [More]
I’m a proud card-carrying member of the NRA… [More]
He then proceeds to endorse the evisceration of the Second Amendment.
Association Bylaws, Article III, Sec. 11, “Involuntary Termination of Membership and Disciplinary Proceedings” states in part:
“Any individual or organization member may be suspended or expelled for good cause, including, but not limited to, any conduct which is contrary to, or in violation of the Bylaws of the Association.”
This public anti-gun advocacy is in direct conflict with Article II, Purposes and Objectives, section 1:
“To protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, especially with reference to the inalienable right of the individual American citizen guaranteed by such Constitution to acquire, possess, collect, exhibit, transport, carry, transfer ownership of, and enjoy the right to use arms, in order that the people may always be in a position to exercise their legitimate individual rights of self-preservation and defense of family, person, and property, as well as to serve effectively in the appropriate militia for the common defense of the Republic and the individual liberty of its citizens;”
Additionally, Article III, “Membership,” section 1., “Eligibility,” requires that the member “subscribes to the objectives and purposes of the Association.”
I say expel the subverting old Fudd.
More to the point, what is the mental state of some ignorant Marxist hoplophobe who doesn’t understand the Second Amendment and thinks Americans who do will allow themselves to be disarmed?
Army Ammunition Plant Is Tied to Mass Shootings Across the U.S. [More]
Tied by whom, Ben Dooley of The New York Times, the “D” part of the DSM? What was the purpose of writing this article?
I wonder if you compared all ammo sold by Lake City to the civilian market to the number of those rounds used in acts of violence what the abuse rate would be, and how many “0s” would follow the “.” to come up with a percentage…
[Via Dan Gifford]

NYC Mayor Eric Adams leads call for Speaker Mike Johnson to pass assault weapons ban [More]
Anything to add, Tucker…?
UPDATE
Suddenly the need for alternative headlines becomes clear:
Eric Adams had cellphones, iPad seized by FBI as part of corruption investigation
As predicted by the Four Boxes Diner, in a 2-1 decision the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit— via a opinion by judges Wood and Easterbrook— have upheld Illinois’s “assault weapon” ban. However there is a strong dissent here. This decision is no shock to Four Boxes Diner viewers because as I explained before, in my view, Judge Wood and Judge Easterbrook are unserious jurists on 2A issues and this was a given outcome (unfortunate and frustrating, yes, but entirely predictable). [More]
Meanwhile, over in Fantasy Land…
Right, she just wants to protect us. [More]
Because we’re not very bright.
“Blue Virginia,” eh…?
[Via Michael G]
ATF Director Calls for Universal Background Checks, Assault Weapons Ban at Harvard IOP Forum [More]
Then there’s this:
And then we scan them, right? But as far as I know, we are the only customer of Adobe Acrobat that actually pays extra money to have search capability taken out of that software.
I see some influencers treating this like a newly admitted database violation “Gotcha.” I must not be grokking something because this has been out there for years:
How can a database be “non-searchable”? Trick question: The system can’t really be considered a database. (There is a reason the ATF uses the phrase “data systems” instead). There is no ability to search the text of a file, and no effort is made to tag files with identifiers that could later be used to sort and search. “We compare it to an electronic card catalog system, where records are digitally imaged, but not optimized for character recognition,” ATF spokesman Corey Ray says.
Am I completely missing a point?
[Via William T]
King said his bill will address the specific technologies that make such weapons especially deadly… [More]
Let’s hope someone finally does something about that shoulder thing that goes up— you know, for the children.
[Via Jess]

A 23-year-old Beach Park felon was arrested over the weekend for bringing an AR-15 loaded with “penetrator rounds” to a Halloween party in Antioch, Illinois. We need a federal assault weapons ban now! [More]
Drifting in and out again, I see…
“Penetrator rounds”…
Golden: I have opposed efforts to ban deadly weapons of war like the assault rifle he used to carry out this crime. The time has now come for me to take responsibility for this failure. Which is why I now call on the United States congress to ban assault rifles [Watch]
I wonder who he b**w over at NSSF:

[Via Jess]
California’s assault weapons ban will remain in effect while a court considers whether the 30-year-old law is unconstitutional. [More]
That a court thinks there’s anything to consider is our first clue that the game is rigged.
I think we all know that the Ninth Circuit is going to side with citizen disarmament and it’ll take SCOTUS strapping ’em on to get a proper ruling–provided the Republicans don’t blow ’24 and the composition of the High Court changes while the clock is running.
Not that that would settle it…
[Via Jess]